Original BeOS Developer Now at Trolltech 255
UltimaGuy writes "Benoit Schillings, co-creator of the Be operating system and former CTO of Openwave, has been appointed to the newly created position of chief technology officer (CTO) at Trolltech. In the meantime, Trolltech has also joined the new mobile OSDL initiative."
Issues With Trolltech Lower Excitement (Score:5, Informative)
Microsoft, Borland, etc. usually have an entry level version of most of their programming products (with which you can still write proprietary code) that is less than my car payment. Entry level on QT is more than my mortgage.
Yes, they support open source, but unless you're an open source coder or a well-funded enterprise coder, they basically tell you to F off. I don't like that and it detracts from any excitement I could have about these announcements.
- Greg
Re:license issues (Score:2, Informative)
Sure it does. It just doesn't allow you to distribute that code. You can sit down, write all the programs you'd like with the free version, test it out yourself, then switch to the commercial version when it's time to release.
Re:Trolltech.. (Score:5, Informative)
as aposed to people who troll for arguments which is
Re:Issues With Trolltech Lower Excitement (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Issues With Trolltech Lower Excitement (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Not exactly. (Score:3, Informative)
IANAL, this isn't legal advice, etc....
Re:A question on dual licensing (Score:5, Informative)
Re:license issues (Score:5, Informative)
Sure it does. It just doesn't allow you to distribute that code. You can sit down, write all the programs you'd like with the free version, test it out yourself, then switch to the commercial version when it's time to release.
This is actually *NOT* the case. As per the QT license, you must BUY the licence before you start coding the application.
Refer to the license FAQ: http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/index.htm
"Can we use the Open Source Edition while developing our non-opensource application and then purchase commercial licenses when we start to sell it?
No. Our commercial license agreements only apply to software that was developed with Qt under the commercial license agreement. They do not apply to code that was developed with the Qt Open Source Edition prior to the agreement. Any software developed with Qt without a commercial license agreement must be released as Open Source software."
Re:Issues With Trolltech Lower Excitement (Score:3, Informative)
It forces software vendors to share the source code, but does not prohibit vendors from selling binaries.
It's actually better than that. It forced the vendor to share the source code to the same parties with which they shared the binaries. In other words if you only have, say, half a dozen very trustworthy clients, or clients who would never even think to ask for the source code, then you're in a fairly good place.
On the other hand, it only takes one client with knowledge of the GPL to redistribute your code to the entire world... but that's another story.
Re:A question on dual licensing (Score:2, Informative)
Like today people installed and ran that pirated software, learned how to use it and when the
That probably still doesn't make sense.... one day...
It's actually a good name (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Someone's gotta say it. (Score:4, Informative)
Ah, yes, but the original developers of BeOS are still great engineers, so it's newsworthy to hear about their new pursuits. As a former BeOS hacker and an intern at Be in 1997, it's great to see what's happened to the various engineers that I used to work with. Dominic Giampaolo [wikipedia.org] is now at Apple where he is the chief architect behind Spotlight [wikipedia.org] and other cool stuff, and several Be engineers, including myself, are now working at Danger, Inc. [danger.com], the company behind the Hiptop/Sidekick [wikipedia.org] and Hiptop2 [danger.com] smart phones.
I remember Benoit as an über-hacker who wrote something like 50% of the original BeOS single-handedly. It was great to hear about his new job while I'm waiting for KDE 3.5.0 beta 2 to compile on my Gentoo box.
Re:Benaphores (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Issues With Trolltech Lower Excitement (Score:4, Informative)
Re:I wish (Score:3, Informative)
I wish you would learn what threading means and how it relates to what you can expect from the memory state of other threads if one of them crashes.
Re:A question on dual licensing (Score:3, Informative)
BTW, you'll get that same response from projects like GCC too. They require copyright assignment on all code, and they won't look at a (non-trivial) patch either.
And they have the same reasons.
Seriously? (Score:3, Informative)
Maybe because in some countries it's the yearly wage of said programmer?????? Hint: a high-pay programmer in my country makes circa US$ 10000/yr.
Re:I wish (Score:3, Informative)
"Thread-safe" means that an API can be used in two threads simultaneously without them interfering with each other. It does not mean that a process is protected from being killed when one of its threads causes a segfault or whatever. Qt is thread-safe.
What you are complaining about is not thread-safety, but the fact that Konqueror uses threads for separate windows and not processes. Unsurprisingly, this is configurable - go to Control Centre | KDE Components | KDE Performance, and change Minimise Memory Usage to Never. It sounds like you have it set to Always, which is not the default.