Journal Bill Dog's Journal: why Obama thinks ISIS shouldn't be called Islamic terrorists 4
I was tipped off, in another's journal, to the line of thinking involved here. Obama simply thinks that "there is a bit more nuance at work".
I was tipped off, in another's journal, to the line of thinking involved here. Obama simply thinks that "there is a bit more nuance at work".
"there is a bit more nuance at work" (Score:1)
Sounds like the standard argument used to shut everybody up. Mr. Smith is a frequent user of the term, and I'm sure it comes in handy for you too when convenient. I, mean, you know, that's how we rationalize blockading Cuba while selling the store to Saudi Arabia... "Nuance" keeps the Russians out, doesn't it? Rest assured, my dear friend, their market share in the region is down dramatically over the last five years.. You're watching the circus, they're counting the money. You're not even in the same game.
Yes there is a bit more nuance at work (Score:2)
But it's useless to deny that ISIS is Islamic. And it fails to take into account the central problem of reading scripture as your only authority. Of course, THAT is something Obama doesn't want anybody to look closely at.
Re: (Score:1)
Is that because Obama is such a solid Christian? <rolls eyes>