AIM Bots: Useful or Spam? 517
An anonymous reader writes "Imagine my surprise this morning when AOL AIM popped up a window and introduced me to two bots that it automatically added to my buddy list. " Two seperate issues- one is simply auto adding robots to your friends list, which is very uncool. The second is a corporation using bots in an official capacity. This is an interesting trend, although technically speaking, not that far from the eggdrop of old.
Meh. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Ever heard of GAIM? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Ever heard of GAIM? (Score:5, Informative)
Add me to the "immediately-deleted-and-moderately-annoyed" list.
Re:I'm just surprised... (Score:5, Informative)
In the US, that is. Here in Europe, IM seems to be almost exclusively MSN. Hardly anyone uses AIM this side of the Atlantic.
Re:I'm just surprised... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:AOL Intruder (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Ever heard of GAIM? (Score:2, Informative)
Not completely useless. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:The Next Step: Adding Artificial Intelligence (Score:3, Informative)
http://jaimbot.sourceforge.net/ [sourceforge.net]
Re:Not on GAIM, yet (Score:5, Informative)
Maybe its being pushed in phases?
Re:Meh. (Score:5, Informative)
Delete the group and close your IM client.
Now open it again and log back in. AOL messages you wondering why you deleted its bots, though they are not put back.
Now you're done. Damnit.
The bots didn't add you, AOL added the bots for yo (Score:3, Informative)
If someone adds YOU to THEIR buddylist, then you are notified. If YOU add SOMEONE to your buddylist, you are not notified (since you added them).
Here AOL added these two buddies to everyone's buddylist. This is easy enough since AOL has stored a copy of your buddylist on it's server for years. Clients connect and then sysnchronize the buddylist. The buddies showed up in your client durring the sync. As far as your client knew, you logged in on a different computer and added these two names yourself (thus putting them in the server-side buddylist). The fact that AOL added the names on your behalf is transparent to the client.
So that's why.
Re:Meh. (Score:2, Informative)
captcha:maskable
heh
Re:fighting with bots (Score:3, Informative)
(12:24:06) Unable to send message: Request denied
=[
Re:The bots didn't add you, AOL added the bots for (Score:5, Informative)
Not on AIM you aren't.
Re:fighting with bots (Score:2, Informative)
Rather than swear at it, I tried typing a smiley.
Bot: I didn't find any good matches 4 U, but may I ask you a question?
Me: No.
Bot: Mm hm. Such negativity. You are in need of some holiday spirit! Type M.
Me: Shan't.
Bot: OK, I'm searching for matches 4 U. Gimme a sec.
If you let it ask you a question, it goes into a kind of 'interactive' question and answer mode. It's easy to get stuck in this mode, with no obvious way to revert to generalized searches. The best way to get back to the 'top level' behavior (where it takes anything you type as a search keyword) is by swearing at it. There's a moral there somewhere, I suppose.
In the words of Marvin:
Re:AOL Intruder (Score:2, Informative)
Re:The bots didn't add you, AOL added the bots for (Score:3, Informative)
I guess this shows which one has better support for the protocol. ;^)