Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

CyberTerrorism - Reality or FUD? 358

Random Utinni writes "The director of the U.S. Cyber Consequences Unit (part of Homeland Security) claims that terrorist hackers are poised to create total chaos. He predicts all sorts of scenarios, from changing the formulae for medications to causing cars to explode after a few weeks of driving. Is this guy fearmongering for an increased budget, or is he on to something here?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

CyberTerrorism - Reality or FUD?

Comments Filter:
  • Chicken Littles? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by informatico ( 978356 ) on Thursday June 01, 2006 @08:42PM (#15450120) Homepage Journal
    Reminds me of the up coming horrors of Y2K that amounted to a few slot machines not working after midnight.

    Although chicken littles can be right once in a while given the sheer number of warnings tossed about, and then no one listens to them when they should have ;).
  • by trolleymusic ( 938183 ) on Thursday June 01, 2006 @08:48PM (#15450177) Homepage
    As a former public servant, I can tell you that fear-mongering and blowing things out of proportion is an important way that a department justifies the resources they are using.
  • by geekoid ( 135745 ) <dadinportland&yahoo,com> on Thursday June 01, 2006 @08:48PM (#15450180) Homepage Journal
    then tylenol scare?

    Yeah, if people started dying because medical drug formulas were screwed up, it would cause terror, and for a longer time then a bomb could.
  • by GeneralEmergency ( 240687 ) on Thursday June 01, 2006 @08:55PM (#15450217) Journal


    Many years ago, I worked for a small company that had a contract to service the massive dot matrix signs that are spaced every few miles along the Southern California freeway network.

    As part of the job, we were given a portable ascii terminal to enter test pattern data directly into the sign controller. Just for fun, we held an internal contest to think up 'What was the worst possible thing that we could type into the portable terminal for posting over the freeway at rush hour'.

    The winner?

    "INCOMING NUKE ATTACK - EST 15 MIN"

    Just imagine the bedlam .
  • Confusing (Score:3, Interesting)

    by illuminatedwax ( 537131 ) <stdrange@nOsPAm.alumni.uchicago.edu> on Thursday June 01, 2006 @08:57PM (#15450225) Journal
    This doesn't seem like strictly "cyber" terror. My guess is that things like power plants valves and switches, prescription formulas, and car design specifications are NOT ON THE INTERNET. This is industrial sabotage, which requires physical access to the resources. The "cyber" part just means that computers are somehow involved. So what we have here is just a new way terrorists can fuck with us that we need to pay attention too.

    Certainly people running power plants or pharmaceuticals need to secure their own internal computer network to keep some guy from reaching over a secretary's desk and altering the recipe for Prozac. But calling it "cyber" terrorism is just going to scare people into allowing the government to monitor their Internet traffic. After all, you wouldn't want a terrorist breaking into a nuclear powerplant over the Internet would you?! It's just another power grab instead of sanely alerting the respective authorities.
  • by SmallFurryCreature ( 593017 ) on Thursday June 01, 2006 @09:32PM (#15450434) Journal
    This guy has a job to do and that is to come up with worste case scenarios and then try to figure out how to stop them from happening.

    In a way that smoke detector the fire department tells you to install is no different. How many houses burn down? Not that many actually, the chances of you ever needing the smoke detector are remote. In fact it will most likely go off on a false alarm.

    Yet few would argue with the need for smoke detectors in the kitchen. But how about your bedroom? How many electronic gizmo's are near you bed with hot power adapters?

    So I don't think this guy is fearmongering. He is doing his job just as a firemen who tells you your house is going to burn down.

    As human beings we got to weigh the dangers vs the benefits. Some american idiots live in hurricane zones and earthquake areas, said this dutchie living in an area that is two meters below sea level with only a natural dune protecing him (Amsterdam, Holland).

    We need people to come up with the most terrible storms that can happen and then calculate what will happen to the dykes and dunes if those storm happen to coincide with a tide in a period of heavy rain.

    Then we can say if we are willing to take the risk OR invest in a better defences.

    This guy has the same job. Are any of the attacks possible? Well considering that a lot of people believe the recent american power failure was due to a windows security hole I think there is a possibilty. Are we willing to accept this risk or do accept it as the price of living in this world, as I accept the risk of drowning and LA's people accept the risk of being the meat in a bridge sandwiche?

    But calling fearmongering is just stupid. Accepting the risks is one thing. Denial is another.

  • by layer3switch ( 783864 ) on Thursday June 01, 2006 @09:45PM (#15450496)
    Such as MySpace, Rotten, RealUltimatePower, Scientology, etc.

    Jokes aside, good read on CyberTerrorism before 911. Evidently CyberTerrorism isn't post 911 antics. It's been around for years now.
    http://www.cnn.com/TECH/specials/hackers/cyberterr or/ [cnn.com]
  • by billstewart ( 78916 ) on Thursday June 01, 2006 @09:49PM (#15450519) Journal
    He's definitely fearmongering for more budget - but it's a lot more than that, because all of these things reinforce each other. When the public is afraid and angry because the government got caught with a policy of widespread unwarranted wiretapping, fearmongering helps divert the anger, and Angermongering (against child pornographers and other scum) helps get them more budget as well. More budget for "anti-cyberterrorism" really means more budget for tools and regulations that let them eavesdrop on more of the Internet and Telephone Networks, which can be used to stalk more of the Administration's political enemies (including real criminals and real terrorists as well as leakers, liberals, Quakers and journalists), and catching more enemies gives them more political things to brag about, whether it's really child pornographers or just skr1p7 k1dd13z, and it helps divert the public's attention and anger from the spying they're doing on citizens. And it gets them more budget, so more tools, so more successes, so more positive PR, rinse&repeat.

    And it doesn't matter if they don't succeed as long as they brag a lot, because the public _knows_ there are more real scum out there than they can catch. And a scumbag who escapes or a cyberterrorist who hasn't done enough to get caught at it yet are both fine publicity (as long as they don't look like bleeding incompetents in the process) - it means they obviously need _more_ powers so they can catch the next one.

  • by Slur ( 61510 ) on Thursday June 01, 2006 @11:28PM (#15451008) Homepage Journal
    If only this kind of fear-mongering worked for things that matter on a broader, deeper scale...

    I'm thinking particularly of the incessant decay of the US quality of life due to the usurpation of our systems of agriculture, education, health, and welfare by private interests. The failure to properly develop these systems is leading inexorably to the collapse of the USA. No one is afraid because the frog in the slow boiling pot never knows its predicament till it's too late.

    People should also be trembling at the insane schemes being used to divert of the people's wealth through the "war-funnel" directly into the pockets of a few industrialists, primarily to fund the further usurpation of the people's government by corporatists.

    For some reason, even after the horrors of Nazism, our current brand of Fascism doesn't seem to scare people, even as it undermines and threatens our lives in a thousand subtle ways. The air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat, and the society we live in are becoming increasingly dangerous to our own health. Yet no one stirs as their neighbors are snatched up from empty factory floors and sent to foreign lands to be maimed and killed to enrich Halliburton. No one even blinks as petroleum and agriculture collude to foster diseases that keep the pharmaceutical stocks ballooning.

    east timor, petroleum, nafta, fertilizers, pharmaceuticals, 9-11, coyness, illegal surveillance, gmo seeds, data mining, mad cow disease, mandatory testing, guantanamo bay, rampant privatization, obtuseness, selling off the commons, executive war crimes, strip mining, the war on terra, faux news, cafta, kissinger, allende, iraq, bunker busters, missing billions, media culpa, torture, abu ghraib, reality television....

    The connections are clear and simple. The machine now bleeds the people, everywhere, without conscience.

    Be afraid, be very afraid.
  • by castoridae ( 453809 ) on Thursday June 01, 2006 @11:53PM (#15451181)
    One could argue that deaths due to terrorism are low precisely because we've spent a lot on fighting it.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 02, 2006 @12:02AM (#15451220)

    If it were just FUD, no one would have died.

    Do you think no one ever dies of FUD?

    What's the body count of US soldiers in Iraq? Add in the body count of Iraqis, too. And all them dead bodies were caused by FUD, weren't they? No WMD, no alliance of Iraq and Al Qaida. A war over absolutely nothing of substance. Nada. Only FUD.

    And one of the shames of it is that it demonstrates that the society of the USA cannot learn from its history. Go look up this phrase: "Remember the Maine"

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 02, 2006 @12:59PM (#15455323)
    It's all FUD eh?

    What about what just happened with Blue Frog. Someone finally finds a way to fight back against those who waste our time and annoy us to death with their spam, but the spammer's send out death threats and shutdown the system with DDos attacks. No, your right, it is just FUD.
  • by Artifex33 ( 932236 ) on Friday June 02, 2006 @04:32PM (#15457595)
    So, we should wait until the chances of dying from a terror attack are what, 30000:1? 10000:1? At what point do the deaths make you willing to part with a few of your tax dollars which would have otherwise been spent on supporting politicians' vote-buying social programs and bridges-to-nowhere?

    This comment thread is rife with those who it is very clear have never been in a position, nor have had someone dear to them be in a position where a sociopath wants to kill them because they believe differently than the sociopath does.

    What were YOU thinking as the World Trade Centers fell? Were you complaining that a small portion of your tax dollars were going to be redirected, or were you pontificating for peace at any cost? Surrender? Complaining that your phone records were being stored by the NSA (like they have been since Carter's day)? Most of the comments in this thread referring to the war would have been flamed mercilessly in the days following that attack, but now, most of you seemed to have forgotten what it felt like to witness the attack of a foreign power (many states openly sponsor terrorism--Iraq (Saddam paid bounties to the families of suicide bombers), Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc.) on your own soil.

    How much will it take for people like the author of the previous post to stop complaining and instead take notice? Dirty bomb? Nuclear attack? Virus attack? All of these have been espoused widely and publicly by Islamofascist dogma in all the countries I've already mentioned.

    So wrap the comfort of a malcontent-friendly forum around you, bitch and moan some more, and hope those you're trashing are doing their jobs, and the deaths that finally galvanize the ostrich-like trolls of this forum don't include your own.

"The one charm of marriage is that it makes a life of deception a neccessity." - Oscar Wilde

Working...