Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment AI is a huge problem for programmers (Score 4, Insightful) 34

There's basically two options. Either it works or it doesn't.

If it works it's basically going to be doing grunt work. It's all well and good to say it freeze you up for the hard work but that means you now have a 24/7 job doing the hard work. You no longer get an hour or two of downtime resting your brain everyday. You are expected as an employee to be on 24/7 producing high quality novel code.

And if it doesn't work then yeah you are an AI babysitter. But you're still going to be treated as if the code tool works so your productivity is expected to go up.

There is absolutely no winning this.

Comment People have noticed that cycle (Score 1) 142

The right wing takes over and they crash the economy.

The left wing takes over after the right wing collapses everything and starts to fix things.

They can't fix things fast enough so the voters get angry and vote for the right wingers again. This is compounded by the right wing doing everything they can to sabotage the left wing.

Voters get upset that everything wasn't fixed so they put the right wing back in charge and the right wing collapse everything again.

Voters then put the left wing back in charge but they can't fix everything from the last cycle so things keep getting worse every cycle.

People on political forums I follow have finally noticed that cycle. I noticed it about 10 years ago. Around the end of Obama's second term is when I figured it out.

Don't know how to break the cycle though.

Comment X86 chips still run rings around arm processors (Score 1) 63

At least when the workloads haven't been heavily optimized for those processors. Those amazing benchmark figures you're seeing from Apple or for applications that have been hand-optimized and that Apple included specific silicon to optimize for. Apple has the advantage that they know a lot of their users are going to use Adobe products almost entirely so they built hardware around that and Adobe coded to it.

There is nothing wrong with that. There are obvious advantages to buying purpose-built hardware. And it's kind of neat that we have computers for that for the first time in a long time.

But if you want or need a general purpose computer you still want a Intel or AMD based piece of hardware. Compatibility isn't necessarily the issue performance is.

The main advantage to an arm processor is the incredible battery life you can get out of them. Intel and AMD cannot even come close. If you mix one of those fancy 1 MHz screens with it you can get a true all day work experience out of it. Basically not having to think about plugging into a wall socket at all.

Comment Re:Seems to me maybe government isn't the answer t (Score 1) 87

It's not the people's liquor it's the liquor of the guy that owns the contracts to make it.

You can try to make your own liquor. If you're lucky and successful the big company will eventually buy you out and you can retire. If you're not you'll either lose your shirt like the other 80% of businesses to go under or you'll get run out of business by the big company then under cuts you or freezes you out of distribution.

The world isn't fair and it's not because of "the state". You could do away with the government tomorrow and that wouldn't make the world fair.

Comment Double jeopardy (Score 1) 41

So when you move a charged into the federal courts like that you create double jeopardy. This isn't always the case however the state can basically say that they're letting the federal government take over everything and then after that the person can't be tried for a state charge.

This is why it's important to commit your crimes in a red state. It's easier enough to buy off the Texas attorney general and dirt cheap to buy off of Mississippi attorney general. Honestly you probably don't have to because the prosecutors there aren't going to bring charges because they're going to see that your buddy buddy with Trump and they're all hoping to advance their careers and they know that going after you doesn't help that.

Now if you start meddling with blue States it gets a little dicey especially if you do most of your crimes in a blue state. But there are only so many hours in the day for a attorney general in a blue state to fight corruption. And they still have to deal with regular criminals.

Comment It's just regular corruption (Score 1) 87

Mississippi like all the deep South States and honestly all the deep Red States is intensely corrupt. The reason there is a single point of failure here is because it's a good old boys network and somebody's brother-in-law gets the juicy contracts for it.

It's like the old saying, socialism for the rich and dog eat dog capitalism for everybody else.

Comment Keep a close eye on your grandparents' finances (Score 1, Interesting) 41

It is absolutely open season on old people right now. The kind of people who have some savings for retirement but whose minds are starting to wander.

Trump has sold around 2 billion dollars in pardons. That is a real sentence I just wrote and it is factually correct. It is now common knowledge among criminals that if you just put $2 million dollars aside to bribe Trump you can do basically anything as long as you make sure it's a federal crime and not state. Even State crimes can be moved to federal courts so it's important to do your crimes in a red State like Texas.

You should probably keep an eye on your kids too. Young men are prone to falling for gambling scams and Trump is fighting hard to make sure that those "predictive markets" can prey on them.

Finally watch out for yourself. Not because you're going to fall for one of these scams you're much too smart for that... Okay but seriously the problem is that we're talking about tens of billions of dollars being drained from the economy by scam artists. It's going to hurt the economy noticeably and that's going to affect your job.

Basically you can't just throw out the rule of law and all the protections that go with it without consequences. You can't put a rapist, a pedophile and a convicted felon in charge of everything without consequences

Comment 60 billion out of the economy (Score 3, Insightful) 33

Most of that money gone from angry young men who couldn't really afford to lose it. There is a damn good reason we heavily regulate gambling. It's known to be addictive. But sure let's have millions of young men with poor job prospects and in debt up to their ears from gambling. I'm sure that won't cause any problems for the rest of us.

Comment Those aren't the same thing (Score 1, Insightful) 33

Like I told the other guy, not the same thing. A loot box is not a known commodity. When I'm doing futures trading I am trading and known commodities and the only question is how much they will be worth in the future.

If I buy a loot box then that is literally random chance or it's supposed to be.

I'm assuming that you've picked up a bunch of nonsense propaganda from the gambling houses. It's also possible that they are so pervasive that they are starting to show up here. Either the way this is nonsense. We know what gambling is. It is putting up money with the goal of a specific outcome with the understanding that you have an agreement that if that outcome happens you will be paid back more than you put up.

Sometimes that outcome is completely random and sometimes it is predicated on a series of other outcomes but at the end of the day you aren't making a purchase of a commodity or good that you intend to resell you are making at Best in educated guess

Comment It absolutely is not (Score 3, Interesting) 33

Just because you are making a purchase based on an expectation does not mean you're gambling. At the end of the day when you purchase a future you're still purchasing something of tangible value. You might lose money because you overestimate the value of that thing but the amount of money you can lose is limited somewhat because there is still a tangible asset backing your purchase.

What makes gambling gambling is that you are putting up money with the expectation that given a certain outcome you will get paid more money than you put up if that outcome happens and you will lose all of your money if that outcome does not happen. There's no tangible asset whatsoever you're just making a guess on an outcome.

There is a reason why we have different words to describe gambling and futures trading instead of just using the same words. They are different things.

Of course after decades of right wing lunatics being put on the courts so that they will sign off on whatever the Epstein class wants the rule of law no longer applies.

There will be consequences for you personally. Even if you don't Gamble the tens of billions of dollars lost will drag down the overall economy and help take you with it.

There is a concept called at chesterton's fence. The idea is don't take offense down unless you know why it was put up. You are in the process of taking down a fence without realizing why it was put up

Comment The way the writers get around that (Score -1) 126

Is you have a bunch of alien races that aren't peaceful and create conflict but the core federation and the core of humanity has moved beyond conflict. Even for the handful of things where you have a federation special forces they don't exist to act against or on members of the federation they exist to deal with the less advanced alien races and still engage in conflict.

And that's the core thing. Engaging in conflict is a sign that your race is less advanced. It's why the Q are always fucking with the federation but not so much with the Klingons. They're more interested in advanced races that are close to taking the next step towards what they are.

It's a core part of the theme of the show. If you start mixing in right wing politics it's not a shortcut to introduce conflict, you already have an easy way to do that, it's just the people at the top forcing it on the writers or firing any writer that doesn't tow the line.

When you do that you eliminate everything that makes Star Trek Star Trek and frankly everything that makes anything interesting. Right wing media is never interesting or fun or cool. It's something you use to deal with being afraid of the world and the things in it. It's A coping mechanism and its propaganda for billionaires. That's never fun.

Comment It's also the exact opposite of what happened (Score 2, Informative) 126

The last Star Trek had all sorts of weird right of Center bullshit mixed into it the turn people off. Star Trek doesn't work like that. That's not what anyone comes to Star Trek for.

Nobody wants to see 2000s style anti-terrorism propaganda in their sci-fi. If you're watching Syfy it's because you want to see a world past all that bullshit. I can watch it dystopia for a movie maybe get through a book like that but I'm not sitting through multiple seasons of dystopia. And worse I'm not going to pretend that a right-wing future is anything but dystopia. Everyone knows the future of the right wing is bad news it's just at most if you're on the right wing you think it's better than the alternatives.

That's kind of the thing about the right wing. They don't think good things can ever happen to everybody. They firmly believe some people have to suffer horribly as long as it's not them. That's why right wing science fiction never works in the long run. Sci-fi is about the future and making it better. And the right wing doesn't believe that better things can happen. Whatever they have in their life right now is as good as it gets. It's a really depressing world view

Comment Right-wing nut jobs are taking over Paramount (Score 5, Insightful) 126

Star Trek can't survive. Star Trek is a fundamentally progressive and left-wing franchise. It doesn't work if you start injecting culture War bullshit. And under the new ownership anything that's not culture War bullshit is out.

I haven't seen the very newest stuff but from what I understand they started to try and get away from the good old woke Star Trek plots a little and it went over about as well as you would expect. The ratings were pretty much shit and nobody's going to spend the money to make a science fiction show like that.

Honestly that's the problem. Sci-Fi is woke. You are looking towards the future and you're doing it for a mass market so nobody is going to want to sit through episode after episode of right-wing dystopia. And I don't think anyone believes in right wing Utopias because you always have to have an out group in any right-wing fiction and it's kind of hard to have a Utopia when you are explicitly excluding minorities of one kind or another.

Honestly as the Epstein class takes over media more and more it's just going to keep getting worse and worse. Go look up what Ben Shapiro's Media company is going to do and at this rate in 10 years that's what's going to be TV and streaming.

I do wonder what they're going to do when the ratings collapse but I don't think they really care about money anymore it's just about having control. Back in the '70s gay people took over TV not because the people writing were gay or woke or liberal or whatever but because TV had gotten so censored by the right wing that it was intensely boring. So ratings collapsed. They started putting gay people into sitcoms and other TV shows because it was controversial at the time and it got viewers back.

You kind of need progressive ideas to make media interesting because otherwise you're basically just looking back to a fake idealized past ala I'll leave it to Beaver.

Again though when the ratings collapse in the past they would have done something about that to bring viewers back but these days I think they might just let TV suck. Like how Twitter is losing money hand over fist because it's full of Nazis but muskrat doesn't care because it's more useful as a propaganda tool then as a profitable business.

Comment Anyone on the right wing want to defend this? (Score 5, Interesting) 142

Something I've noticed is lately outside of safe spaces the right wing keeps their damned mouths shut. Every so often one of them will jump in and yell TDS or something but they never actually tried to defend the actions of anyone on their side or any of their policies anymore. Mostly they either avoid conversations outside of safe spaces entirely or they lurk and mod everything they don't like down.

I think the right wing knows this is going to bite them in the ass personally. I mean the rank and file the members of the Epstein class who are actually arranging all this are benefiting from it greatly. But I don't think they can stop because they've given up too many friends and family.

But come on right wingers. By all means defend this. Tell me why it's okay for the administration to go after somebody for some Reddit posts. Explain to me why you think it'll never happen to you.

Slashdot Top Deals

Q: How many IBM CPU's does it take to execute a job? A: Four; three to hold it down, and one to rip its head off.

Working...