Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Atari 800XL Used For Heart Diagnostics

Posted by Hemos on Sun Dec 17, 2000 09:06 AM
from the interesting-application dept.
fuxoft writes: "Even today, 8-bit Atari can save your life! This article (with photographs) reports that Atari 800XL is still used in one of the biggest Czech hospitals, for diagnostics of children with heart problems. Even here, in the Czech Republic, where the technology is not always 100% up-to-date, this is very weird indeed."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • Re:Pictures mirror. by *SECADM (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @05:15AM
  • woot! by djocyko (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:32AM
  • This makes a lot of sense by ghoti (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:34AM
  • by emil (695) on Sunday December 17 2000, @05:19AM (#553778) Homepage

    I understand and sympathize with the view towards old hardware of "don't fix what's not broken." We all get more than a little sentimental for the hardware we used in the "old days," however long ago that may be.

    However, the author was contacted because the equipment was malfunctioning. Since Intel hardware is so inexpensive, running this application on a P90 with Linux makes much more sense than using such an "exotic" piece of hardware.

    The Free Software/Open Source community should step up to the plate and port this application - it would be hard to conceive of a more valliant effort for our talents. I'd certainly be willing to do it.

  • Re:So what does this indicate? by taliver (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:35AM
  • Re:If it works... by Nex (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:38AM
  • Re:Czech resident counterstrike/comment by MR_DOE (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @07:12AM
  • Re:Just a though guys... by Gordonjcp (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:41AM
  • Re:Who volunteers to port this to Linux? by Pathwalker (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @07:12AM
  • The latest isn't... by ChaoticCoyote (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @07:14AM
  • Re:woot! by ZiS (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:42AM
  • Re:Who volunteers to port this to Linux? by Gordonjcp (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @07:18AM
  • Re:lol by Gordonjcp (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @07:20AM
  • Re:That's nothing! by Gordonjcp (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @07:24AM
  • Re:Stat by Ig0r (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @07:49AM
  • Re:It's not weird by Thorgal (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @10:33AM
  • Re:If it works... by Paul the Bold (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @10:47AM
  • Point/Counterpoint... by SvnLyrBrto (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @11:22AM
  • Re:This is great by Gregg M (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @11:36AM
  • This is why I bought a c64 by bedouin (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @11:59AM
  • Why Bother? by Quila (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @12:14PM
  • Re:It's not weird by mightbeadog (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @09:13PM
  • Re:Why Atari / US Government Property by HerringFlavoredFowl (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @12:48PM
  • Re:You are smoking crack. :-) by PotatoHead (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @09:18PM
  • Re:This is great by PotatoHead (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @09:40PM
  • Re:what will "old reliable machines" be in 10 year by PotatoHead (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @09:44PM
  • Re:I have a Atari 600XL.... by PotatoHead (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @09:48PM
  • Re:Heart monitoring with Atari is fine... by drsoran (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @05:21AM
  • by sbaker (47485) on Sunday December 17 2000, @05:21AM (#553803) Homepage
    In a sense, there is no problem with this - it did the job well when it was a brand shiney new computer - and it's still (presumably) doing the job well right now.

    The concern I have is what they do as these machines start to fail? Do they have a fallback plan? It seems that someone should be porting this key chunk of software to (say) a 386 :-) or at least getting *real* familiar with Atari emulators!

    So often, people wait until it's too late to do that port.

    I once worked in a company that used a BASIC program on 8088-based PC's to do a key realtime control operation in one of their products. When 8088's became unobtainable, they simply moved the code onto a 286 and discovered to their horror that it didn't work. Because this software had been written many years ago - and had never needed to be updated, they didn't even have a software engineer in that part of the organization (I worked in another division). They struggled on for a while buying up old 8088's second-hand and refurbishing them - but in the end, they called me in to rewrite the code.

    It turned out that the code had done all it's timing using empty 'FOR' loops (Ick!) - which of course ran faster on the 286's. That was a hard problem to fix because by the time they had me on board, they'd sold the very last 8088 they could lay their hands on and I had no way to figure out the lengths of those delays loops. In the end, I had to chuck out the entire program and develop a new one from scratch in C (using hardware timers
    and not empty 'for' loops of course).
  • Re:So what does this indicate? by Quietti (Score:1) Monday December 18 2000, @03:15AM
  • Just imagine what they could do with a PS2 by diphead (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @05:40AM
  • Re:Old Computers Never Die by shippo (Score:2) Monday December 18 2000, @03:19AM
  • Re:Atari 8-bits do well in Eastern Europe. by Junks Jerzey (Score:2) Monday December 18 2000, @05:04AM
  • Re:Who volunteers to port this to Linux? by RQ (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:49AM
  • Czech resident counterstrike/comment by Godfather_cz (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:50AM
  • Good Old Atari 800XL by andyf (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:56AM
  • Re:Atari? Bah! We had 64K RAM to your max 48K! by Pathwalker (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @07:53AM
  • DOD Sticker by Nybbler (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:57AM
  • Re:Stat by MR_DOE (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:58AM
  • Re:Stat by jgennick (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:58AM
  • Re:What happens when it breaks? by multipart/mixed (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @08:12AM
  • Re:So what does this indicate? by sheimers (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @07:00AM
  • You are smoking crack. :-) by StandardDeviant (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @08:22AM
  • Buying? by Skater (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @08:33AM
  • Re:It's not weird by Psibr2 (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @08:33AM
  • This is great by Gregg M (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @08:36AM
  • Damn Commie misinformation! by WebCowboy (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @01:06PM
  • what will "old reliable machines" be in 10 years? by sunhou (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @01:18PM
  • Java? by Defiler (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @04:21AM
  • by taliver (174409) on Sunday December 17 2000, @04:27AM (#553824)
    1) Maybe a 1.5GHz processor is not really necessary for any reasonable application.
    2) Instead of better processors, we simply need better algorithms.
    3) Instead of insisting that schools have the absolute latest computers, maybe we should make children try to do more with the systems they have.
    4) Maybe I should just shut up.

  • =) by ArKayDE (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @01:40PM
  • Oops! (Score:3)

    by laursen (36210) <laursen@net[ ]up.dk ['gro' in gap]> on Sunday December 17 2000, @04:22AM (#553826) Homepage
    Now we broke their last piece of technology by slashdotting their server!
  • Heart monitoring with Atari is fine... by MrP- (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @04:24AM
  • Stat by xp0rnstar (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @04:34AM
  • Just a though guys... by Gordonjcp (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @04:35AM
  • If it works... (Score:3)

    by Gordonjcp (186804) on Sunday December 17 2000, @04:26AM (#553830) Homepage
    ...don't fix it.
    Seriously, when was the last time you ever heard of unrepeatable bizarre crashes on the old 8-bit machines like this?
    I would be a lot happier with mission-critical stuff run on a ZX Spectrum than on any new PC.
  • Not only that... by Shoeboy (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @04:26AM
  • Re: stuck on a landfill leeching lead and PCBs by PunchMonkey (Score:1) Monday December 18 2000, @06:11AM
  • Re:Fscking Atari Spindoctors! by PyRoNeRd (Score:1) Monday December 18 2000, @06:21AM
  • Those smart commies by fm6 (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @02:58PM
  • Re:If it works... by Vajsvarana (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @04:40AM
  • It's not weird (Score:5)

    by rde (17364) on Sunday December 17 2000, @04:27AM (#553836)
    At the risk of sounding like an anti-consumer-society rantist, what's weird is that all these computers are being thrown out when they're still useful. How many people out there are using a PIII for surfing and a bit of word processing? How many 486s are thrown out each year because they're obsolete?

    The 800XL is a powerful computer. Not by today's standards, perhaps, but basic data-processing needs haven't advanced so much in the last fifteen years that the an atari, a ti99-4a or even the noble spectrum can't handle them. I'd have my doubts about a vic 20, but I've had those doubts for decades now.

    Personally, I'm delighted that these things are still being used, rather than stuck on a landfill leeching lead and PCBs into the ground.
  • hardware vs software by Pink Daisy (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @04:44AM
  • Re: Java? != big brother bill by hylo (Score:1) Monday December 18 2000, @07:16AM
  • SEE!? by Bill Kendrick (Score:1) Monday December 18 2000, @08:12AM
  • Re:Just a though guys... by ghoti (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @04:45AM
  • Re:Buying? by Bill Kendrick (Score:1) Monday December 18 2000, @08:30AM
  • Re:hardware vs software by wwwojtek (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @05:51AM
  • Re:If it works... by pmf (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @05:54AM
  • Re:This is why I bought a c64 by Bill Kendrick (Score:1) Monday December 18 2000, @08:32AM
  • Re:Just a though guys... by generic-man (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @05:54AM
  • Re:Those smart commies by fm6 (Score:2) Monday December 18 2000, @09:34AM
  • Re:Fscking Atari Spindoctors! by thechink (Score:1) Tuesday December 19 2000, @06:20AM
  • Re:That's nothing! by SIGFPE (Score:2) Tuesday December 19 2000, @06:46AM
  • Re:Pictures mirror. by taliver (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:02AM
  • Why Atari / US Government Property by dolt (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @07:01AM
  • Re:If it works... by camelrider (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @07:01AM
  • That's nothing! by SIGFPE (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @07:04AM
  • Re:So what does this indicate? by Psibr2 (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @08:39AM
  • Re:hardware vs software by Pathwalker (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @07:07AM
  • The Translator by dmaxwell (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @08:43AM
  • Real world devices us 8 bit CPUs by MountainLogic (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @08:58AM
  • Re:Good Old Atari 800XL by thechink (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @09:00AM
  • Re:This is why I bought a c64 by scottgfx (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @02:59PM
  • Re:Commodore 1750 REU gave me 640K, w/o kluging. by Pathwalker (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @09:21AM
  • Re:Damn Commie misinformation! by KikStart (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @03:11PM
  • in case of /.-ing (Score:5)

    by myster0n (216276) on Sunday December 17 2000, @04:46AM (#553861)
    The links go to the original JPEGS on their site - be gentle

    Atari in hospital

    I was contacted some time ago by some person asking me if I can help with repair or replacement of Atari 800XL for hospital. I was very curious about that, because it's known that Czech hospitals are in bad financial situation but I just wondered how they could use it at the end of the nineties. The person was kind enough to send me some details about setup and also sent me few pictures.

    Description
    It's used in child cardiocenter in Faculty Hospital Motol for the heart diagnosis. They are looking for uninvited leaks between two parts of heart. Principle is in injecting isotope in blood and screening its movement in vascular system of pacient.

    Usage
    1) Computer is started, program is loaded from cassette.
    2) Entering the data of patient (name, birthdate, height, weight).
    3) Entering the date & time of checkup.
    4) Entering the age of the isotope.
    5) Program computes the optimal amount of isotope.
    6) The probes are pointed to certain places of patient's body.
    7) Injection of isotope.
    8) For 5 minutes the program records the data from the probes.
    9) Saving the data to cassette.
    10) Disconnecting the gamma interface, connecting the teletype interface.
    11) Priting of the protocol to teletype.

    The checkup could be done by usage of other gamma camera, but it takes about 1 hour and the amount of isotope needs to be higher.

    Setup
    4 gamma probes
    plotter
    Atari 800 XL
    Atari XC 12 datasette with Turbo2000
    teletype T100
    interface Atari gamma probes (two joystick connectors)
    interface Atari teletype (one joystick connector)
    monitor

    Pictures
    (70 KB JPG) [slashdot.org]
    Detail of setup. Black box at the left behind is power supply for interface.

    (74 KB JPG) [slashdot.org]
    Overall look to gamma probes and plotter.

    (67 KB JPG) [slashdot.org]
    Detail of setup.

    (66 KB JPG) [slashdot.org]
    Overall look. At the left is teletype machine.

    (65 KB JPG) [slashdot.org]
    Overall look.

    (62 KB JPG) [slashdot.org]
    Detail of sticker on the computer. I wonder where did they got it.


    Atari pages accessed xxx times.Last modified: Wed Dec 6 13:33:40 2000
    (c) 2000 Jindroush [mailto]

  • Why Atari? (Score:5)

    by Mike Schiraldi (18296) on Sunday December 17 2000, @04:46AM (#553862) Homepage Journal
    I think an NES would be better - just think of games like Zelda, with built-in heart monitors. When you supply of hearts gets low, it starts beeping. Viola.

    --

  • Re:Old Computers Never Die by Some Dumbass... (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @03:54PM
  • hold on a sec (Score:3)

    by slashdoter (151641) on Sunday December 17 2000, @04:47AM (#553864) Homepage
    one second sir, we'll get to your heart attack in a moment but first we need to blow out the cartrage and the port it plugs in to....*beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee*


    ________

  • The 8088 is a 16-bit processor.......isn't it? by Atomix8 (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @04:36PM
  • This is a good thing by duncan (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @04:50AM
  • I have a Atari 600XL.... by Atomix8 (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @04:40PM
  • by gattaca (27954) on Sunday December 17 2000, @04:55AM (#553868)
    Name me one country in the world where there is as much money to spend on healthcare as people would like.

    If an Atari does the job then use an Atari. They're cheap. I wonder how many more patients in the UK or US could be treated if people didn't upgrade their computers/stethescopes/coffee machines etc. because they want something new and shiny, rather than because there's a good reason for it.

    Plus, it's probably pretty well debugged by now...
  • dodgy mirror by connect4 (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @04:55AM
  • Re:Stat by juhaz (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:14AM
  • Re:hardware vs software by helix_r (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:15AM
  • Re:Stat by sjames (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:25AM
  • Sticker on the Atari Information by bamberg29 (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:29AM
  • Re:So what does this indicate? by pecka (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:30AM
  • Re:How about a ZX-81 monitoring metan level ? by sales_worldwide (Score:1) Tuesday December 19 2000, @07:22AM
  • Re:How about a ZX-81 monitoring metan level ? by sales_worldwide (Score:1) Tuesday December 19 2000, @07:25AM
  • 16Kb of assembler! by sales_worldwide (Score:1) Tuesday December 19 2000, @07:27AM
  • nothing wrong with old equipment by Dr. Awktagon (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @09:21AM
  • Atari 800XL ports by 10.0.0.1 (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @09:36AM
  • Re:in case of /.-ing by hallkbrd (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @09:39AM
  • Replacement by Mike_K (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @09:46AM
  • What's with the other computer? by Deanasc (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @09:57AM
  • Re:What's with the other computer? by Deanasc (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @09:58AM
  • Re:This is great by IronChef (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @10:10AM
  • Re:Old Computers Never Die by Kreeblah (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @05:26PM
  • Re:This is why I bought a c64 by bedouin (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @05:59PM
  • Re:Stat by MichaelJ (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @06:41PM
  • by cluge (114877) on Sunday December 17 2000, @04:58AM (#553888) Homepage
    One thing that amazes me is that people want to junk perfectly good machines because it doesn't run the latest *whiz bang shoot em up* If it does what you want it to quickly, why must you junk it?

    Computer manufacturers are pushing the limits of technology, and the shortened life span of a computer and the development cycle is necessary to keep the tremendous growth that these companies now expect. (nee and so does wall street) This is great for us gadget people that always like the latest and greatest. It's not so good for companies that are forced to retire a substantial investment in hardware because it won't run the lastest MS WORD 2K sp1rev5.

    The affect these diminished "time to market" approaches has on quality of hardware and software is also readily apparent. (10 years ago how often did you need to flash the BIOS?)

    Isn't that one of the great things about Linux? Many people are running firewalls from an old 486 with mimimal RAM. Sure is much cheaper and "enviromentally friendly" (*groan* hate that phrase) than buying a new NT machine that you can bring to it's knees with check point.

    In the end if the equipment works for you, and if it's reliable then use it. The old atari's never crash, is it any wonder that it's in a mission critical application? Necessity is the mother of invention. Because that invention is old does not make the solution any less valid.

  • Sorry no Java but.. by pecka (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @04:59AM
  • Another use of the Atari 800... by Jonathan (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @04:59AM
  • Atari 8-bits do well in Eastern Europe. by Pentomino (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @08:20PM
  • Re:hardware vs software by Chagrin (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @05:10AM
  • Re:Those smart commies by jedrek (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @08:32PM
  • Re:If it works... by Detritus (Score:2) Sunday December 17 2000, @08:39PM
  • Pictures mirror. by *SECADM (Score:1) Sunday December 17 2000, @05:13AM
(1) | 2