Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

English, The Global Internet Language?

Posted by timothy on Wed Oct 25, 2000 07:15 PM
from the omnium-gatherum dept.
dsplat writes: "Atlantic Monthly has a story about the role of English as a global language. Most of the first two parts would be of interest only to a minority of Slashdot readers. However, the third part concerns the effects of technology on both the spread of English and the very nature of what we call English. It discusses the current uses of Machine Translation, Text to Speech and Speech to Text and the power of connecting the three. It also points out the error rates involved. Nearly every point made in the article was obvious to me, but I have both the background and the interest to follow a lot of it. The beauty of this is that it conveys this information accurately in a way that my parents could follow."

There are a number of interesting links there as well, including one to an interview with David Graddol of The English Company U.K in which he comments:

The type of language switching and word borrowing that typically goes on in any multilingual community is now happening on the Internet on a massive scale, and it is difficult to know what long-term impact this might have on the way the international community will use English.

The main article stated, "As has been widely noted, the Internet, besides being a convenient vehicle for reaching mass audiences such as, say, the citizenry of Japan or Argentina, is also well suited to bringing together the members of small groups -- for example, middle-class French-speaking sub-Saharan Africans." The two comments together paint a picture of various communities across the net infecting each other with their jargon as the members they have in common carry linguistic information with them from place to place on the net. Because the net is notoriously devoid of geographical places, the divisions are solely on the basis of interest and language. Sufficient interest will motivate the transfer of ideas, although I can't see how sufficient fluency will overcome lack of interest. That implies that those people who do not participate in online culture will be the last to adopt the linguistic innovations that spread from here. And conversely, we will adopt their linguistic creations only when they don't attempt to replace one of our own. After all, how many regular Slashdot users mispronounce "Internet" as "Information Superhighway"?

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
  • Re:Well... BASIC English by robertli (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @06:56PM
  • Re:www.esperanto.org by Prolog-X (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:52PM
  • Re:when in rome by robertli (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @06:59PM
  • Re:China! by spam-o-tron mk1 (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:52PM
  • Re:My parents would not follow by Jean-Michel Lee (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:53PM
  • Re:what is english? by robertli (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @07:08PM
  • Re:Why the disparity? by Alex Pennace (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:54PM
  • Re:China! by Han Hsin (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @07:16PM
  • Internet language Will Not Be English. by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @07:18PM
  • Re:A view from DejaNews by hilltop (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @07:24PM
  • Re:China! by Reality Master 101 (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:57PM
  • by uradu (10768) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:59PM (#675236)
    > Oops...I forgot. Typos are a strictly English phenomenon...

    Firstly, that was just a quip taking adavantage of the poster's misspelling(s) given the nature of the topic. Secondly, I didn't mention English per se, but rather American.

    I find it absolutely amazing how true the stereotype of American's poor spelling is. All too often I can deduce the American origin of posters simply by the number and nature of spelling mistakes. While there is a good number of British, Australian, Kiwi, Indian and other English-speaking posters untouched by any sense of syntax, their numbers pale in comparison to their American counterparts, both in terms of quantity and scope.

    I am sick and tired of the old excuse of content over form. Apologizing for one's poor spelling skills in a written medium is akin to apologizing for showing up with a hammer at a fishing competition. It might possibly get you some fish, but who dare endure the process of shame and misery? Poor spelling distracts the reader and undermines the message.
  • Re:"English" outdated by Luis Casillas (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @07:29PM
  • Re:Chinese not a candidate for World language. by Astastrafal (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @07:31PM
  • Re:China! by child_of_mercy (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:06PM
  • Re:Well... BASIC English by TeeWee (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @07:42PM
  • Re:China! by fluxrad (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:11PM
  • Why most Americans speak only one language by Some guy named Chris (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:12PM
  • c++ by fjordboy (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:17PM
  • Re:Why the disparity? by whovian (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:16PM
  • One thing to note... by Rusty Foster (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:20PM
  • Re:China! by -brazil- (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @07:55PM
  • Huh? (Score:3)

    by AntiTuX (202333) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:22PM (#675247) Homepage
    I thought perl was the Global internet language. :)
  • Re:China! by fluxrad (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:16PM
  • Re:China! by robertli (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:17PM
  • 200 years of english dominance in decline by corvi42 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @01:02AM
  • BASIC English? by xonix7 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @01:04AM
  • Re:when in rome by shogun (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @08:03PM
  • Re:c++ by Pheersum (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @01:30AM
  • English... by bmp (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @01:33AM
  • Re:Why the disparity? by brucet (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @08:05PM
  • In that case... by Chainsaw (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @08:06PM
  • by rve (4436) on Thursday October 26 2000, @02:00AM (#675257)
    English, Dutch and German were roughly the same language about 1000 years ago. English missionaries could travel along the north west coast of Europe trying to convert the heathens in their own language. In many ways English is a highly simplified version of German, with scandinavian, french and latin influences.

    Even though German, French, Italian and Russian are far more common as a first or second language inside europe, English evolved into the third language of choice, to replace latin and French for that purpose. In my view the advantages by far outweigh the disadvantages.
    The disadvantages are that since English is a living language, as opposed to Latin, native speakers have a strong advantage in education, and have less trouble getting their message accross to other people. (for example: Even though I am a scientist, an american intelligence test would probably classify me as a moron, because English doesn't come naturally to me, and my knowledge of the Anglo saxon cultural framework is limited)

    People don't hate 'English' as such, it is convenient to have a standard tool for communicating with people from other parts of the world.

    There is a lot of resistance against the attitude predominantly associated with anglo saxon culture (American- especially). It is a rare fusion of the Island mentality of the English, the evangelical attitude of the pilgrims and the empirial mindset usually found in superpowers (the Roman empire was a good example, so was the British empire, and so is the American empire now).

    Americans seem to assume by default that every sane human being would want to be an american deep down inside, and that people who don't are suspicious, enemies or freedom and security world wide. Other models of free societies are usually dismissed as primitive, contrived or indecisive. Even the posted article suggests that the USA is the only truly free society.

    Strong, often violent resistance against cola and hamburgers is often dismissed as religious fanaticism, anal retentive tendencies or downright jealousy, but the fact is that arabs really like being arabs, and they don't just pretend to, out of fear that Allah may otherwise strike them down. The French like being French, the Russians are proud of being Russian etc. I feel patronised and belittled when an American tourist asks me for directions in my city, and then corrects my grammar when I give them in his native language.

    We'd all get along a lot better if Americans (especially in politics and business) would stop viewing the world as made up of only two groups: flawed wannabe americans on one hand, and enemies of all that is good and holy on the other hand.
  • Re:Why English IS the global language. by Capt. Beyond (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:18PM
  • by ch-chuck (9622) on Thursday October 26 2000, @02:04AM (#675259) Homepage
    Back in the olde days an immigrant came to the US who could speak no English except 'coffee doughnut'. Every day he went out for breakfast, lunch and dinner and all he could order was 'coffee doughnut'. He quickly got sick of this diet, and finally met with a fellow countryman who could speak his language. This friend taught him the word 'steak'. So next time he goes into a restaurant and when the waiter asked him what he wanted, the immigrant proudly says, 'Steak!'. The waiter askes, 'How would you like it, rare, medium or well done?'. The immigrant looks puzzled for a few seconds, and finally says, 'coffee doughnut'.
  • Re:Huh? by brucet (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @08:16PM
  • Fine for business, but what about Govt? by ch-chuck (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @02:08AM
  • Re:what is english? by yuri benjamin (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @08:24PM
  • Re:Well... BASIC English by Clubber Lang (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:22PM
  • Re:China! by legoboy (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @08:24PM
  • This might change... by Hitokage_Nishino (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @08:41PM
  • Re:China! by Goonie (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:25PM
  • German, and ASCIII by Pseudonymus Bosch (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @02:17AM
  • Re:Why the disparity? by twinpot (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @02:18AM
  • Re:a point to ponder by potcrackpot (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @02:22AM
  • Re:China! by brucet (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @08:44PM
  • Rule, Britannia! by NetHead_OKC (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @08:45PM
  • Re:It ain't even the United States language. by b0z (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @02:29AM
  • Re:China! by brucet (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @08:46PM
  • BASIC English by Pseudonymus Bosch (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @02:32AM
  • Re:Well... BASIC English by twinpot (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @02:33AM
  • Re:In that case... by Moghedien (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @02:38AM
  • Re:Well... BASIC English by Throw Away Account (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:29PM
  • Re:China! by brucet (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @08:52PM
  • Relatively by Pseudonymus Bosch (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @02:47AM
  • We should all be speaking lojban by JapBusinessmanInA2-2 (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:30PM
  • Re:Not surprising by brucet (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @09:06PM
  • Re:A constructed in between language by brucet (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @09:11PM
  • Re:China! by child_of_mercy (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:36PM
  • Re:Chinese not a candidate for World language. by iMMersE (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:01AM
  • keyboards by brad3378 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:04AM
  • Friesish by Pseudonymus Bosch (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:12AM
  • Re:OCR of Asian languages is easy by iMMersE (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:13AM
  • Re:missing the point by brucet (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @09:26PM
  • Re:a point to ponder by uradu (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:14AM
  • Re:China! by Betcour (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @09:36PM
  • Re:Interesting point on English by brucet (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @09:39PM
  • Re:It ain't even the United States language. by Mononoke (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:18AM
  • Re:English is just a corrupt form of Dutch by JurriAlt137n (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @09:50PM
  • Re:"English" outdated by AntiBasic (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:39PM
  • Re:It ain't even the United States language. by Mononoke (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:21AM
  • Re:China! by JurriAlt137n (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @09:55PM
  • Re:a point to ponder by brucet (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @10:03PM
  • Re:BASIC English? by finkployd (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:22AM
  • Re:Official Religion by Mononoke (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:24AM
  • Re:english as a global language in one word: by brucet (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @10:05PM
  • Re:China! by Pig Hogger (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:42PM
  • Re:Chinese not a candidate for World language. by Betcour (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @10:11PM
  • Re:China! by nihilogos (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:43PM
  • Re:Torak- by brucet (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @10:16PM
  • Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:46PM
  • Re:a point to ponder by afc (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @10:32AM
  • Re:China! by corvi42 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @10:44AM
  • Re:Some international internet statistics by corvi42 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @10:52AM
  • Luxembourgisch? by Pseudonymus Bosch (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:24AM
  • UNL by Pseudonymus Bosch (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:27AM
  • Bilingual by h0tr0d (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @11:01AM
  • Re:Not surprising by iMMersE (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:27AM
  • Re:Well... BASIC English by dublin (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @11:06AM
  • Re:China! by ColdGrits (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @10:16PM
  • Re:Why the disparity? by finkployd (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:31AM
  • Re:Interesting point on English by Why Should I (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @11:26AM
  • Commands by Pseudonymus Bosch (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:34AM
  • Re:China! by reminor (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @10:35PM
  • Re:In that case... by Xavier (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @10:35PM
  • Lojban by Pseudonymus Bosch (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:36AM
  • Re:"Official" language doesn't tell whole story by dadragon (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @11:39AM
  • China! (Score:4)

    by Sleepy (4551) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:29PM (#675322) Homepage
    Face it, "English" really means US English.

    Westerners (I am one) typically base world languages against their own personal experience. That is, English to be #1, Spanish is #2, and French is a quaint but dying language (grin)

    I would not be totally surprised if China someday unseats the US as a world power, and having totally devestated their own country's ecology, they look to Sibera, Alaska, northern India and Russia for land to rape and "resettle".... like they are doing to Mongolia and Tibet.

    Chinese as a world language is usually dismissed on the bases that the concentration of speakers is localized - but what if they weren't? We're talking about over 1/4 of the world's people under the thumb of a dictatorship always looking to distract their people. As the population gets on the net and becomes dissatisfied, one could speculate that a nice diversionary war would fan the flames of nationalism (remember the near-riots after the US bombed the Chinese embesy in Yugoslavia?).

    More accurately, English is the world's BUSINESS language. I don't expect that to change in the next few hundred years however...
  • Re:China! by neuneu (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:53PM
  • I'll learn it if I need it by bluGill (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:36AM
  • Re:(begs the question) != (demands question be ask by grappler (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:56PM
  • Aargh! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:30PM
  • Re:Not surprising by Betcour (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @10:38PM
  • Re:Well... BASIC English by Zulfiya (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:40AM
  • Becoming multilingual by Gallowglass (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:45AM
  • Re:lEt as fIks INglIx! by mandolin (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:56PM
  • Re:China! by chrischow (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @10:46PM
  • English == Microsoft by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:35PM
  • Re:China! by chrischow (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @10:48PM
  • Re:Not surprising by wirefarm (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @05:58PM
  • Re:Well... BASIC English by __donald_ball__ (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @06:00PM
  • by Ribo99 (71160) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:37PM (#675336) Homepage Journal
    h4w h4w h4w!
    1337 sp34k0r1ng 15 4LL j0 n33d, 5ux0r5!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!


    ---
  • Re:China! by chrischow (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @10:52PM
  • More "AI" info by zurich31 (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @06:04PM
  • Re:when in rome by spyro (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @10:55PM
  • Re:Huh? by takemiya (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @06:05PM
  • Re:Huh? by robertli (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @06:09PM
  • Re:China! by roju (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @11:56AM
  • But she misses their goal! by Fringe (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @12:24PM
  • Re:Well... BASIC English by catfood (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @12:32PM
  • Re:English is the language of business by Conor (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:50AM
  • Re:Huh? by PurpleBob (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @01:19PM
  • American/British language differences...hehe by marcus (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @02:53PM
  • One problem: typing by festers (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:57AM
  • Re:a point to ponder by brucet (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:25PM
  • Re:"Official" language doesn't tell whole story by RomulusNR (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:57AM
  • Not surprising (Score:3)

    by sheckard (91376) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:37PM (#675351) Homepage
    English is the unofficial language of the world anyway... how come students all around the globe learn English at a young age (when one is the most adept at learning a language), while many US students are lucky to get 2 or 3 years of a foreign language in high school (which, speaking from experience, is not enough to do anything useful).

    English is also the official language of air traffic control, so basically if you live in a non-English speaking country and want to be a commercial pilot, you must learn English. Of course, many pilots only learn enough useful English to communicate with ATC and nothing else, but that does say something.
  • Re:OCR of Asian languages is easy by Rocky (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @04:03AM
  • Re:Internet language I=S English by DiviN (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @10:56PM
  • Re:what is english? by Omnifarious (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @03:50PM
  • Non aux seinsiboires de blokes! by bbcat (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:39PM
  • Re:"English" outdated by AntiBasic (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @04:19PM
  • [Way OT] USA *needs* an official language by Yekrats (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @04:06AM
  • Re:China! (Score:3)

    by Kaiwen (123401) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @10:59PM (#675358) Journal
    Taiwan (and Japan), both of which use Chinese characters, have near 100% literacy.

    Hmm, more or less true (not true, strictly speaking; especially amongst the older generation, there are large literacy gaps). But not perhaps for the reasons you're thinking.

    As a native speaker of both Chinese and English, and a product of both educational systems (I spent most of my teen years in the US, before my family relocated back to Taiwan, and had to play catch-up with my Taiwanese classmates as a result), I'd say the Taiwanese educational system places a much greater emphasis on written literacy, for the simple reason that written Chinese is harder to learn. It may be true that literacy rates are equivalent at comparable grade levels, but only because the Chinese student puts much greater effort into it.

    In Taiwan, young children are taught to read and write using bopomofo (aka the Taiwan Phonetic System), a phonetic representation for Mandarin which allows children to learn to read and write while they're working on proficiency in written Chinese. That proficiency (it takes a vocabularly of between 2000 and 2500 characters just to read a newspaper), on average, seems to come somewhat later for Chinese children than for Western children; so in the meanwhile, they rely on bopomofo.

    As for being able to input Chinese more quickly than English, this depends in large part on the input method being employed. There are several common methods available; I'd say the only one that is faster is handwriting recognition.

    You are correct about the "densities" of the languages. This is not true necessarily, however, simply because of the relative character densities, but also because Chinese tend to speak in shorter sentences, using more compact language. For example, where in English I would say "I have a question," the Chinese equivalent utterance would be simply, "have question".

    Take care,

    Lee Kai Wen -- Taiwan, ROC

  • by aralin (107264) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:40PM (#675359)

    I am natively speaking Czech/Slovak and my primary and secondary language are German and Russian, but you cannot help it. If you work around computers, you simply HAVE TO learn english. There is no way how to get around it. I have few friends that tried, but either they overcome incredible difficulties or they just gave up. But however english is my third foreign language, it soon became the one that I use most.

    There is several reasons why english spread so much, but I think one is really important. You can learn just 3000 words to be able to fully express yourself in most cases. Basic english is something that really helps this language to spread. When you count into it kind of easy grammar...

    And I especially like that there are no special symbols, special characters, just all the basic latin characters and thats it. Don't even talk about ease of computer recognition ...

    But what I think will move english forward is the fact that more and more 3rd world countries use english as their official language. And these countries are now stepping forward too...

  • Re:Why the disparity? by Betcour (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @04:08AM
  • Re:Brittish English by Nexus Seven (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @11:10PM
  • Re:"English" outdated by iMMersE (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @04:19AM
  • a point to ponder by fjordboy (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:41PM
  • Re:English is just a corrupt form of Dutch by yuri benjamin (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @04:27PM
  • Re:Brittish English by iMMersE (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @04:23AM
  • english as a global language in one word: by imr (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:42PM
  • Re:China! by ColdGrits (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @11:11PM
  • Re:Why the disparity? by finkployd (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @04:27AM
  • English is the language of business by Yousef (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @11:20PM
  • when in rome (Score:5)

    by fluxrad (125130) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:42PM (#675370) Homepage
    To be perfectly honest, i think that we're only going to go so far without a global language. As sad as it is for some "other-continenters" to face, english is just slipping into that role. You can argue about how this came about, but it's probably going to continue that way untill the US is no longer the #1 power in the world.

    The issue is also this, while the US does not hold a monopoly on goold old DARPA Net, it was the first. and it comes to an argument of "when in rome..." If the internet was created by the spanish and everyone started to adopt that, i'm sure the language of the internet would be Spanish. (This is not to say that the de facto language right now IS english, but for all intents and purposes, english is the beast that rules).

    I guess it's just getting annoying that everyone keeps having an argument about why it's so bad that English is becoming the foremost global language. Personally, i'm getting sick of it. Let's just pick a fsckin' language, make sure everyone speaks it (i guess except for people in the south - i still can't figure out what language that is they're speaking), and be on our merry way. If it's english, great...a ton of us already know what one. If not....i'm not lazy, and i'm willing to learn.


    FluX
    After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network
  • Re:(begs the question) != (demands question be ask by Smallest (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @04:29AM
  • A constructed in between language by evilned (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:43PM
  • Re:In that case... by Bake (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @11:21PM
  • Torak- by Torak- (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:45PM
  • The only true language by billybob2001 (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @11:22PM
  • Re:Chinese not a candidate for World language. by Kaiwen (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @11:22PM
  • Re:a point to ponder by uradu (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @04:57PM
  • Re:a point to ponder by uradu (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:17PM
  • Re:China! by grappler (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:56PM
  • Re:Some international internet statistics by iMMersE (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @04:29AM
  • Web Advertising by sebol (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @08:58PM
  • Re:China! by ColdGrits (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @04:29AM
  • Pat Buchanan may choke on a meatball... by dmahurin (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:47PM
  • Re:Some international internet statistics by iMMersE (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @11:40PM
  • OCR of Asian languages is easy by bbk (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:47PM
  • Second languages - English or otherwise by sgm1013 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @04:49AM
  • Re:Internet language Will Not Be English. by radja (Score:2) Friday October 27 2000, @12:21AM
  • Re:"English" outdated by Nexus Seven (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @11:26PM
  • It ain't even the United States language. by Mononoke (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:48PM
  • Re:Friesish by elbisivni (Score:1) Friday October 27 2000, @03:45AM
  • Re:In that case... by afc (Score:1) Friday October 27 2000, @04:01AM
  • Re:a point to ponder by lgas (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:02AM
  • Re:China! by StrontiumDog (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @11:32PM
  • Re:a point to ponder by fjordboy (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:48PM
  • Re:German, and ASCIII by gotan (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:02AM
  • Written vs. spoken language (was: Re:China!) by dltallan (Score:1) Friday October 27 2000, @04:35AM
  • Inaccuracy on EMU by Malcohol (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @11:37PM
  • Re:China! by TeeWee (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:48PM
  • Re:You yi ge wenti.... by Dahan (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:04AM
  • Re:It ain't even the United States language. by nickco3 (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @11:59PM
  • Ido as 1st language? by mrBlond (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:04AM
  • by uradu (10768) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:49PM (#675402)
    > and it said that percentage of Americans that new more
    > than one language fluently was extrememely low

    And the percentage of Americans that could spell their native language was even lower.
  • Oversimplified at best. by ahfoo (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:12AM
  • Re:Rule, Britannia! by radja (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @12:00AM
  • missing the point by mrsbrisby (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:50PM
  • The way it works... by dnnrly (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @12:07AM
  • Background reading by danny (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:51PM
  • Bad English by heikkile (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @12:26AM
  • Re:China! by corvi42 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @12:28AM
  • Re:American English by Sri Lumpa (Score:1) Friday October 27 2000, @05:08AM
  • Re:a point to ponder by afc (Score:1) Friday October 27 2000, @07:52AM
  • Re:a point to ponder by RiffRafff (Score:1) Saturday October 28 2000, @04:15PM
  • Re:Some international internet statistics by corvi42 (Score:1) Sunday October 29 2000, @12:27AM
  • Re:Luxembourgisch? by jawtheshark (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:15AM
  • Radar for non-native speakers by Max Hyre (Score:1) Monday October 30 2000, @12:42PM
  • Re:Bull. by Dahan (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:15AM
  • Re:China! by corvi42 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @12:30AM
  • Re:Why the disparity? by osgeek (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:26AM
  • Re:a point to ponder by fjordboy (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:52PM
  • Re:China! (Score:4)

    by fluxrad (125130) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:52PM (#675420) Homepage
    US English is a little too encompasing for your purposes i would think. Are you talking southern US English? Californian english? New England English, etc? And who's to say that "US English" and "British English" are really all that different?

    In response to your post, I don't think chinese is going to become a global language for a couple of different reasons.

    1)When you say Chinese - are you speaking of Mandarin or Cantonese (i would assume Mandarin)?

    2)Before china unseats the US as THE super-power, it needs to go through the same time of issues as the old soviet union did. I honestly don't see a communist dictatorship moving into the big seat any time soon. Russia is a slightly different beast, and they were never really on par with the states....that was more of an assumption, as they sacrificed almost everything internally for things like sputnik and the nuclear arms race.

    I think one of the main reasons that people say chinese is going to become the main language of the world because it's the most spoken language in the world currently. Remember where most chinese speakers live...in China. The language is way too concentrated currently. Additionally, by that rational, Hindi has a high likelihood of becoming the global language as well. I find that idea laughable.

    Oh well, let's just pick a frickin' language and be done with it.


    FluX
    After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network
  • India by Ruprecht (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:26AM
  • Re:Some international internet statistics by corvi42 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @12:38AM
  • Re:timely! by karma kameleon (Score:1) Wednesday November 01 2000, @10:02PM
  • Sorry guys... it's so true... by bravni (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:38AM
  • Re:China! by QuMa (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @12:39AM
  • "English" outdated by Orifice (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:55PM
  • Re:Not surprising by N2UX (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:55PM
  • Really? by Pseudonymus Bosch (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @12:41AM
  • Re:Friesian by yuri benjamin (Score:1) Tuesday November 07 2000, @05:34PM
  • Re:when in rome by AntiBasic (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:56PM
  • Re:"English" outdated by fish (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @12:41AM
  • Re: begs the question!=demands question be asked by grappler (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:46AM
  • Re:China! by legoboy (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:52AM
  • Re:Well... BASIC English by TeeWee (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:57PM
  • Re:Some international internet statistics by corvi42 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @12:41AM
  • Re:Huh? by jawtheshark (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @12:43AM
  • Re:China! by shilly (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:53AM
  • not just the internet.... by jobber-d (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:57PM
  • Machine translation by libertas (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @02:59PM
  • SQL by corvi42 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @12:46AM
  • Overseas by Pseudonymus Bosch (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @12:49AM
  • Official Religion by meadowsp (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @12:56AM
  • porting to other languages by Jim Madison (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:54AM
  • Re:Chinese not a candidate for World language. by The Famous Druid (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @05:59AM
  • Re:"English" outdated by The Famous Druid (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @06:16AM
  • Money and Power by Wreck (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @06:22AM
  • Re:c++ by ibpooks (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:03PM
  • Let's settle on English and make it easier to use by osgeek (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @06:23AM
  • Re:Why the disparity? by JordanH (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @06:40AM
  • No surprise to me! by LaZZaR (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:05PM
  • Re:a point to ponder by uradu (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @06:42AM
  • Chinese and Japanese OCR by Mad Geek (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:06PM
  • Re:Chinese not a candidate for World language. by Kaiwen (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @06:44AM
  • Re:when in rome by reptilian biotech (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @06:51AM
  • Re:Chinese not a candidate for World language. by Kaiwen (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @07:05AM
  • Re:Why the disparity? by finkployd (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @07:06AM
  • Re:China! by Poligraf (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @07:13AM
  • Re:a point to ponder by RiffRafff (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:13PM
  • Re:Why the disparity? by finkployd (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @07:20AM
  • Why English IS the global language. by Capt. Beyond (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:13PM
  • Re:mandarin by Kaiwen (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @07:25AM
  • Re:OCR of Asian languages is easy by FunnyBunny (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:14PM
  • Actually, It's Done (to some extent). by Poligraf (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @07:31AM
  • Re:China! by Kaiwen (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:14PM
  • Re:when in rome by uriyan (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @07:39AM
  • Rules vs. Exceptions by twisty (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:15PM
  • Re:If you watch any sci fi... by Tralfamadorian (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @07:40AM
  • Re:Well... BASIC English by ibpooks (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:16PM
  • Re:You yi ge wenti.... by Kaiwen (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @07:45AM
  • English is official in Singapore by seaan (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @07:55AM
  • Bosch by Pseudonymus Bosch (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @07:55AM
  • Re:China! by Reality Master 101 (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:18PM
  • Re:China! by Inoshiro (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2000, @07:57AM
  • Re:China! by Kaiwen (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @07:58AM
  • Language comparison by uriyan (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @08:03AM
  • Re:A constructed in between language by dsplat (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:19PM
  • Re:China! by Kaiwen (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @08:19AM
  • Re:OCR of Asian languages is easy by Chris Mattern (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:50PM
  • Re:China! by Imran Ghory (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @08:20AM
  • Re:China! by Reality Master 101 (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:50PM
  • Re:missing the point by Ribo99 (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:25PM
  • Chinese not a candidate for World language. by The Famous Druid (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:52PM
  • Re:Well... BASIC English by afc (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2000, @09:41AM
  • Re:Well... BASIC English by jrcamp (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:27PM
  • They already did that. It's called Lojban. by BKX (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:56PM
  • Re:when in rome by Alatar (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:56PM
  • Which just begs the question... by grappler (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:00PM
  • umm by MrP- (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:04PM
  • ENGLISH (Score:3)

    by Dollyknot (216765) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:04PM (#675489) Homepage
    Well I've been through the lot on -1 and no where can I find mention of royalties :-). English is my first language and my last language. Not one post mentioned the *real* power of English, that being spoken English lends itself to accents very easily, the reason for this is, spoken English uses lips instead of throat. To understand this, observe the frequency of gestures with different languages. Using lips gives a more subtle nuancy of meaning, by virture of more control of sound, do you really want to talk as though you are spewing.
    However I do agree written English is a mess, and its spelling moreso
    Peter.
  • Some international internet statistics by NoInfo (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:31PM
  • Re:China! by GunFodder (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:32PM
  • My parents would not follow by DVega (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:34PM
  • Re:China! by stevey (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:35PM
  • Re:China! by QualityWithAKei (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:36PM
  • Re:Not surprising by GunFodder (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:36PM
  • Re:Well... BASIC English by The Famous Druid (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:07PM
  • Re:Huh? by alprazolam (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:38PM
  • Re:China! by SETY (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:12PM
  • Re:China! by grappler (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:13PM
  • Re:"English" outdated by BlackHat (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:39PM
  • Re:A constructed in between language by flieghund (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:39PM
  • Re:Why English IS the global language. by Ex-Cyber (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:16PM
  • Re:China! by ryusen (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:18PM
  • American English (Score:5)

    by craw (6958) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:20PM (#675504) Homepage
    Only a putz would think that English is not the defacto language of the internet. Now I know that some of you European prima donnas might think that English looks rather passe when compared vis-a-vis to your rather bizarre languages. You do not have carte blanche to say this.

    English is the grande dame of the internet, not some language du jour. English is not a kludge consisting of some funky words that we so irregardlessly made up. English is the Big Kahuna!

  • Re:Chinese not a candidate for World language. by ryusen (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:22PM
  • by garagekubrick (121058) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:47PM (#675506) Homepage
    You'll know that English is the language of the future. How's that? Well it's pretty bloody obvious, aliens speak perfect English too.

  • mandarin by Swede2048 (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:47PM
  • by b0z (191086) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:48PM (#675508) Homepage Journal
    We don't need any more laws. The U.S. does not have an official language for a reason.

    Originally, the U.S. was a country that was founded upon immigration. In fact, immigration is a strength of a country, but too many people here look at it as a bad thing. Anyways, the thing is, when people come here from another country, their English may or may not be very good. These people are consumers, and need to buy groceries, get housing, work, etc. So, as a result of capitalism, businesses try to cater to the needs of the people. In the U.S. today, you see a lot of places that are bilingual, and have English and Spanish. That is only because there is a market that you need to advertise to native Spanish speakers. I see it like, if you were Buddhist, and a lot of other buddhists lived in your area, you're probably not going to celebrate Christmas. So, let's say Christianity is the official religion of the U.S., it won't matter. Businesses are not going to sell christmas trees in your area, instead they will sell little Buddha statues and such. This isn't infringing on any American's rights, it's just catering to the need of a specific group of people.

    I also see this from a free speech point of view. Free speech is free speech, whether it is in English, Spanish, hax0r sp33k, or anything else. The government should never have the right to tell me what I can or can't say. There is no way to make an "official" English to use in all situations, as you will no doubt see from how different the dialects already are between the northeast, southeast, west, etc. I think that the whole "English should be our official language" dogma is often a mask for racism. I have not seen any place of business that has Spanish but not English. Sure, the people working there may not be masters of the language, but if you go to a Mexican restaurant and ask for a coke, they won't bring you sprite any more often than English as a first language waiters will.

  • links by websensei (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:22PM
  • Re:It ain't even the United States language. by askheaves (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:49PM
  • by achurch (201270) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:24PM (#675511) Homepage

    of course, you can read what I've written, and know that this is a horrible idea, but in the past 100 years, the english language(s) has metamorphed into so many different dialects that we may even put the chinese to shame. we have our share of slang and coloquialisms (sp?) too, and because the computer doesn't understand them, we are stupid for using them.

    I agree with you completely. English is an entirely too irregular language to be used for global communication. Especially this horrible spelling system. Who else remembers learning "I before E, except after C..." in their school days and wondering why it had to be so confusing?

    Well, we can du something abaut that. First off, let's meke sum sense aut uf thu vawels; no more uf this "I before E" crap, just plein Latun and short vawels. And wi can toss aut thos silli treiling E's whail wi'r at it.

    Thu cansonants also niid tuu bi cliind up. No mor "GIF or JIF?" argyuments--wun saund pur kansonant hiir. And wi kan teik keir uv TH, SH and CH bai riuzing q, x, and c.

    But qu vaulz ar stil kunfyuzing, so let's get rid uv kapitulizeixun. nau wi kAn yuz kApItUl lEtUrz for xOrt vaulz. And wi kAn also yuz kApItUlz for kansonants: N for "ng", Q for "qis" or "qat" (As apozd tu "qiN").

    fainali, wi hAv klind ap QU spElIN Uv INglIx! nau If wi kAn onli gEt rId Uv al Qoz IdiUmz...

    o, And dUz EniwUn no hau tu pronauns "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court"? ai nEvr fIgyurd Qat wUn aut.
    (Translation: Oh, and does anyone know how to pronounce "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court"? I never figured that one out.)

  • Re:Let's... by B747SP (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:49PM
  • speech recognition of an internet lang by cheezus (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:29PM
  • Why one global language? by GunFodder (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @03:49PM
  • by The Famous Druid (89404) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:30PM (#675515)
    I don't believe you, but that's because I've been to Norway.

    While the spoken form of Norwegian doesn't sound a lot like English, the similarities in the written form are uncanny, far closer than French is.

    I've never been to Frisia, (a province of the Netherlands) but I'm told that's even closer.

    English is basically a creole of various Nordic languages (Saxon, Danish, Anglian, Frisian, etc) and old French, with a little bit of the original Celtic, and a dash of just about every other language on earth thrown in.
  • (begs the question) != (demands question be asked) by websensei (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:32PM
  • Re:"English" outdated by The Famous Druid (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:33PM
  • by Why Should I (247317) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:34PM (#675518) Homepage

    English as refered to on the internet (and in the case of computers in general, is more likely than not american english. I mean I can't tell you how many times I have had to run through pages and pages of manually written html files (written in a text editor not that gui dreamweaver/flash shit) and do a find and replace for align="centre" with align="center".

    While this is a slight difference, it is significant, because there are a large number of non-American English speaking programmers out there and all these people have to learn how to program in one form of english and then go back to reading & writing in their native form of english.

    What you end up with here is alot of programmers who end up being confused about which english language mode they're in most of the time which gradually leads to a degradtion in the quality of both written forms of english over time.

    In this way, it could be argued (not that I neccessarily am) that the computers/internet/web are partially responsible for the gradual degradation of English as a whole - because it encourages inhomogeneity in the use of both forms.

    By the way most of the design methodolgies I have been taught at uni - when it comes to computer (software) systems design - deal with design systems that use graphical methods with direct dependence on english language interpretations and uses. Has anyone seen any design methodologies that aren't actually in english ?

  • by fable2112 (46114) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:35PM (#675519) Homepage

    Sure, plenty of less-developed countries have English as one of, if not the only, "official" language.

    Does that mean that all or even a majority of the native population speaks it at all, let alone as a first language? Absolutely not!

    (I wish I could find my sociolinguistics class notes *sigh*)

    I do remember that in at least one case, English was designated the "official" language to keep a war from breaking out between speakers of the two main languages actually in use in the country in question.

    The official language of Haiti is French. Do most Haitians speak standard French? No. Most Haitians speak a local creole that speakers of standard French would find difficult to comprehend.

    Of course, given that these people don't generally have Internet access, they may not be seen as relevant to the discussion. I'm just pointing out that they exist in large numbers.

    :)

  • what is english? by .Tacitus. (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @06:29PM
  • Here's a few papers about why not to use Esperanto by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:38PM
  • Re:when in rome by jsmaby (Score:2) Wednesday October 25 2000, @06:39PM
  • Re:(begs the question) != (demands question be ask by websensei (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @06:45PM
  • A view from DejaNews by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:39PM
  • Re:Well... BASIC English by cymen (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:40PM
  • Re:Not surprising by 3prong (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @06:45PM
  • Re:China! by robertli (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @06:52PM
  • Re:Well... BASIC English by yuri benjamin (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @06:53PM
  • Re:China! by spam-o-tron mk1 (Score:1) Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:46PM
  • Why the disparity? (Score:4)

    by fable2112 (46114) on Wednesday October 25 2000, @04:46PM (#675530) Homepage

    Two major reasons:

    1. Distance from concentrations of foreign language speakers. Since I live in New York, it would be fairly easy for me to drive to Quebec, but that's about it in terms of going someplace where the signs are all in another language (not counting the local alphabet-soup neighborhood). Contrast this with the much shorter distances between European countries.

    2. Americans are damned arrogant and think the world should learn English to accommodate us, but we shouldn't need to do likewise. This is nothing new -- my mother was an exchange student in Belgium about 30 years ago when some of the other American students she traveled with walked into a post office and started loudly berating the man behind the counter because nobody there spoke English. Never mind that English isn't one of the two official languages of the country.

    Rude. Very rude and arrogant. And the Internet seems to be making it worse, unfortunately.
(1) | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5