Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Advances in Bio-weaponry 279

kjh1 writes "Technology Review is running an eye-opening article on how biotechnology has advanced to the point where producing bio-weapons that were once only possible with the backing of governments with enormous resources is now possible with equipment purchased off eBay. You can now purchase a mini-lab of equipment for less than $10,000. The writer also interviewed a former Soviet bioweaponeer, Serguei Popov, who worked at the Biopreparat, the Soviet agency that secretly developed biological weapons. Popov has since moved to the US and provided a great deal of information on the types of weapons the Soviets were developing."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Advances in Bio-weaponry

Comments Filter:
  • by Entropy ( 6967 ) on Sunday April 09, 2006 @06:36PM (#15096464)
    He was deputy chief of science opperations at one of the USSR's main bioweapons facilities, and has detailed much of this experience in "Biohazard".

    Frankly, this is the stuff of horror stories.
  • Re:worried? (Score:4, Informative)

    by joe 155 ( 937621 ) on Sunday April 09, 2006 @06:48PM (#15096515) Journal
    I think sarin is a chemical weapons as opposed to a biological one
  • Relevant Literature (Score:2, Informative)

    by coyotecult ( 647958 ) on Sunday April 09, 2006 @06:52PM (#15096532) Homepage
    Does anyone remember Frank Herbert's book "The White Plague"?
  • Re:at last (Score:2, Informative)

    by Davey McDave ( 926282 ) <psychodave@gmailFREEBSD.com minus bsd> on Sunday April 09, 2006 @06:52PM (#15096535) Homepage
    Ha, only on slashdot could that get moderated informative.
  • by Cyno01 ( 573917 ) <Cyno01@hotmail.com> on Sunday April 09, 2006 @07:04PM (#15096584) Homepage
    Yes, sarin is a nerve gas. And think about it, they pumped a bunch of poisin gas into a confined space with thousands of people, and managed to kill a total of 12. And this is the largest scale terrorist chemical attack ever!

    From wikipedia:
    The first successful use of chemical agents by terrorists against a general civilian population was on March 20, 1995. Aum Shinrikyo, an apocalyptic group based in Japan that believed it necessary to destroy the planet, released sarin into the Tokyo subway system killing 12 and injuring over 5,000. The group had attempted biological and chemical attacks on at least 10 prior occasions, but managed to affect only cult members. The group did manage to successfully release sarin outside an apartment building in Matsumoto in June 1994; this use was directed at a few specific individuals living in the building and was not an attack on the general population.


    Sucessful dispersal of chemical and biological agents is tough. Government funded programs have not been very effective, what makes anyone think that terrorists could come up with an effective delivery system.
  • by khasim ( 1285 ) <brandioch.conner@gmail.com> on Sunday April 09, 2006 @08:08PM (#15096806)
    Say your neighbor gets pissed off enough to
    want to play god. He get your hair, engineers a weapon and the next
    thing you know all your family is dead and noone else notices. That's
    what genetic targeting allows (potentially, but I am sure it'll be
    practical in not too distant future).
    So the pathogen would have to target a very specific ... DNA/RNA sequence?

    What happens when the pathogen mutates? Lots of little virus babies mean lots of chances for mutation.
    Also, think KKK developing a color-of-skin based agent.
    Again, this isn't magic. This is science. To kill based on skin colour, the virus would have to target a very specific DNA/RNA sequence. Viruses mutate. The mutations aren't controlled. One mutation and your virus is suddenly attacking the wrong breed.
    You could exploit local cuisine so that only people who eat, say sushi die.
    Sure. Whatever.
    Aha, now you are
    seeing the problem.
    Yes. The problem is lack of decent education in the field of biology.

    In order for your tailored viruses to work, they'd have to be able to only infect people with a certain DNA/RNA sequence, and that isn't very easy outside of the cell.

    So, your virus has to infect everyone, but only kill those with the sequence you've targetted.

    So, everyone is infected, with a deadly virus, and viruses mutate ...

    It is so much easier and more assured to just buy a shotgun and do it yourself.
  • by ggvaidya ( 747058 ) on Sunday April 09, 2006 @08:49PM (#15096911) Homepage Journal
    Horror stories like this one [cryptome.org], or this one [cryptome.org], both written by Richard Preston.

    (The second link has an interview with Dr. Alibek)
  • Yeah, whatever. (Score:4, Informative)

    by khasim ( 1285 ) <brandioch.conner@gmail.com> on Sunday April 09, 2006 @09:09PM (#15096970)
    As someone who is doing research in molecular biology right now in a major US
    university (at a postdoctoral level), let me assure you a lack of decent edumacation in the field of biology is not the problem.
    Yeah, sure. Whatever.
    Once this technology becomes available to 14 year olds and doable with classroom equipment, all bets are off.
    At that point all the claims you've made have already been researched and, at least in the lab, developed.

    Seriously, I'd expect someone with your claimed credentials to understand the basics of this. This isn't cut-and-paste.

    You have to identify the exact DNA/RNA sequence that identifies your target.

    Then you have to engineer the virus to only kill the hosts with that sequence ...
    while remaining dormant in the hosts without that sequence.

    And you can't just cut-and-paste the sequence you want to attack into the virus. The changes to the virus would be a completely different research project.
    And let's not forget the people who are depressed and want to see their offender dead and they don't care about the world or themselves.
    And why would that person choose bio-tech over the conventional shotgun?
    And this is before we even mention terrorists and nation states which TFA was concerned with.
    Because chemical agents work so much more effectively, are easier to manufacture, transport and disperse.

    And even more effective than chemical agents are conventional weapons. Such as "hand guns" or "shotguns". Not to mention the ever popular "explosives strapped to your body".
  • by patio11 ( 857072 ) on Monday April 10, 2006 @02:38AM (#15097715)
    I wrote a research paper on Japanese responses to terrorism a couple of years ago. Here's what I remember from it. No warranty that any of the following is correct but, hey, do you get that warranty from Wiki?

    * The major failure with the attack was the lack of time to develop a good dispersal mechanism, as the attack plan was moved ahead of schedule because of the cult's impression that the authorities were going to act on them imminently. They had this impression on the basis of penetration of Japanese military and police sources. They eventually settled on liquid in bags getting poked with umbrella tips.
    * The "specific targets" at Matsumoto were judicial magistrates whom the cult thought had a hand in the investigation against them. Seven died in that attack, incidentally.
    * Aum was fricking scary with the amount of resources they had at their disposal. I remember a $300 million chemical weapons factory (operating completely above-board in Japan in broad daylight, just another chemical factory, had all its permits), and them staging a parachute raid on a JSDF facility using turncoat JSDF forces. Sounds like a bad anime, I know.

    I wouldn't be sanguine about this. If you can get weapons grade sarin you can certainly develop a delivery system for it. Its not trivial but, hey, $300 million dollars has a certain way of making non-trivial problems seem a whole lot less daunting. We lucked out in a major way, in that with everything designed right for the attack (high-profile target with hundreds of thousands of people in an enclosed space) the cult made multiple errors (impure toxin, dispersal surface area the size of an umbrella puncture, etc) which minimized the casualties. There were other lucky incidents, too -- two Japanese station attendants soaked up the chemical in one car with newspapers, sealed it in plastic, and took it to the station room (I don't know if they had any idea that they were dealing with anything worse than a liquid mess, but both of them died for their troubles, which many people from exposure to that portion of the attack).

    And, incidentally, remember the anthrax attack on the US and how the postal system and much of the East Coast essentially *shut down* with less casualties? Its difficult to overstate how much of the Japanese economy/government/everything is dependent on Tokyo and how dependent Tokyo is on their mass transit system. If you hit one car in Tokyo's inner loop with a lethal nerve agent tomorrow and then followed it up with a successful strike once a week for, oh, I don't know, two weeks? Three? That would be about as effective at causing economic damage in Japan as driving an airplane into a tall building of your choice in New York City.

  • Re:Oh goody (Score:3, Informative)

    by hey! ( 33014 ) on Monday April 10, 2006 @01:49PM (#15099835) Homepage Journal
    Once you have got your hands on a sample of virulent bacteria like Antrax producing them is a piece of cake.

    Actually, IIRC this is not the case. While it's easy to cultivate Anthrax, it is very hard to "weaponize" it: mill it so fine that it will spread on air currents as an aerosol.

    Which I take to be you point. But you make it sound like the hard part is putting it in some kind of warhead. That's relatively easy. It's not really any more complex than the IEDs they are using in Iraq.

    "Getting it right" when it comes to weaponizing a deadly infectious agent would be very, very hazardous to your health unless you were immune. Work on these agents would normally be done in a level four biohazard facility, and although a terrorist might be likely to take risks, mucking around with them without the training and equipment used in a level 2 facilty would probably result in an unintended release.

Prediction is very difficult, especially of the future. - Niels Bohr

Working...