Sign up for the Slashdot newsletter! OR
check out the new Slashdot job board to browse remote jobs or jobs in your areaDo you develop on GitHub? You can keep using GitHub but automatically
sync your GitHub releases to SourceForge quickly and easily with
this tool so your projects have a backup location, and get your project in front of SourceForge's nearly 20 million monthly users. It takes less than a minute. Get new users downloading your project releases today!
I'm honored (Score:2)
Hahahahaha (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Previously you were exhibiting fear over the demonstrated fact that your insatiable desire to overthrow the POTUS could well lead to the extralegal execution of the same.
Are you sure you're not a closet Ron Paul supporter? Your style of argumentation is indistinguishable [youtube.com]. I say this in all love, with a hint of a smile, of course.
Re: (Score:1)
Laughing [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
OMG!!!1!! (Score:1)
You have shown that you want Obama out of the white house at any cost.
You must know about the contract with Marvin the Martian to use the Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator to obliterate the planet, rather than suffer this diabolical twerp to do Yet Another Dumb Thing (YADT)!!!
*gasp* [hyperventilation] I'm [hyperventilation] caught [hyperventilation].
Please just stay beautiful in 2014. Is that so much to ask of you?
if you're trying to show maturity... (Score:2)
What you have written already shows how deeply you despise any politician with a (D) after his or her name, and how desperate you are to shorten the presidential administration of anyone with that evil mark. Mocking me does not do anything to make you look more sane or rational. When people are so readily willing to discard the rule of law to get their political wishes they don't aid their own cause when they try to reduce those who respect the law into carto
Is this your idea of quid pro quo? (Score:2)
to reduce those who respect the law
At least we can be sure your not speaking of President Obama there. :-)
That statement indicates endorsement of extralegal means for getting rid of people who you merely think broke the law. Funny, I recall a certain conservative recently tried to play the "abuse after molestation" card; and now we see a conservative who is actually endorsing such a strategy. How far are you willing to go to dish out revenge when you see yourself as having been wronged? Do any laws apply to you once you feel hurt? What is the minimum level of offense that you feel you need to be able to co
Re: (Score:1)
That statement indicates endorsement of extralegal means for getting rid of people who you merely think broke the law.
That's what you say. You're, again, freely throwing subjective interpretation into a negative statement that any reasonable reader would agree intends to show that President Obama affords the law all the concern he does, say, a urinal cake.
You're entitled to your subjective interpretations, sure, as I am entitled to laugh at them.
How far are you willing to go to dish out revenge when you see yourself as having been wronged?
Why, I should have to grow a vengeful heart first, would I not?
Do any laws apply to you once you feel hurt?
Now, I grasp that the Left specializes in hormone farming; in sowing resentment, to reap power.
What is the minimum level of offense that you feel you need to be able to convince yourself to having had happened in order to justify to yourself the suspension of laws to seek revenge?
Have you considered l
Re: (Score:2)
That statement indicates endorsement of extralegal means for getting rid of people who you merely think broke the law.
That's what you say
Wrong. It is what you have said. You have repeatedly refused to reject the use of extralegal methods to remove President Obama. You have demonstrated over and over again that you are 100% OK with a mob forcing him out of office - and by way of your approval you are also OK with the mob doing with him what they will.
You're entitled to your subjective interpretations, sure, as I am entitled to laugh at them.
You have endorsed throwing out the POTUS by any means available. This is not merely an interpretation, it is supported by what you have actually written here.
How far are you willing to go to dish out revenge when you see yourself as having been wronged?
Why, I should have to grow a vengeful heart first, would I not?
You have demonstrated a vengef
Re: (Score:1)
Wrong
Ooooh, bold font! This is what you say I've said, but you've interacted, inferred, built upon, extrapolated, and repeated your piffle. It's unclear whether you:
a. actively think you're correct, as a matter of belief, or
b. are driving for troll train for some unknown, experimental reason, or
c. are recreationally beclowning yourself, as a matter of habit
d. are melting down into some kind of paranoid ravings, as 2014 promises to be another "average"* year for Mr. Obama.
But your ravings in no way accurate
Re: (Score:2)
But your ravings in no way accurately portray my views
Ravings? Hardly. Your views are clearly willing to accept forceful removal of the POTUS (provided, of course, that said POTUS is not of your political party). You have endorsed such an action repeatedly now and rejected it not once. You have also shown that you don't even care which conspiracy theory leads to the removal of Obama, as long as he is thrown out. You are happy to jump between conspiracies A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, and (at the very least) K as directed to do so by the media; you will t
Re: (Score:1)
Your efforts to accuse me of redefining terms and them using them strangely is wholly erroneous and nefarious. Is it your intent to kill all discussion between us?
Re: (Score:2)
equality of opportunity for all citizens,
That you just laid claim to. At least, not under the current understanding of "equality", "opportunity", and "citizens".
But in comparison to your deep and repeatedly stated goal of unseating the POTUS at any cost, your aim to deprive equality of opportunity is pretty minor in consideration of the change that it would likely bring about to the current situation in this country.
Is it your intent to kill all discussion between us?
My i
Re: (Score:1)
My intent is to understand what you actually mean, when you say something other than it.
That does not comport with your strawmen-on-acid approach to constructing an argument, if such matters to you.
Re: (Score:2)
My intent is to understand what you actually mean, when you say something other than it.
That does not comport with your strawmen-on-acid approach to constructing an argument, if such matters to you.
That is a very strange way to admit that your goals support terrible things happening to people who have not been given a chance to defend themselves in a fair trial. Your statement here has a similar relation to your strange previous contortion of the concept of opportunity - however considering some of your recent monologues about anatomical features that seem to attract your attention I guess it shouldn't surprise me that you would consider the vagina that one crawls out of to be a qualified way to det
Re: (Score:1)
My point, which seems to have angered you deeply this time, is that tea party goals are not compatible with the notion of
equality of opportunity for all citizens,
That you just laid claim to. At least, not under the current understanding of "equality", "opportunity", and "citizens".
You're a liar. (No shock or surprise, here.) The Tea Party stands explicitly for equality of opportunity for all citizens. You have zero evidence to the contrary.
your aim to deprive equality of opportunity
You're a liar. No such aim was ever expressed by him.
Re: (Score:2)
equality of opportunity for all citizens,
That you just laid claim to. At least, not under the current understanding of "equality", "opportunity", and "citizens".
You're a liar. (When we twist the concept of liar here) The Tea Party stands explicitly for equality of opportunity for all citizens. You have zero evidence to the contrary.
When you de-regulate and privatize education, you remove equality of access to it, and opportunity is lost. The Tea Party (and many other conservatives including yourself) endorse whole-heartedly doing exactly that.
Re: (Score:1)
Maybe you should look up William Daniel Johnson...
Re: (Score:1)
Don't be stupid. PLEASE try. Harder.
I can name all sorts of racists and communists and worse associated with the Democrats. Hell, that last school shooter was a hardcore progressive who spouted Nancy Pelosi talking points, and he actually shot, and tried to murder, people. Did he represent Democrats? Of course not. So, again, please stop being ridiculously stupid.
Re: (Score:1)
I can name all sorts of racists and communists and worse associated with the Democrats.
Did I say there isn't? Your tea party is nothing but a dixiecrat revival. And unlike the reference I gave you, I doubt the school shooter was invited anywhere by Nancy Pelosi. You sure got your panties in a bunch, that's for sure. Quite the money shot...
Re: (Score:1)
Did I say there isn't?
Yes, essentially.
Your tea party is nothing but a dixiecrat revival.
You're a liar. What's weird is you know you're lying and you know everyone knows you're lying. So why do you persist?
I doubt the school shooter was invited anywhere by Nancy Pelosi.
So? Let's talk about the Democrat who was in Congress, invited by the Democrats to participate in Democratic presidential debates, who was a good friend and supporter of Nigeria's terrible dictator, Abacha. Carol Moseley Braun was invited by Pelosi and the Democrats to all kinds of events.
Or what about disgraced corrupt federal judge, Florida Congressman Alcee Hastings?
Re: (Score:1)
Did I say there isn't?
Yes, essentially.
Really?? Fascinating how easy you put words into other peoples' mouths. For me it is so obvious that it goes without mentioning. I am amused that you think that your idols are any different. Anyways, thanks for the material. It will serve me well...
Yet you think this one guy at one local Tea Party event means something for the entire Tea Party.
And he is one of many. Your facade is crumbling. Face it, my friend, you really don't have to hide behind it anymore. Let your freak flag fly. Learn to be honest with yourself, and then others.
You're a liar.
Ah, ever so reliable you are :-) As always, thanks for the laughs.
Re: (Score:1)
Fascinating how easy you put words into other peoples' mouths.
I'm not. You're singling out the Tea Party for your stupid guilt-by-association game. If you did this equally to all groups, then you would not find this to be exceptional. The very fact that you're singling out this group means you don't do it equally to all groups.
There's at least as many racists in the Democratic Party and on the left, like Lynne Stewart, the terrorist just released from prison, who is virulently anti-Semitic.
I am amused that you think that your idols are any different.
As I have none, I wouldn't know.
And he is one of many.
You're a liar. It is extremely hard to find
Re: (Score:1)
As usual you infer things that don't exist (and ignore the things that do), deceive, lie, whatever you want to call it, I'm not impressed. I only contradicted your claim that your people are different from the rest. I singled nobody out. That would be your department, as you are showing here throughout. Indeed the liar is you. And the only one you are fooling with your lies is yourself. I'm not falling for it. But don't let that stop you. Maybe, some day, you might be able to parlay your schtick into someth