Tridge wins 2005 Free Software Award 117
johnsu01 writes "The Free Software Foundation has announced the winner of the 2005 Award for the Advancement of Free Software. The winner, Andrew Tridgell, wins the prize for his work on Samba, the Linux kernel, and rsync. In his work on Samba and on a free software client for the proprietary version control system previously used by the Linux kernel hackers, Tridgell furthered what has been an important goal of the free software movement since the founding of GNU --- analyzing ways for free software to interact with the currently widespread proprietary systems so people can more easily move away from those systems."
well done (Score:1, Insightful)
The FSF shows its true colors (Score:3, Insightful)
Tridge's work with Samba is certainly worthy of recognition. It's just the way in which the FSF chose to grant that recognition that I have a problem with.
Trying to find the detailed story... (Score:4, Insightful)
BUT, the real story is REALLY interesting...and I can't find it, now! The story talked about how he experimented with all of the bits and bytes to get the software to work. A lot of stuff in the beginning was hard coded and everytime MS released a new version, he had to rush to fix shit, until he figured out how things really worked.
Shit! I wish I could find that story again. It really explained how to reverse engineer stuff!
Re:The FSF shows its true colors (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:The FSF shows its true colors (Score:4, Insightful)
The open source community turned on McVoy. It never had a cooperative setup with Microsoft in the first place.
Re:Hmmmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Hmmmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Larry McVoy got a bunch of cheap advertising for his software, then he threw a hissy fit when someone tried to interoperate with it. He's a twit.
Reverse what? (Score:2, Insightful)
Which version of history are we now supporting?
Re:Strange Politics (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm not disagreeing that Tridge is deserving; it's just that the FSF chose to recognize him in part for work that advances their own political, anti-commercial agenda, and that is what I find offensive.
Re:Hmmmm (Score:3, Insightful)
Does the commitment extend to me, a user of Linux?
I doubt that OSDL or Tridgell knowingly agreed to any such commitment.
Re:The FSF shows its true colors (Score:5, Insightful)
Assuming you're not trolling, your argument is essentially a straw man. The reality is that the FSF is hostile to proprietary software, which should hardly be a surprise.
If the FSF were opposed to commercial software, I doubt the GPL (the current version, as well as the GPLv3 draft) would say this:
Re:Strange Politics (Score:2, Insightful)
Congratulations Tridge (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Free Software (Score:3, Insightful)
Cars are free in the sense that you can examine components and build your own extensions to them. You don't need permission from Ford to build and sell towbars for Ford cars.
Binary interfaces make this next to impossible with software.
Re:The FSF shows its true colors (Score:2, Insightful)
REAlly.
Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU project is that you should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that you should charge as little as possible -- just enough to cover the cost.
Actually we encourage people who redistribute free software to charge as much as they wish or can. (link [gnu.org])
So, straight from the horse's mouth, we can see your argument is bullshit, "period".
Re:Hmmmm (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:The FSF shows its true colors (Score:3, Insightful)