DotComGuy Survives His Year 66
blurzero writes: "Remember DotComGuy? The Texan who decided to prove that people could buy everything they needed through e-commerce by locking himself in his home for an entire year, and Webcasting the entire thing? Well, DCG made it through all 366 days! F*ckedCompany.com, however, is reporting that DCG's sponsors have all dried up, and he will be receiving none of the $100,000 he was supposed to be paid. There's no word on the DCG homepage." This guy would have been a lot braver to try this 10 years ago. Seems like the only real problem for the modern online hermit expecting $100,000 is enough room to exercise.
Not too bright... (Score:2)
At least he has a marketable skill now. He can teach other shut-ins and agoraphobics how to survive off of the 'Net...
Kierthos
me too! (Score:4)
Um, "exercise?" (Score:1)
See you in hell,
Bill Fuckin' Gates®.
Re:Not too bright... (Score:1)
Re:Um, "exercise?" (Score:1)
Well, of course he can't get a sponsor... (Score:1)
Attention kinda dried up (Score:2)
Sponsors Dried Up? (Score:1)
http://www.dotcomguy.com/whopartners.html
Seems that he has plenty of sponsors.
--
so what? (Score:1)
I hope that for your sake though, you did sign some sort of agreement, so that you can take those wonderful sponsors to court. But heck, they'll probably just claim bankruptcy, and you're even more screwed, with the lawyer fees and everything.
--I have to leave my house, its called university...crap!
I can just imagine it... (Score:3)
Reporter: DotComGuy, how do you feel finally being out after 12 months locked in your house?
DCG: 1t f33lz 1337. tH1s r0x0rS!
Reporter: And what do you have to say to the people who may contemplate emulating you in the coming months.
DCG: d0n't 3v3n t|2y d00dz. 1'm 1337, 1 w1ll 0wn j00!! 1'll h4x0r j00r b0xes!!
Reporter: "Haxor", "elite"? Sir what do you mean by this?
DCG: 1'm 1337, 1 d0wnl04d3d 13 g1gz 0f w4r3z 0ff my 1337 c4bl3 c0nexi0n!
Reporter: Right...
____________________________
what about SlashDotGuy instead? (Score:3)
Here's a few other interesting ideas for *Guy projects that people could try out and see if they can get a sponsor.
SpendMoneyGuy - guy shops for one year straight and spends lots of money. Follow his shopping adventures online and view his credit card bills online. Review his bank account balances and credit rating.
UpdateLinuxGuy - guy spends one year constantly updating sponsor's linux distribution with latest source from freshmeat. Go online and view the output of 'ls -lR
ReinstallWindowsGuy - goy spends one year constantly reinstalling windows and all of the required apps on the computers of various users
WriteCodeGuy - guy spends one year writing code for sponsor's company. Sponsor provides an 8'x8' cubicle and computer and a fridge full of cola.
PumpGasGuy - guy spends one year pumping gas at a gas station. you can go online and chat with him while he's not pumping gas.
WatchTVGuy - guy watches TV for one year. visit the website and watch him watch TV! Site has logs of all the TV shows he watches. Sponsor sells info to networks so they can determine what programs are popular.
Re:what about SlashDotGuy instead? (Score:1)
For instance in the case of the SpendMoneyGuy the viewers should be encouraged to phone in and tell him what items he should buy next time.
Why Is This Special? (Score:1)
Yet no one wants to give me a website or anything. Heh.
Duh! (Score:3)
Sponsors... (Score:1)
It looks like these people are just back-turning on him. I cannot imagine that these big named companies are going to go back on their word after a year of a man's life. I can see if maybe a DotCom Startup (TM) went bankrupt, but this is just rediculous.
No Documentation maybe not true? (Score:2)
If this is true why haven't any other large media sources reported on this like cnn.com or zdnet etc. The Media is loving every minute of the dotcom failures so I can't imagine it not reporting on a story like this. Someone earlier pointed out that there are plenty of his supporters left and I would have to agree.
I think Slashdot should have waited for more official documentation and/or resources that can be confirmed before posting this. I have a feeling they may end up retracting it. If anyone has any evidence to support this report could you please post it?
Re:Um, "exercise?" (Score:1)
F'cked company don't mince words (Score:1)
Stupid f'ckhead "Dotcomguy"
"
That's what I like to see, straight and too the point.
FP.
-- Real Men Don't Use Porn. -- Morality In Media Billboards
Not in Cyprus... ;) (Score:1)
No matter who your sponsors are...
Noone has a website, noone knows what Internet is, noone wants to work, noone delivers pizza, while it is warm at least
If you have any chance not to come here - use it
Most Useless Achievements Ever (Score:1)
Some weird guy spend 20 years typing the numbers 1 to some large value on his typewriter.
Kinda hard to insure that sorta thing against fire
Why doesn't someone just do NOTHING for a year instead hmm?
Geoff
_______________________________________________
dot com this (Score:1)
It could've been worse for the guy had they bombarded him for 366 days of William Shatner singing those annoying ass songs of his.
What he should've done is enrolled in one of those collegegirlsellingherassonacam.com and enjoyed those wasted days with better company.
SourceForge Spoof [antioffline.com]
Fuck DotComGuy (Score:1)
Here's a Better Link... (Score:1)
>It's been a great year everyone. Now it is
>time for DotComGuy to re-enter society. Can
>society handle it???
>From all of us here at DotComGuy Inc., and
>from DotComGuy himself, thanks to all of you
>for your support and appreciation these past
>366 days.
>Be on the lookout though...you never know
>what might happen next, or where DotComGuy
>will pop up!
--
Serves him right.... (Score:1)
Serves him right for trying such a crackpot sceme I think. Living using only the internet isn't difficult at all, if given unlimited funds, he was just the first moron with the idea to make a contest out of it, and change his name to something stupid.
It also serves the dried up dotcoms right for collapsing after making such horrible investments as DCG.
Re:Sponsors... (Score:1)
See you in hell,
Bill Fuckin' Gates®.
What really happened... (Score:2)
A stupid media stunt, and nothing more...or is it? (Score:1)
Nah. He would have been seen as an idiot. And he'd have been like the Biosphere guys.
I don't think he did a lot of exercise. Look at some of the banners of himself. He's pretty skinny. Then look at the latest little blurb picture of him on the front page. He's quite decidedly chunkier. All those Dominos pizzas no doubt.
There's things about this type of experiment that really bug me though. I mean, it's like someone's trying to find out exactly how far we can be pushed to become ultimate consumers (people who really produce nothing).
As nice as it may seem for various "hermits", who, besides rampant paranoiacs, REALLY want to lock themselves in their house for years at a time?
I can see it now.
Chas - The one, the only.
THANK GOD!!!
re: why not just spend a year doing nothing (Score:3)
Becuase when you do nothing, all you have to do is look at yourself/your life. Most people find this unappetizing and as such find other things, however meaningless, to occupy their time. If Buddha were alive today in America he'd be a gas station attendant (just a really, really enlightened one ;-) ). I think Mohammed and Christ would be video store clerks.
--
Re:Here's a Better Link... (Score:2)
He doesn't mean that there's no confirmation that he's leaving, he means there is no confirmation that he won't get paid his 100,000 dollars, which is not mentioned at all on DCG's site.
---There is no spoon....---
Re:No Documentation maybe not true? (Score:1)
he didn't get payed... or did he? (Score:1)
anyone?
Re:No Documentation maybe not true? (Score:1)
Slashdot never retracts anything. The most you could hope for is an [update] tacked on at the end.
Refrag
Re:No Documentation maybe not true? (Score:1)
Internet Start Up (Score:1)
"Starting Jan 1,2001 -- new dot com company starts, this company will have 365 days to turn a profit."
By the looks of things -- this will be more challenging right?
Clerks? (Score:1)
Obviously, (Score:3)
DotComGuy had his compound there (Richardson, IIRC). He's been plastered all over the tv news ever since it was discovered he was broke. I'll vouch for the veracity of this (I, in case you couldn't tell, live in Dallas).
The funny thing is that he won't speak on camera any more. I saw three different local news stations shoving cameras into his face, and whereas he was all over interviews when this started, now he just laughs bitterly and shakes his head whenever asked anything.
Funnier still is the fact that he's getting married to a woman he met online, but has never seen IRL. Yeah, this is going to work.
Also, maybe he should have ordered some workout equipment during the year. He looks really unhealthy. Maybe it's just the stress of being so broke and not being the media's darling anymore - in any event, he looks like hell.
Happy New Year, from a Dallasite.
Shouldn't he be DotOrgGuy? (Score:3)
I guess that could apply to dotcoms, too, now.
Re:Obviously, (Score:1)
No, it was in North Dallas, upper Greenville. 9310 Greenville Ave, to be specific.
The media here have been all over this guy. When even KRLD [krld.com] makes it their top news story of the day, something has gone horribly wrong. I remember last night that our Fox affiliate [kdfwfox4.com] was trying to interview him at his "coming home" party, and he barely said anything.
He met his fiancee in a chat room, by the way. For her sanity, and his I imagine, he'll be changing hs name back to Mitch Maddox (his chat room people would get mad when you said his real name in there, wonder why).
---
Escrow (Score:2)
Dotcomguy payment (Score:1)
Re:Not too bright... (Score:1)
Re:Sponsors Dried Up? (Score:1)
ReinstallWindowsGuy (Score:1)
"ReinstallWindowsGuy"
They already have this. Its called Desktop Support.
sigh...
Re:what about SlashDotGuy instead? (Score:1)
Re:what about SlashDotGuy instead? (Score:2)
newsflash! (Score:1)
Due to downturn in economy, dot-com stocks, DotComGuy drops DotCom, becomes just Guy, announces new business plan: working for a living.
Re:Yeah, but where do you rent hookers over the we (Score:1)
inside poop (Score:2)
The Bet (Score:1)
FAQ on the site (Score:1)
Is DotComGuy being paid?
DotComGuy, Inc., pays his salary, which began at $24 a month and doubles
each month until year's end.
Here's the breakdown:
Jan $24
Feb $48
Mar $96
Apr $192
May $384
Jun $768
Jul $1,536
Aug $3,072
Sep $6,144
Oct $12,288
Nov $24,576
Dec $49,152
Total $98,280
--snip--
I'd have bailed if I didn't receive a month's check.
Re:what about SlashDotGuy instead? (Score:1)
Have you no pride? You don't bother to even LOOK at what you've typed before you post it.
If you're a programmer, I'll bet it takes a half dozen iterations for your code to even compile.
Bah. I'd be more impressed if ... (Score:2)
Sponsors or not, you can live off the 'net. (Score:1)
Hell, I give this guy full marks for bravery, for being the first.
Re:Sponsors... (Score:1)
First of all, to the moderator who modded the above comment down as a troll: You are an idiot. I hope I catch you in metamoderation.
It's not really much of a shock when a corporation decides to screw someone out of some money. They all do it whenever they think they can get away with it. As others have pointed out, DCG ended up a little pudgy and a lot lacking in lovable personality. If he had been Mr. Charisma, they'd have a much harder time.
Re:The Bet (Score:1)
A man was thought to speak too much and was challenged to spend a certain amount of time in silence, living in a little room where he could constantly be monitored. He followed through, and at the end the wagerer was bankrupt. (and also didn't expect him to be able to win)
Of course, the Twilight Zone twist was that the man had his vocal chords removed after the bet was made.
--
steve
Re:me too! (Score:1)
Re:Why Is This Special? (Score:1)
Seriously. This sort of thing ain't exactly that difficult anymore.
"And for my next trick, I will...eat this sandwich! Followed by....some chips!"
[audience gasps]
Re:Sponsors or not, you can live off the 'net. (Score:1)
Bravery? This must be some usage of the word 'brave that I have never previously encountered.
Bravery is sailing a few POS ships to some land across the sea that may or may not be where/what you think it is.
Bravery is attacking a biker gang with a trout.
Bravery is not letting Amazon, Kozmo, and Homegrocer deliver all my stuff and getting paid for it. In my world, that's called paradise.
Some more info on this (Score:2)
Check this link on CNN [cnn.com]. Apparently the sponsors were contracted to pay for his internet purchases, which they did. In addition, he formed a company (DotComGuy, Inc.) that would pay him the $100,000. The tone of the article indicates the company was supposed to make money independent of the sponsors, but at the end of the year the company hadn't made enough to both pay his "bonus" and stay in business. Thus, he decided to keep the company afloat and forgo the $100K.
Re: why not just spend a year doing nothing (Score:1)
DCG (Score:1)
A No Brainer
the funniest part? (Score:2)
DotComGuy leaves house, sees shadow: Bush says six more months of market downturn to follow
FluX
After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network
Re:F'cked company don't mince words (Score:1)
I know it's cranky. I realised I was doing it, and it felt a bit weird.
"Try not to swear on Slashdot unless really wound up", is my maxim.
FP.
-- Real Men Don't Use Porn. -- Morality In Media Billboards
A Haiku (Score:1)
As the seasons pass
DotComGuy sits in his house...
God, what a huge fag.
exercise (Score:1)
I want to know.. (Score:1)
did he spend the entire year just sitting on his ass waiting for his "sponsor" to pay him, or did he start some shitty e-business and actually work some or all of the year??