Dell To Offer Windows-Less PCs 588
An anonymous reader submits: "As a follow-up to the Slashdot story Dell No Longer Selling Systems w/o Microsoft OS, News.com is reporting that Dell will sell systems without Windows. Microsoft's new licensing terms stipulate they can't sell PC's without an OS (hence the removal of the NoOS option), so Dell will be offering FreeDOS as an option for some computers. It will come with the computer, but not installed, so that users may install any other OS that they wish. It's a very creative interpretation of Microsoft's licensing terms, and one I imagine Microsoft didn't have in mind."
Two key points from the article (Score:5, Informative)
2. They're aimed primarily at large companies and won't, for the most part, be available to consumers via Dell's web site. (their workstations will, but not the generic line of optiplexes.
Given point 1, I fail to see how this is a Big Deal, other than the obvious snub at Microsoft.
--kurt
Re:Why not Linux then? (Score:3, Informative)
It was this final option that MS's new policy removed. Dell now simply uses FreeDOS as a loophole to replace the third option.
Re:Why not Linux then? (Score:3, Informative)
Connectix do something similar with VirtualPC for Mac. They sell various ludicrously expensive editions with different Microsoft operating systems and then they sell an el-cheapo, electronic download, version bundled with PC-DOS.
No-one wants PC-DOS, but if you just want the plain app to install your own OS on it, that's the cheapest option. It allows them to stick to Microsoft's anti-competitive policies, but still give people the choice to do what they want.
The installer even has an "Install Application Only" option so you don't even have to delete PC-DOS afterwards
Let's face the facts (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Go Dell! (Score:5, Informative)
IBM gave them the OS-monopoly on preinstalled IBM-PCs back in 1981.
After that, they just followed the industry and were late on every computer related motion there was. The GUI, multitasking the transition to 32 and 64 bits are things where Microsoft was always very late. Bill Gates assured us in 1993 that he's not interested in the Internet for example.
That's pretty much it. Everybody would have made billions with that monopoly. actually Microsoft are not evil genuises, they are just lucky and pretty incompetent.
Of Course..... (Score:2, Informative)
Put a clause in their EULA that states that consumers could get refunds for installed copies of Windows if the consumer disagreed with the license, only to turn around and violate that license when the consumer requested his refund.
Name their PDA operating system in such a way that an abbreviation forms a word for a reaction to pain.
Fake a demonstration of how badly Windows is impared when Internet Explorer is removed for an anti-trust trial, and get caught.
And Microsoft would absolutely, positivly, not spend a couple hundred million marketing their upcomming consol system only to find out that someone else owned the trademark.
Yes, Microsoft thinks of everything.
;)
You're still paying the MS tax (Score:2, Informative)
Dude, you're goin' to Hell! (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Same price for both systems? (Score:5, Informative)
From the consent decree [usdoj.gov], IV.C: "Microsoft shall not enter into any Per Processor License."
Its not the Microsoft License (Score:3, Informative)