Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Corel

Corel Ousted From Public Life? 214

gagy writes "Ottawa's Corel Corp. has been showing signs of weakness in the past few years, and looks very likely to be bought out by Vector Corp, at which point it will become a privately held company. A Toronto Star story spells out the details of the deal, and takes a brief look at the history of Corel." We mentioned Corel's deal with Vector last month.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Corel Ousted From Public Life?

Comments Filter:
  • Corel (Score:5, Interesting)

    by MC68040 ( 462186 ) <henric&digital-bless,com> on Monday July 21, 2003 @04:46PM (#6493884) Homepage
    Well one would hope they will stay alive, even though they've been around for their fair share of trauma a lot of people actually use their products. The last company I worked for used corel office on over 1000 clients while the rest ran MS office...

    Corel's office actually had less support incidents of problems with the actual software, on the other hand, it was a pain because everyone was used to MS office and didden't understand the different GUI hehe.

    http://funstuff.digital-bless.com/ [digital-bless.com] - Funny stuff.
  • by TheRedHorse ( 559375 ) on Monday July 21, 2003 @04:47PM (#6493888)
    Word Perfect was an awesome product. I still use it sometimes too. Any hope of open source type port of Word Perfect? I'm guessing probably not. But you can always hope.
  • Vector Capital (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Surak ( 18578 ) * <surakNO@SPAMmailblocks.com> on Monday July 21, 2003 @04:50PM (#6493911) Homepage Journal
    is a vulture capital firm. This should be good for them. They already have a history with Corel, having bought Microsoft's shares at 56 cents a piece, taking a 20% stake in the company.

    CorelDRAW is still the best illustration package available for PCs today, bar none. Illustrator doesn't hold a candle, IMHO. (This from a guy with many years of experience with both packages in a professional setting).
  • Re:What a fall. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Trigun ( 685027 ) <evil@evil e m p i r e . a t h .cx> on Monday July 21, 2003 @04:51PM (#6493917)
    Kenneth Cowpland was the ultimate death of that company. They were following the embrace, extend and extinguish philosopy, unfortunately they never realized that it was the competition that they were supposed to extinguish, and not themselves.
    They killed WordPerfect. They let the entire graphics line die. They nearly killed the company when they put a big stake in developing a home computer which ran Java natively. They seemed to always have their heads too far into the future while their products stayed too far in the past.
    In short, it is absolutely amazing they stayed alive this long, depite complete and utter mismanagement. Good riddance to bad garbage.
  • by Lxy ( 80823 ) on Monday July 21, 2003 @04:53PM (#6493936) Journal
    Openoffice.org has a small branch (wp.openoffice.org I think) of developers working on it. WP offers a few features (reveal codes of course) that are slowly being added into Openoffice.org.

    One nice thing about WP is that the file format, AFAIK, hasn't changed since version 6.1. Create a document in WP11, open it in 7, and viola, it opens. Word can't even do backward compatibility, try opening a Word 95 doc in Word XP. It'll open, but you'll most likely have to reformat. Because o the file compatibility, the Wordperfect import filter for Openoffice.org is coming along very nicely.
  • by handy_vandal ( 606174 ) on Monday July 21, 2003 @04:55PM (#6493958) Homepage Journal
    Two interesting firsts, from the article:

    "... [Corel] became the first software company to bundle more than one program into a package. It also became the first to discount older versions, making them accessible for the more thrift-conscious consumer market."

  • by bigjocker ( 113512 ) * on Monday July 21, 2003 @04:57PM (#6493981) Homepage
    As I see it Corel lost a huge chance when they sold their whole Linux division to work with Microsoft on .NET.

    They had a set of great graphics/design tools, a wordprocessor with a decent user base and a decent Linux distribution. With the right management (visionary, willing to further the boundaries) they could have been a great company. But they decided to go conservative, keep selling their boxed products and use a few OEMs, kill their linux development and surrender to the .NET platform.

    Long live Corel, I would have wanted to have heard a lot more from them, but they had their shot and panicked.
  • Why not MS (Score:3, Interesting)

    by tsa ( 15680 ) on Monday July 21, 2003 @04:58PM (#6493996) Homepage
    I always wonder why they were not bought by MS because CorelDraw is a nice vector drawing program that is used by a lot of people to make pictures with that are then incorporated in a Word document. MS could have had WP and Draw in one nice package.!
  • Re:Corel (Score:4, Interesting)

    by KillerHamster ( 645942 ) on Monday July 21, 2003 @04:59PM (#6494007) Homepage
    Their GUI is definitely different than MS's, and though I haven't used it much, I really liked what I saw, especially of the latest version of WordPerfect. If I took the trouble to use it more, I'm sure I would come to like it more than MS Word... but then, I've already decided on OpenOffice. Still, I hope Corel stays alive and gives Microsoft some competition. BTW, Didn't some major OEM recently ship Corel Office pre-installed in place of MS Works?
  • by DesScorp ( 410532 ) on Monday July 21, 2003 @05:04PM (#6494055) Journal
    The Corel name, and product line, still have reputation enough to make the company a huge asset IF the right buyer comes along and makes good management decisions. Despite the popularity of OpenOffice among private users, most companies aren't going to adopt it, and Sun is having little success in marketing the professional sibling, StarOffice. WordPerfect, Corel Draw, Quattro Pro, and other apps still have good commercial name recognition and respect, and were a company like HP to come along and buy and distribute it, the Corel line could have a fighting chance. HP is already distributing Corel software with it's home-market PCs. If they were to do a true port to Linux of all the Corel line, it could really kick-start the Linux business desktop. And I mean a REAL port, not the Wine-dependant crap Corel was distributing years ago. And if someone like HP were to buy them, the Corel Linux distro wouldn't be a bad idea for a return either. Corel Linux had some nice features, and was Debian based. Much better package management that way. IBM wouldn't be in the market. They've already got one office suite, and are developing another Java-based suite. Sun has StarOffice. But with Corel going REALLY cheap, maybe they could be presuaded to buy anyway. Dare I hope that Apple might even have an interest? Probably not. Outside of the venture capital crowd gunning for it, a company like HP would be Corel's best hope of making a big return. The competition would certainly nice.
  • by asv108 ( 141455 ) <asv@nOspam.ivoss.com> on Monday July 21, 2003 @05:08PM (#6494079) Homepage Journal
    Well good riddens as far as I'm concerned. I started using Corel Draw! at version 3, it was revolutionary program for its time especially since for awhile it was the only decent package that ran on a PC. If you think MS has a lousy upgrade path, Corel use to extort its Draw! customers with unnecessary upgrades and buggy released. Coreldraw 6 was probably the last good draw release, while release 7 was the best for photo paint. Photo paint 7 was given a higher rating that photoshop 4/5 at the time by most magazines, but most photo shop regulars were wise not to switch or ran macs anyway.

    Corel has a strategy of buying successful products and turning them in to obscure POS's. Here is just a short list off the top of my head of products they still offer:

    • Fractal Design Painter (Amazing Program)
    • Kai's Power Tools
    • Wordperfect
    • Bryce
    I believe there are also a bunch of excellent products that were acquired and abandoned. If I remember correctly Kai's Goo (easy to use image editor) was extremely popular before digital cameras were common and another product called photo soap was pretty decent too. The "Kai" line of basic image editors and easy effects for the masses could have been insanely successful if Corel didn't touch it.
  • by Lxy ( 80823 ) on Monday July 21, 2003 @05:10PM (#6494102) Journal
    You're mostly trolling, but you have one valid point: Corel responded to MS pressure with crummy software and bad support.

    When we had trouble with Wordperfect 8, Corel was there by our side, offering every bit of help, giving us beta service packs, and doing everything they could to resolve our problems. We finally traced it to a fux0red MFC DLL (Microsoft issued), and Corel quickly gave us a fix.

    Wordperfect 9 was a solid product, mostly the result of their quickly responding developers. They fixed bugs as they found them, and for the most part didn't create any new ones.

    Wordperfect 10 was touted to be the most compatible with Word XP. Tried it, they're lying. Documents with even minor complexity don't convert well. I posted several troubled docs to the newsgroup, other users who claimed XP support was there couldn't open them either. I contacted Corel support, they were friendly but not very helpful.

    About a month ago I was troubleshooting printing issues with CorelDraw 11. Not only is this program not worth the upgrade, when I tried to contact support I couldn't get a good answer from anybody. The Knowledge Base has shriveled into a steaming pile of crap, and the only good support left is in the newsgroups. I was finally able to trace it to the print driver thanks to some good folks there, but Corel offered me nothing.

    Probably due to layoffs, Corel has been forced to produce a lackluster product and shoddy support. Microsoft won that round, their last remaining competitor is pretty much a non-threat.
  • Nah... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by fz00 ( 466988 ) on Monday July 21, 2003 @07:10PM (#6494915) Homepage
    What's really sad is that WordPerfect is a better product [emilhouse.com] than MicroSoft Office and few people realize it. It's cheaper, it's easier to use and it makes PDFs. But I think things are getting better for WordPerfect recently than worse. At least vendors like Gateway, Compaq and Dell are bundling these in their consumer and lower end models to cut costs for both themselves and their customers. This can at least help them survive. Also, I think in Corel's case it's good that they might go private. That way management can make decisions and not be at the whims of the market. Yes it's VCs but VCs are more predictable than the market.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 21, 2003 @11:23PM (#6496398)
    If you think MS has a lousy upgrade path, Corel use to extort its Draw! customers with unnecessary upgrades and buggy released.


    I disagree with your assertion that Corel extorted anyone, but you're right about the buggy releases. Like you, I started with Draw! version 3 and found it an extremely nice program to use. Then came version 4, and they might as well have kicked me in the jimmy for all it was worth -- talk about crap software!

    Also, I'd like to correct you on the 'last good Draw! release'. The last good Draw! release was version 9. It's (mostly) unbloated and includes a few fairly useful utilities.

    MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL -- Draw! 9 is a veritable swiss army knife for pre-press operators. It will open most (if not all) of the popular raster or vector image file types, will render better postscript than Adobe Illustrator, and is generally the most useful thing you can have on your computer if you're using a PC in the pre-press world.

    I'll be sad to see it go. I much prefer Draw! over the alternatives: Freehand and Illustrator.
  • Re:What a fall. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Bullard ( 62082 ) on Tuesday July 22, 2003 @01:49AM (#6496941) Homepage
    It is sad to see such a turn of events. The only thing that can make it worse is if some SCO like low lifes buy the company for a few pennies and start suing people at OpenOffice.org or KOffice.org. Ofcourse, M$FT and even SUN will pay money to those companies to make sure "they respect IP rights."

    According to another post here [slashdot.org] a group of Corel people claim that Microsoft arranged this whole farce to bury the company so you weren't that far off the target. The only difference is that MS seems to have their lackeys buying the company to avoid being sued. And to protect Office marketshare of course. I don't what Sun would do with Corel, although WP might have some useful code to contribute to StarOffice. But is Sun serious about StarOffice in the long run?

  • by Anonymous Bullard ( 62082 ) on Tuesday July 22, 2003 @03:34AM (#6497305) Homepage
    I appreciate their work on WINE but other than that, good riddance, you danced with the devil and now you have to pay the price. Let this be a lesson to anybody would thinks MS is their white knight.
    It's funny but the ones actually paying the price of Corel's expedited funeral are the users of Corel's products and especially the shareholders who have been trying to talk some sense into the blindly pro-MS management [corelrescue.com].

    If there's a lesson here it's one where the management of a public company can be threatened and bribed to do Microsoft's bidding in order to keep their jobs a little longer while everybody else loses. Mr. G. W. Bush should be real proud of his appointee John Ashcroft's laissez-fair approach to antitrust violations.

The one day you'd sell your soul for something, souls are a glut.

Working...