Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

New Linux PDA Available

Posted by michael on Sat Sep 22, 2001 12:58 AM
from the things-to-lose dept.
Jacob writes: "I just ran across an article about a new Linux-based PDA called the Powerplay III Linux PDA. The PDA is manufactured in Taiwan but is being sold by Canadian Linux company, Empower. This PDA is Palm IIIxe compatible (dragonball processor), is shipped with Empower's Linux DA O/S, and get this: its only $89! I'll be getting one..." We mentioned this operating system a few weeks ago. They now have some sort of source download available, which seems like a step in the right direction.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • its all about the price (Score:1, Offtopic)

    by dgp (11045) on Saturday September 22 2001, @01:02AM (#2333566) Journal
    $89! whoho. maybe that will put palm in their place with their 1000% markup on a little lcd screen attached to a 68000 with batteries.
  • by trentfoley (226635) on Saturday September 22 2001, @01:11AM (#2333577) Homepage Journal
    Ok, cool device - runs linux, comes with apps, cheap, very cheap! But, does the statement "Palm IIIxe compatible" mean you can flash Palm OS on it? My wife would love a PDA, but isn't exactly "bleeding edge". She has troubles with Windows, let alone X. So, is this a budget alternative? Or, is entry-level Handspring still the best bet.
  • 6 to 8 Weeks For Delivery (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 22 2001, @01:15AM (#2333582)
    The web site says 6 to 8 weeks for delivery. The product documentation is sparse. I'm not sure if I'd be willing to order from these people just yet. I love the idea of it, but the lack of documentation on the product makes me wonder if it is real or not....
  • License Agreement? (Score:2)

    by Ledge Kindred (82988) on Saturday September 22 2001, @01:16AM (#2333584)
    Have you seen the license agreement to download the "SDK"??

    http://www.linuxda.com/download/SDK_agree.html

    Seems like all those restrictions just maaaaaaaybe against the GPL...

  • by glenkim (412499) on Saturday September 22 2001, @01:21AM (#2333591) Homepage
    I just checked the web site, and they don't have any actual PDAs for sale at the site store just yet. Oh well.
  • Interesting Idea (Score:2, Interesting)

    by VertigoAce (257771) on Saturday September 22 2001, @01:25AM (#2333597)
    A cheap Linux PDA is certainly an interesting path to go, but there are some issues based on that data sheet:

    "6 month Linux DA O/S software upgrade" - This better be a stable OS if you only get 6 months of upgrades (setting aside whatever license restrictions there are)

    8MB RAM and 2MB flash seems a bit small. Doubling the RAM wouldn't be very expensive, but you'd see a large performance increase (speaking from my work with the Agenda VR3). I'm not suggesting that Linux can't run in that space, but it might prevent much in the way of third party applications (assuming that it doesn't contain any software on a ROM chip).

    For the price, however, it would be a good choice for a regular user (read: non-hacker). Most of the people who use it probably won't care that it's Linux anyway.

    -Sean
  • by trentfoley (226635) on Saturday September 22 2001, @01:25AM (#2333599) Homepage Journal
    Summary of features . . .
    Palm IIIxe Compatible
    Supplied with Linux DA O/S for PowerPlay III
    Processor: Motorola Dragonball, 16 MHz clock rate
    8 MB RAM
    2 MB Flash (upgradeable)
    Serial port for connection to PC
    Expansion slot(s): none
    Battery: non-rechargeable AAA cells
    Color Available: "Galaxy Grey"
    15 Days technical support by email
    6 month Linux DA O/S software upgrade
    One year warranty
    Includes: Carrying Case, 2 AAA Batteries, PC Sync Cable, CD with PC, Sync Program, Quick-Start Manual, Handwriting Guide, Warranty Card, Registration Card


    See??, it includes a "CD with PC"!
  • by BierGuzzl (92635) on Saturday September 22 2001, @01:30AM (#2333606) Homepage
    The OS is not under that license.
  • ooooo (Score:1)

    by laymil (14940) <laymil@obsolescence.net> on Saturday September 22 2001, @01:33AM (#2333611) Homepage
    personally, i don't feel that linux is the best OS for this application. however, to each his own. the $89 price tag makes this quite an appealing purchase. However, the anemic amount of RAM seems to be an important downside. Oh how i long for a PDA that can take the place of my laptop. Or at least one with a respectable amount of storage. bah.
    • Re:ooooo by kilgore_47 (Score:1) Saturday September 22 2001, @03:39AM
    • Re:ooooo by tzanger (Score:2) Saturday September 22 2001, @03:09PM
      • Re:ooooo by laymil (Score:1) Saturday September 22 2001, @04:35PM
        • Re:ooooo by tzanger (Score:2) Sunday September 23 2001, @09:12AM
    • Re:ooooo by laymil (Score:1) Saturday September 22 2001, @10:38AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • by psych031337 (449156) <psych0@NOspAm.wtnet.de> on Saturday September 22 2001, @01:37AM (#2333616)
    ...over and over again! I just don't get it.

    What I am crying for actually is a larger display. I know it is supposed to be palm compatible with its 160x160 square screen.

    But what keeps them away from enlarging the display into the "graffiti" write zone? This gives roughly 1/3 more display area, for easier data display and email reading and and and...

    Admitted, it would confuse the normal Palm user, but how hard is it to program a "softkeyboard" which just displays the graffiti zone at users will? And how hard is it to grab written graffiti from all over the screen? The answer to both: "not very".

    The softkeyboard ist just a matter of display in the lower display area and the all-screen graffiti zone is something seen on a lot of palm today that run ScreenWrite (shareware hack).

    So?
  • what the hell (Score:1)

    by toaster13 (36774) on Saturday September 22 2001, @01:43AM (#2333623)
    for $99 including shipping, i bought one. I always said palms were cool but I couldn't justify spending so much money on them. Now i can't justify not having one.
  • No MMU, so it's really ucLinux (Score:2, Informative)

    by Jay Carlson (28733) on Saturday September 22 2001, @01:52AM (#2333632)
    The Dragonball CPU used in here doesn't have an MMU, which means that you don't get all kinds of things like memory protection, demand paging, fixed address executables etc. Oh, no fork() either. No glibc, so porting gets harder too.

    Don't get me wrong; ucLinux is still very cool, but it's not in the same league as the Agenda VR3, VTech Helio, or mono iPaq. Of course, they're all at least double the price....
  • blah (Score:1)

    by talonyx (125221) <mike.sollanych@g ... m minus language> on Saturday September 22 2001, @02:06AM (#2333649)
    That better be $89 Canadian.... I could go for a linux machine.

    How do you enter text, etc? Graffiti style? OSD keyboard?
  • by faster (21765) on Saturday September 22 2001, @02:26AM (#2333673)
    I use a Palm sporadically, and it does what it's supposed to. I don't do much with its TCP stack, but I would expect a Linux PDA to be able to make a PPP connection for ftp, ssh (telnet?), and maybe even to hook up to a remote file system (palmfs, anyone?).

    What does a Linux PDA buy me? I haven't seen lists of apps for it, is there a reasonably up-to-date ssh implementation? Can it run Palm apps (my timesheet probably isn't available as a Linux app)? Does it run any popular interpreters (Python, Perl, how about awk)?

    If it doesn't have more than buzzwords, it probably won't have a positive impact on my productivity...

    But for $89, I can always flash it back to PalmOS if it doesn't work out for me, right?
  • screen size? (Score:1)

    by Hadlock (143607) <chad DOT hedstrom AT gmail DOT com> on Saturday September 22 2001, @02:27AM (#2333674) Homepage Journal
    i'm guessing being a 3x clone, it'll have the standard 2 1/2" screen, instead of the rather small screen of my m100....25% at that size is a huge difference. I'm curious though, i have a copy of a palm OS rom, 4.5.....would I be able to flash the linux rom with a true palm OS (for testing purposes only, of course ; )

    a linux palm sold mainstream is neat, but this is hardware compatible only . you still aren't getting the huge benifit of the palm os, which is the infinite supply of quick, useful and more importantly, FREE programs out there.

    now you might say 'but this is nothing more than a simple organizer, it's not made to emulate game boy games and various other things, it is simply an electronic address book and datebook', it is, that's what my palm is used for for 90% of the time also, but i also enjoy the versatility of the (shudder) mainstream os, and it's ablity to download play with a new gam at will. avantgo is handy also. i think palm os program compatiblity would be a huge step up.

    i'll probably get one anyways, the concept of programming and modifying the kernel of a device like that is too apetizing for me not to : )
  • Looks like (Score:1)

    by VFVTHUNTER (66253) on Saturday September 22 2001, @02:53AM (#2333701) Homepage
    its based on the uCLinux [uclinux.org] project - its got 2MB flash, 8MB RAM, and its a Motorola Dragonball, all the same as the uC project.

    So when is linux gonna run on PIC's and Atmel AVR's? :) It runs on D-balls, StrongArms, MIPS, I'm sure soon stable ports will exist for the PSX and the PS/2....the only thing really missing on teh embedded front at this point are development tools...that said, the GPASM and Atmel tools for Linux are quite nice.
    • Re:Looks like by tzanger (Score:2) Sunday September 23 2001, @09:20AM
  • by melted (227442) on Saturday September 22 2001, @03:12AM (#2333714) Homepage
    Are you sure you'd better buy Linux-based PDA just because it's linux-based and cheap? It will be your toy for a few weeks, and then you'll be desperately trying to sell it to somebody. OS and (to some extent) price don't matter here. These little things should be USABLE first of all. And if you need something usable NOW (not a couple of years later) - you'd buy either palm or pocketpc. Don't make a mistake. Define your priorities first.
  • something doesn't seem right (Score:3, Interesting)

    by mj6798 (514047) on Saturday September 22 2001, @03:16AM (#2333718)
    I downloaded the Linux source from their site. It seems to be some kind of derivative of uClinux [uclinux.org]. Whether they have made any useful modifications is hard to tell. In any case, they certainly don't seem to be interested in a high quality release or community input: there is no documentation, not even a README. To top it all off, the kernel tarball has a 7.6M core dump from "netscape-commun" in it.

    Altogether, I'd stay away. If you want a nice, functional Linux PDA, take a look at the Agenda [agendacomputing.com]. HP also will be coming out with a real Linux PDA.

  • by kingdon (220100) on Saturday September 22 2001, @03:41AM (#2333741) Homepage
    Well, I don't know about anyone else but for me my PDA is very much a utilitarian tool - I do my playing on a regular computer. So I looked at Linuxda.com [linuxda.com] (noticed it wasn't open source, but neither is PalmOS), and then found the screen shots [linuxda.com]. First reaction is that the screens are a bit on the ugly side (although not terminally so), and that it passes some kind of sanity test of functionality. Hard to really know, but I can always hope that this will fulfill my dream of an appliance which Just Works (like I say, I futz around enough with my regular computer, and I don't regret that time, but I don't necessarily want that times 2).
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by nordicfrost (118437) on Saturday September 22 2001, @03:46AM (#2333749)

    I work for an online newspaper here in Norway, and I wanted the paper to test the first Linux PDA, Agenda. So I wrote to Agenda Computing asking for a press kit and a demo model. This was half a year ago. They haven't shown us a model yet, only e-mails assuring that it will be sent "next month". So, is Agenda dead?
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by vanguard (102038) on Saturday September 22 2001, @04:01AM (#2333760)
    I've been using my Palm Vx for over a year now. I've been using Palm Pilots for about four years. I like them but I think I've bought my last Palm.

    Next, I get to thinking about the Linux alternative. I like Linux, I've been using it for years, so I want to give it the benefit of the doubt. However, it has non-rechargable batteries, and they actually advertise "paint" and "CPU Speed" on their list of applications. For me, buying this would be purely an act of Linux patriotism. Perhaps a worthy idea but I don't have the extra cash for that.

    Now I'm far from a Micro$oft lover but look at what they are doing. [zdnet.co.uk]

    • 802.11b
    • VPN access
    • video playback
    • audio playback
    • e-book reader
    These are exactly the sort of things that I would love to add to a PDA. I can surf the web and read word docs from anywhere in my house, yard, or office. I guess asking for it to be small, have a rechargable battery that lasts a week, and to include a cell phone would be too much. Still, it seem like MS is going to own this market whether I like it or not. The good news is that the seem to be doing it by building the best products (according to me).
  • by wrinkledshirt (228541) on Saturday September 22 2001, @04:33AM (#2333780) Homepage
    I've been thinking about getting into PDA development for a while. I was wondering, with a machine like this, what skills would it be good to know in order to develop for it? Languages, toolkits, etc.
  • by andersen (10283) on Saturday September 22 2001, @04:36AM (#2333783) Homepage
    My goodness. It is sure nice that they invented this. I would hate to think that they simply downloaded the kernel and sources from cvs.uclinux.org [uclinux.org] and from here [uclinux.org] and then claimed that they wrote it all... That wouldn't be ethical, now would it?

    If I was Jeff Dionne, the guy who actually ported Linux to run on Motorolla dragonball processors, I think I would be very pissed off to see these people claiming they are "The first Linux compatible O/S scaled down for the Motorola Dragonball CPU platform."

  • No expansion slot? (Score:1)

    by BlueLightning (442320) on Saturday September 22 2001, @04:38AM (#2333785) Homepage Journal
    Well, at first look the price does seem very impressive. However, for a brand new unit, I find the omission of an expansion slot somewhat glaring. I know I would definitely have paid extra for it.
  • by Hacksaw (3678) on Saturday September 22 2001, @05:24AM (#2333835) Homepage Journal
    I went to download the the demo for Palm Vx, and it's in .exe format. Argh.

    I sent them a missive of complaint. You should too.
  • Canadian, eh? (Score:1)

    by mrfiddlehead (129279) <mrfiddlehead@yBO ... o.uk minus berry> on Saturday September 22 2001, @06:15AM (#2333859) Homepage
    They claim to be a company based in Redmond Washington, but it appears to be a front for a company that is actually based in Richmond, BC, just north of the border (Canada is north of the US just about everywhere in case you were wondering, and for those geographically challenged Yanks out there.) Check out 'whois linuxda.com' for details on their actual base of operations.

    I'm not sure if I need these guys/girls and their product. Not because they're Canadian, rather because I don't want to use a Palm clone running under linux. Me, I'd like to see a console window or X display above the CR field, not all those ugly Palm style buttons.

    We hates Palms. Overpriced crap, really.

  • Something weird (Score:1)

    by The Evil Dwarf from (17232) on Saturday September 22 2001, @06:22AM (#2333864)
    I tried to order one of these things and got an error generated by their page. I wouldn't think too much of this normallly except this is spuuposed to be a "linux" site and this is part of the error message:

    The error occurred while processing an element with a general identifier of (CFIF), occupying document position (276:4) to (276:104) in the template file D:\wwwroot\stargate\htdocs\cfm\linuxda\shipping.cf m

    The specific sequence of files included or processed is:
    D:\WWWROOT\STARGATE\HTDOCS\CFM\LINUXDA\SHIPPING. CF M


    Why is a "linux" site running on a windoze server?
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Cheap, but... (Score:3, Informative)

    by kdgarris (91435) on Saturday September 22 2001, @06:41AM (#2333871) Journal

    ..if you want a real Linux PDA, the Agenda VR3 [agendacomputing.com] is the way to go. It's designed from the ground up for Linux, and 100% open-source.

    I just recieved mine a few days ago because I thought it would be a cool toy, not expecting it to to useful as a PDA. Fortunately it is useful for both, however. If you've read negative reviews of the VR3 indicating otherwise, keep in mind that the system has improved greatly since the initial release.

    A few good and bad points to keep in mind if you're thinking of getting one:

    The good:

    • Small form-factor and lightweight (About the size and weight of a Palm V series PDA)
    • All software is open-source and upgradable (kernel, base system, included apps, etc)
    • Regular free updates from Agenda Computing
    • Active development community
    • Easy to use (knowledge of Linux not required)

    The bad:

    • Short battery life (uses 2 AAA's that last about 2 weeks under normal use)
    • Only 3.5 Megs of read-write user space (the 10 MB system rootdisk can be customized, however)
    • Sync software for Windows users not very mature (just released recently)

    -Karl

  • Info (Score:1)

    by gabeman-o (325552) on Saturday September 22 2001, @07:16AM (#2333890) Homepage
    Where exactly does this website give a drop of information on the PDA? All I see is "Linux PDA" on the front page and the PDA itself in their online store.
  • I'm Not A Fan (Score:1)

    by TheBlueOne (523670) on Saturday September 22 2001, @10:17AM (#2334106) Homepage
    Look at that thing. It's truely a disgrace. It looks exactly like a palm but it has 2 more buttons in the graffiti area. It's really just copying palm, which has been attempted before. I also remember reading a news article about linux for the Palm, though they hadn't made a version compatible with the IIIc is why I didn't get it. I have since sold my 3c and have gone with the ipaq h3650. It's a solid handheld other than the windows part of it. It's somewhat light, it does enough color for what I need, it has a fairly good speaker, earphone plug, and IS compatible with linux. Did I forget to mention the sweet 206 mhz processor and 32 mb ram? Oh, and while we are on the topic of processors, I seem to remember a palm having that same processor. What did they do, take a palm and put a different cover on it and call it their own model? Come on everyone, lets get atleast SOME originality. The Linux DA os even LOOKS like palm, and I haven't really been happy with the small screens and software of palm. They aren't even multitasking. Also, from what I hear, the Agenda has many good qualities too.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by libertynews (304820) on Saturday September 22 2001, @10:37AM (#2334175) Homepage
    So are these things overstocked/extra palm devices with a new case and software? For the price, I'd bet that's what they are.

    Has anyone actually touched one of these things? How similar is it to a Palm III?
  • by Perianwyr Stormcrow (157913) on Saturday September 22 2001, @11:20AM (#2334297) Homepage
    For 89 bucks, and it's the equal of a palm IIIx? Hell, my visor doesn't even have flash memory.

    If the hardware's palm-compatible, one could, I imagine, grab the rom out of a real IIIx and jam it in there. rock.
  • by DataGrok (81077) on Saturday September 22 2001, @11:32AM (#2334326) Homepage

    I'm one of the "good software can make up for cheap hardware" camp. Flame on, whatever.

    I'd probably buy one of these. If the introductory price is $89, that means it could fall, too.

    I speculated that something like this might occur when PCChips [pcchips.com.tw], a motherboard manufacturing company that creates a lot of cheap, sexy form factor all-in-one boards, released their EPD30 [203.161.230.38] model PDA. I purchase PCChips motherboards exclusively for use in my machines, and if this PDA is one made by them, I'll definitely purchase it, to support my favorite cheap-ass hardware manufacturing company. It certainly looks similar, from the one tiny picture I've found of it.

    One reason I'm fond of PCChips is that they tend to use hardware that is standardized and usually has had its documentation published by the manufacturer. (SiS advertises themselves as "supporting linux".) Which means it's only a matter of time and code before it can work with an open-source operating system, and you don't get locked into using bastardized proprietary shit that you have to kowtow with an open wallet at some big industry CEO to get at. And if you have the skills, you can improve the way your system works just by writing and installing software.

    Looks like it comes with a hotsync cable, not a cradle. Cool! I'm all for cheaper products through less extraneous plastic.

    Does anybody have a more thourough review or better pictures of the hardware?

    -Mike

    Yes, I'm a masochistic software developer with a cheap hardware fetish. You probably wouldn't understand.

  • Business use (Score:2)

    by Fjord (99230) on Saturday September 22 2001, @12:19PM (#2334585) Homepage Journal
    A lot of people on here are say that there are no apps, and why would you buy one of these. I haven't been a big proponent of linux PDAs for home users. However, businessed have a needs that involve to rolling out PDAs to their employees, and in these cases, linux PDAs are the best fit. Since there is little licensing involved in the OS, they can typically beat a Palm or CE device by $50. When you have to roll out to a couple hundres people, that can make a difference, especially with todays budgets. Since the software typically has to be custom built anyways, the number of native applications doesn't matter. In fact, sometime less apps is better, since people are then using their PDAs for their work.
  • OK, here is my first impression... (Score:3, Informative)

    by javabandit (464204) on Saturday September 22 2001, @03:31PM (#2335188)
    I just installed the LinuxDA demo on my Palm IIIxe. Here are some observations.

    First off, The demo is very annoying. About every 15-20 seconds, a message that takes up the entire screen pops up and says, "LinuxDa... a demo copy for limited use... blah blah". I seriously don't think this stuff is GPL. Their license is on their site here [linuxda.com].

    Second, the UI sucks. I'm not sure why Linux UI implementations have to be so cumbersome. But this one is no different. The drop-down menus are hard-to-control. Often times, selecting a drop-down menu item requires several taps. The UI is 'Palm-like', but it fails horribly in a few key areas of navigability.

    Third, I have sent an email off to LinuxDA asking them if they have a shell interface to the RAM filesystem. The demo doesn't have one. Their 'full' version doesn't appear to have one, either. I also asked about whether or not LinuxDA has a TCP/IP stack, or ethernet support. Again, I saw nothing like that in the demo or in the specs of their full version.

    So far, my conclusion is thumbs down. I don't like it. Yeah, its Linux, but it sucks right now.

    If they give me a shell. If they give me a TCP/IP stack, and ethernet support... then I'm on board. I'm not sure what good Linux on a handheld is without those three things.
  • by shibboleth (228942) on Saturday September 22 2001, @05:40PM (#2335545)
    Why does the OS matter if you only get apps? Or do you get a command line? I didn't find mention of that in the article or their website.

  • by mailuefterl (140499) on Saturday September 22 2001, @06:03PM (#2335611)
    This is not the first Linux PDA we're promised.
    I remember Yopy, which made me drrol just with the bare specs. But what has happened to the Yopy in the meantime? Does anyone know? I'd still love to get one (but a production version, not the developer kit !)
  • by darp (181922) on Saturday September 22 2001, @11:40PM (#2336662)
    Is this truly 240x320? Screenshots look like 160x160. The review may contain false info.
  • by DarklordJonnyDigital (522978) on Sunday September 23 2001, @05:33AM (#2337211) Homepage Journal
    Color Available: "Galaxy Grey". Heh. I love the name of that processor [imdb.com] too... ka..me..ha..me...ha... [planetnamek.com] ;)

    Despite what /.'ers have been saying about this particular model, a Linux PDA at this price actually sounds pretty interesting. 320*240 screen res, Motorola processor, non-Windows operating system... it's like Amiga [amiga.com] all over again ;)

    I still think that PDAs are primarily marketed for business use, though, when there's a huge nerd market waiting to be tapped.

    I mean, just looking at the picture of the PDA, it's so obviously a business device - apps shown in the screenshot include Memo, Schedule, and what appears to be a minesweeper clone. When would you ever use something like those on a PDA? I wanna see a USENET reader, a mailer, Telnet, Lynx, perhaps even a text editor and FTP combo so I can write my weblog [btinternet.co.uk] on the move...

    At $89, it's competing with the GBA [btinternet.co.uk] for my hard-earned cash and Pokémon [btinternet.co.uk] vs Minesweeper really is no contest...

  • 49 replies beneath your current threshold.