Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Linux vs. NT Reliability

Posted by CmdrTaco on Sun Feb 13, 2000 10:44 AM
from the stuff-to-think-about dept.
buckrogers writes "Bloor Research has finished a year long study that shows that Linux is more reliable than Windows. In the study Linux failed once for four hours because of disk drive issues while Windows failed 68 times for "hardware problems (disk), memory (26 times), file management (8 times), and a number of odd problems (33 times)" for a total of 65 hours. I like the category "odd problems." "
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Linux vs. NT Reliability | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 299 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2 | 3
(1) | 2 | 3