Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Mozilla Theme Builder Released

Posted by CmdrTaco on Mon Aug 28, 2000 03:21 AM
from the now-that's-a-cool-idea dept.
icqqm writes: "The people from AlphaNumerica have released their Mozilla theme builder which, of course, runs in Mozilla itself. Looks MUCH easier to use than the horribly complicated instructions fot XML files on Netscape's site" Note that it doesn't work with current builds, but it ought to once the dust settles a bit. I've been using Mozilla more than Navigator these days... Still want to get Galeon working since it looks to be a lot more slimmed down.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Mozilla Theme Builder Released | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 93 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • Re:Clue by cylab (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @11:33PM
  • How do you use Mozilla? by kzinti (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @12:58AM
  • Re:where's the grammar nazi when you need him? by Shoeboy (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @12:58AM
  • Not lynx, links by ghazban (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @12:58AM
  • Re:Galeon by danme (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @02:18AM
  • There is... by Perdig (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @01:03AM
  • 20MB, true by pwhysall (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @01:09AM
  • Mozilla memory footprint (offtopic) by Lothar (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @01:10AM
  • Re:Future Of Advertising by Metrol (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @02:43AM
  • Re:Not lynx, links by Tack (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @02:51AM
  • Galeon by ptomblin (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @04:59AM
  • Re:Galeon is great - damn well doesn't work but by ptomblin (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @05:18AM
  • Why does Mozilla have themes? by GodWasAnAlien (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @05:36AM
  • Re:Future Of Advertising by IntlHarvester (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @05:41AM
  • Re:browser speed by Z4rd0Z (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @05:54AM
  • Re:browser speed by Z4rd0Z (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @06:03AM
  • Re:Galeon is great by Z4rd0Z (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @06:06AM
  • Re:Galeon by Z4rd0Z (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @06:16AM
  • Re:Galeon by fr4gg4 (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @11:44PM
  • Galeon really doesn't need Gnome by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @11:47PM
  • Re:Galeon is great - damn well doesn't work but by exekewtable (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @11:50PM
  • Re:Galeon by Ur@eus (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @11:52PM
  • Re:browser speed by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @11:54PM
  • Re:This is news... by jilles (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @01:16AM
  • Re:Galeon is great by waldeaux (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @03:05AM
  • Re:Galeon by amblin (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @03:13AM
  • Re:browser speed by Ded Bob (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @03:23AM
  • Re:Galeon is great - damn well doesn't work but by Chris Pimlott (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @03:30AM
  • Re:Galeon by John Betonschaar (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @03:34AM
  • Re:Galeon by danme (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @03:37AM
  • No problems for me (except Java) by gruntvald (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @03:41AM
  • Re:Galeon is great by jsmaby (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @06:27AM
  • I -completely- disagree by Pengo (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @03:43AM
  • Re:No problems for me (except Java) by Z4rd0Z (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @07:26AM
  • Re:Mozilla memory footprint (offtopic) by Sleepy (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @07:50AM
  • typo alert! by mebreathing (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @10:31PM
  • Re:Galeon by dorward (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @07:55AM
  • Re:Galeon by ptomblin (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @08:16AM
  • Themable theme builder? by Fourier (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @08:22AM
  • Great. by nihilogos (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @10:34PM
  • Themes don't work anyway by sbryant (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @10:41PM
  • Re:Galeon by Enahs (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @08:41AM
  • browser speed by Z4rd0Z (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @10:36PM
  • This is news... by Mista Brown (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @10:42PM
  • Re:Why does Mozilla have themes? by Enahs (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @08:45AM
  • Re:Galeon by John Betonschaar (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @09:35AM
  • Re:Great. by Per Wigren (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @10:38PM
  • Galeon is great by jancastermans (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @10:43PM
  • Galeon by linux_penguin (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @10:44PM
  • The app by 348 (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @10:44PM
  • Future Of Advertising by naden (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @10:45PM
  • Re:Galeon is great - damn well doesn't work but by jancastermans (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @12:00AM
  • Re:browser speed by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @12:11AM
  • Re:This could be nice but... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @01:39AM
  • Re:Themes don't work anyway by Metrol (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @01:41AM
  • more importantly... by macpeep (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @01:46AM
  • by Metrol (147060) on Monday August 28 2000, @01:56AM (#823780) Homepage
    A little factoid for those not following the Mozilla project quite THAT closely. The milestone releases stink. They always have, and probably will continue to do so right up until when they release Moz 1.0 some time 3rd quarter of 2005.

    If you're looking for a reasonable snapshot of where Mozilla is at, pop on over to Mozillazine and use the links at the top of their page for the latest nightly download that's functional. Unless you're a third party developer, such as Alphanumerica, the milestones are best forgotten. Pull down a nightly and see what ya think. Love it or hate it, it's generally a much better picture of where this project is actually at.
  • cool skin? Are you serious by gruntvald (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @03:49AM
  • by Greyfox (87712) on Monday August 28 2000, @03:50AM (#823782) Homepage
    Also, how long before Netscape really does fulfil its goal of becoming the ultimate x-platform OS shell.

    Kind of like Emacs?

    Funny thing is since they've ported Xemacs to gtk and are working on integrating it with bonobo and they're working on integrating Mozilla with bonobo, you're going to have two applications that think they're operating systems that can communicate with each other via CORBA. Why don't they just add E-Lisp bindings to Mozilla now and be done with it?

  • Re:I -completely- disagree by macpeep (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @03:51AM
  • Re:Mozilla memory footprint (offtopic) by Metrol (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @02:04AM
  • Re:Galeon by redtux (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @04:03AM
  • Re:Galeon is great by yomahz (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @04:14AM
  • Re:Galeon is great by yomahz (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @04:16AM
  • Re:Galeon is great - damn well doesn't work but by redtux (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @04:17AM
  • Re:Galeon is great by redtux (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @04:19AM
  • Re:Galeon really doesn't need Gnome by nd (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @04:24AM
  • Re:Galeon is great - damn well doesn't work but by Chris Pimlott (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @09:49AM
  • Re:Galeon is great - damn well doesn't work but by ptomblin (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @10:34AM
  • Galleon by baelmix (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @12:42PM
  • Re:This could be nice but... by MODERATE THIS UP! (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @10:46PM
  • Re:Galeon by linux_penguin (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @03:37PM
  • Re:Galeon is great by bartok (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @04:00PM
  • Theme, schmeme. Where's the "Open" button? by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @10:46PM
  • Re:This could be nice but... by cansecofan22 (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @10:48PM
  • Whining about software bloat... by zhobson (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @06:46PM
  • Re:browser speed by Ur@eus (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @10:48PM
  • Re:This could be nice but... by zhobson (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @06:50PM
  • by jelwell (2152) on Sunday August 27 2000, @10:58PM (#823802)
    First off, some comments are suggesting that "Mozilla" should be focused on X rather than a theme builder. This is just mis-informed. The theme builder was created by a third party, and is not part of the Mozilla tree. Alphanumerica (now owned by Collab.net) created this theme builder as a demonstration of how the Mozilla platform can be used to create applications. In this case an application that helps configure the look and feel of Mozilla itself.

    There are many other applications that are being developed using the Mozilla platform. A few of note are: a Jabber client, a News Reader like interface for web forums (such as Slashdot), and various games (mostly 2d recreations of classics).

    Just keep in mind that these *third* party applications being developed using the Mozilla platform does not slow down, or detract from the development of Mozilla. In fact, they can actually help: these new, outside, developers are actually testing and submitting bugs on the Mozilla platform (Html Rendering Engine, Networking code, etc.) while creating their applications -- which in turns helps Mozilla developers increase the stability of Mozilla itself.

    Joseph Elwell.
  • Re:browser speed by nihilogos (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @11:01PM
  • where's the grammar nazi when you need him? by Shoeboy (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @12:43AM
  • Re:Galeon is great - damn well doesn't work but by jjeff (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @12:55AM
  • Re:Galeon is great by nd (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @04:27AM
  • Re:Galeon by nd (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @04:29AM
  • by crumley (12964) on Monday August 28 2000, @04:32AM (#823808) Homepage Journal
    Because when I have text selected from an xterm where I'm reading news or mail or whatever on a different system, I can just left-click the open button then middle-click the URL into the window and left-click "Open" without having to use the keyboard at all. Three clicks - no waiting.

    But it can be even easier than this! Just select the URL in your xterm, and click with the middle mouse button almost anywhere. (The only places you can't click are places where the middle mouse button already has a different meaning - i.e. text boxes, scroll bars, etc.)

    This is much quicker and easier than waiting for a dialog box to pop up, and having to click right in it.

  • Hello, Galeon World by Tough Love (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @04:32AM
  • Re:Clue by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @04:35AM
  • hmm.. sorry :) by Pengo (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @04:40AM
  • Re:This is news... by icqqm (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @04:44AM
  • Re:Mozilla memory footprint (offtopic) by icqqm (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @04:46AM
  • Re:'Then'? no, 'Than' by gravox (Score:1) Tuesday August 29 2000, @02:02AM
  • Re:Theme, schmeme. Where's the "Open" button? by crumley (Score:1) Tuesday August 29 2000, @04:47AM
  • Re:Clue (Score:3)

    by cylab (217151) on Sunday August 27 2000, @11:23PM (#823816)

    no no, mozilla is not dead...
    it comes slowly, but powerfull. what you hear now is the sound of a stampede, just hiding behind the hill.

    there are numerous reasons for that:

    • mozilla runs on nearly all platforms
    • mozilla is much more stable in m17, so there is MUCH progress at this issue
    • mozilla is much faster in m17, so this point will be improved, too
    • the mozilla-exe can be run without installation
    • mozilla can implement coporate design
    • mozilla makes the newest technologie (like xml and componental-structure) usable on every platform

    i had a discussion with a friend about a project, where large amounts of preformatted text must be categorized and made searchable for cdrom publishing. the view application and the displayed text shall have the corporate design of the publishing company.

    it all comes down, that we need to categorize the text with xml-tags and make some stylesheets for diplay of the categories and their content in the different search-masks. than we need to find a offline xml-viewer, that runs on all desired platforms and some kind of script language to implement the functionality. nice would be a sdk for changing the viewers look n feel, to match the corporate design... and it should be really cheap..

    hmmm... think for your self... mozilla is not only cool, because its ..eh.. cool; its cool, because it implements features, that are really needed by companies... at least needed in the near future (..ok, this is good for mozilla ;) )

    cylab
(1) | 2