MS Thinks OOo is 10 Years Behind 736
greengrass writes "In a recent interview with IT Wire, general manager of business strategy for the Information Worker Group at Microsoft, Alan Yates expressed the opinion that Open Office is at the same level that MS office was around 10 years ago. Supposedly only suitable for the single desktop, isolated user. After all, it doesn't even have an e-mail client!"
Re:Single, isolated users. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Unfortunately for Microsoft.... (Score:2, Informative)
Office 2000 has to be the biggest pain in the ass to get patched and kept up to date out of any piece of consumer level commercial software I've ever seen.
Re:Perhaps it is... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:What's the wizz-bang features it's missing? (Score:5, Informative)
Not a big thing for everyone, but essential for some.
Re:10 years behind? Sounds about right (Score:3, Informative)
I still would select Microsoft Office over OpenOffice.org on a machine that had both installed, purely for stability and speed reasons. Office is better optimized and rarely crashes. With the preloaders off, it takes 2 seconds to start Microsoft Word and 14 seconds to start OpenOffice Writer on my machine. (I've timed it.) I'm really not that fast a typist - I do about 60 WPM on average - yet OOo doesn't keep up with my typing. I can usually get through 3/4 of a line before the letters appear on screen. Menus are equally slow - it takes about two seconds from the time I hit Alt+Letter to when the menu is done drawing. I've also noticed fairly significant display corruption - parts of the screen that don't update until I resize the window, or random lines being drawn across the toolbar. Office (Office 2003, at least) doesn't have these glitches.
I acknowledge that these delays aren't that significant, especially considering that Microsoft is probably using undocumented stuff to speed up Office, but they're just annoying enough to make me uncomfortable using OpenOffice.org on a regular basis.
OOo is a good product, and I've recommended it to people who couldn't afford Office. They've all been fairly happy with it, though they do complain about some of the same glitches.
With a bit of polish, OOo can be a serious competitor to Office someday. I look forward to it.
(I do apologize for my incoherent posts - it's late for me.)
Re:No flight simulator either (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Gates knows best (Score:5, Informative)
I think Jakub Steiner would probably take offense at this statement. I mean, the dude spent all this time designing a huge set of icons [musichall.cz] for OpenOffice. Now, why OpenOffice doesn't actually uses them, that's another story.
Re:Maybe you should try Lyx... (Score:2, Informative)
Or do they?
Re:They think "Free Software" is "Spyware" too (Score:5, Informative)
He means it's "excellent - the absolute apex" (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Perhaps it is... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Maybe you should try Lyx... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Maybe you should try Lyx... (Score:3, Informative)
Quite simply, the TeX system was designed to typeset scientific papers written in English, which it does brilliantly. But for other tasks, it simply hasn't kept up with technology - as soon as you leave the core areas, it rapidly degenerates into layer upon layer of flaky hacks. The existence of LaTeX-generated Japanese PDFs proves that it's possible to get it to do what I want... but life's too short, and OpenOffice.org just works out of the box.
LaTeX beamer (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Perhaps it is... (Score:5, Informative)
I now generally use Abiword as my main WP on Linux, at least for first drafts.
?!?!? care to elaborate? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Maybe you should try Lyx... (Score:5, Informative)
Screenshot of Chinese/Japanese Unicode support [sil.org].
All the beauty of TeX, all the ease of unicode.
Re:Maybe you should try Lyx... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Maybe you should try Lyx... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Perhaps it is... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Well... (Score:1, Informative)
Yeah, it still sucks and it's 95% Sun, but at least there's a _bit_ of outside participation. And I hear the monstrous OOo build process is being cleaned up, so hopefully that'll improve the situation.
Re:Perhaps it is... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Single, isolated users. (Score:3, Informative)
But, then this doesn't qualify as Office, but as Exchange
I mean, I use thunderbird
Which has a standards-based calendar plugin. Granted, this doesn't quite provide the same features yet (except maybe with Kolab via synckolab [gargan.org]).
and I think office is way overpriced. But, for what it is, outlook 2003 is a pretty good business product. It's relatively secure (compared to past iterations), the shared calendar is easy to use (yes there are open source alternatives
Actually, the open-source alternatives would be Kolab+Kontact on the Linux side, or Thunderbird+synckolab or Outlook with a (proprietary) connector), or horde (which has full calendaring support for Horde). IMHO, web-only based tools don't count. In a while, Evolution and Kontact will likely be available on Windows too
but integration and ease of use are hard to match here), and with Small Business Server, the outlook web interface has a lot of Ajax and DHTML type features which make it look almost exactly like you're at your computer.
Except if you use a different browser. If you look closer, it's not just DHTML and Ajax, but one large dll which gets downloaded to the client machine on first use, and relies on insecure and proprietary technologies (ie ActiveX).
It's very well executed.
I wouldn't agree, it is quite poor under Firefox (ie no better than a run-of-the-mill webmail client from the 90s), which is why I avoid it (and use Evolution to access our Exchange server - I use kmail for our non-Exchange server).
Re:Perhaps it is... (Score:3, Informative)
A better idea would be a clear distinction between the main programs, and a plugin. I'm not sure if they've done it however, because I'm a vim+LaTeX guy (cue jokes).
Package openoffice-base, openoffice-writer, openoffice-calc, etc. etc. seperately, and then e.g. openoffice-commonplugins as an add-on package. All the rest could be seperated.
I believe Debian/Ubuntu does this already, but again I'm not sure if Open Office has 'plugins'
Re:Maybe you should try Lyx... (Score:3, Informative)
I started out using LyX like some of the other posters here, but I eventually just cut out the middle man and moved to plain LaTeX with vim as an editor. Get latex-suite [sourceforge.net] for vim - it makes things a lot easier and faster. It took a little getting used to, but is now quite simple to use.
Re:Just you wait! (Score:2, Informative)
MS Word word count feature (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=
This is the sort of thing that one could write a macro to accomplish, though.
Re:Gates knows best (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Perhaps it is... (Score:3, Informative)
I use Openoffice to fix corrupted word documents.
Word says it can't read it.
I open and save it to Doc format in OOo (it usually shrinks by a couple megabytes).
Now it opens in Word fine.
Word clearly needs some kind of "listen damnit- just read it in as best as you can so I can resave it" read mode.
Re:10 years behind? Sounds about right (Score:2, Informative)
Do you know how that compares to OOo's multilingual support?
Korean user here.
Generally speaking, MS does Korean better than non-MS overall, mainly because the computer usage in Korea(not speaking for China or Japan since I don't know) exploded with the use of Win98 or WinXP. It could be said that MS almost defined what CJK handling should be like.
I could go into details, but I'll leave it at that for now.