funny, I don't see that one on the officially approved list at opensource.org

> For instance, for under $100 you can get an AMD x4 with a top end of 3.8ghz or more

That's precisely why AMD is fighting for survival. It has to price it's products into bargin bin area to make any sales. That's good for the consumer, but not good for AMD

WebGL is a recognised standard, implemented by Mozilla, Google, Apple and Opera. Weither it's W3C, or not is irrelevant, as it happens it's the only way to get native 3D graphics in the browser.
All new standards have had security holes. The answer is to patch the holes. (Duh)

Widescreen is good for watch movies and playing games. 4:3 is for people who need to do work on their PC.

so, if Microsoft is so great at web standards where is the support for WebGL?

I wonder what type of projects would need to tweek the jvm. I am assuming it's huge java web based enterprise applications.

I suggest Eclipse IDE for JavaScript Web Developers: http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/packages/eclipse-ide-javascript-web-developers/heliosr
and Chromium Eclipse Debugger: http://code.google.com/p/chromedevtools/

Everyone else seems too busy engaged in the language flame war to answer your question

It seems a lot safer than the x-ray backscatter system anyway. Basically they are microwaving the passangers, but only a little bit ;)

And how were we supposed to avoid risk when the most risky stuff was rated AAA at the time?