Comment As designed (Score 1) 182
Function did its job, exactly as designed.
Whether it's legal to use or not is dependent on jurisdiction and circumstances (and still hasn't been established!), but the function existing and allowing a user to use it is no bad thing.
Think a mugger demanding you access your bank accounts. Oh, no, look, the phone's stopped working...
Comment So much horseshit (Score 1) 87
a.k.a. throwing money at rubbish ideas, and seeing what sticks.
The greatest business strategy of all time
Comment BKL (Score 1) 30
It's like a miniature version of the "big kernel lock" thing that took years to resolve.
Sure there were some blocking issues causing performance setbacks for it in certain locations but it was orders of magnitude more difficult to slice it out and replace things with smaller locks, and it still didn't have MASSIVE increases in performance or any user-visible way at all.
It's just code maintenance.
Comment Bigger problem (Score 1) 91
Who the fuck leases a PHONE.
I think that's the question we should be asking. Just buy the thing. If you can't afford to buy the thing, then get a loan/card to buy the thing.
And a phone just shouldn't be that expensive or difficult to maintain or break so often that you can't do either.
Comment Sigh. (Score 1) 52
You can keep your vanity plate names and waste all the money you want on them.
Nobody cares any more. They just google or bookmark you.
Comment Re:Do .www next (Score 1) 52
Yeah, I mean, who would call a website slash dot, because it then becomes w w w dot slash dot dot org....
Comment Re:Well Duh! (Score 1) 103
My biggest beef with the whole self-driving thing is that we should NOT have started with cars.
Why not a self-driving cart that takes you around the store? Or a self-driving golf buggy? Or a self-driving airport passenger carrier to get you to your gate? Or even those little "trains" that some shopping centres have for the kids which are just wheeled vehicles?
THAT'S where we should have begun. A limited controlled environment, low-speeds, little impact, useful, even a pay-for service (do you want to walk to your gate, or get on a little cart that'll drive you there for $1?), and iron out all the myriad problems with driving in close proximity to pedestrians, etc. in a safe and controlled environment.
The fact that those things AREN'T mature technologies tells me that self-driving car people have NO INTEREST in our safety. None whatsoever. If they did, they would have started small and built up.
Hell, even a self-driving bus makes far more sense, even if it goes slower. They often already have their own dedicated lanes!
What they did is exactly what you describe in your last sentence. Think about the quickest way to profitability and screw the testing, research, consequences, even the laws in some cases.
Comment ITaaS (Score 4, Insightful) 215
ITaaS
Insider Trading as a Service.
If lots of people don't go to jail for this at some point, America is dead.
Comment Electricity (Score 4, Informative) 226
I don't live in the US but I recently moved to a rural area and in doing so I have started to plan out a utility-independent future.
Why? Well, various reasons, including water and sewage companies taking the piss (or actually... not... just dumping the piss in every river in the country and crying that they can't process it because they gave all my money to their shareholders, but... anyway) but also because electricity is literally a con too.
And nowadays? I *can* viably make my own electricity. So... why wouldn't I? Why would I pay a company to do a bad job when I can do it myself?
I did a number of things when I moved to that area, including demanding smart meters on everything, and I monitored my electricity down to 30 minute intervals for 2 years. And you know what it showed? That 1% of the time, I have no power. That's in dribs and drabs, a power cut here or there, a scheduled one lasting a day or there, and so on. But 1% of the time they can't even get electricity to me and... there's nothing I can do about that.
So, if I want a computer to stay on... I already need to spend money and do it myself because they simply can't do it. 1% may not sound a lot, but that's 3.65 days a year if you think about it. Spread out randomly - an hour here, an hour there. Literally my computer "uptime" was "two nines" and that was driven entirely by grid power supply.
That's ATROCIOUS in my opinion, in the 21st century. And I wasn't prepared to tolerate it. I was already buying the house with the intention of becoming utility-independent but that really drove home why I need to. So I started to build my own solar, for several reasons.
1) To ride out the outages
2) To reduce my bills so they got as little money from me as possible
3) To not be reliant on the grid
4) To ultimately remove the need for grid entirely
And it's really not been hard. I started with cheap junk just to see if it would even work in my climate, with that house orientation, etc. It did. I started with a small 12v panel and an old car battery. And it was actually worth doing when I ran the numbers. It would take a few years to pay off the cost of the panel, but it would do so.
And then every month for 2 years, I would get more panels, more and better batteries, more efficient and powerful equipment in between. And it got to the point where it is technically capable of running my whole house for much of the year. And that's before I ever got onto SERIOUS panels and professional installs. That's just me, a bunch of cheap 12V panels, some 12V LiFePO4 batteries and a serious enough charger/inverter, then later going onto 24V by re-arranging them.
And I'm looking at that and thinking: Why the fuck hasn't government / the utilities done this for me? Why am *I* having to do it? Because it really is that simple and they have access to far more land, far better kit. But, no, I'm still paying inflated grid prices from when Ukraine was first invaded because of the price of GAS. What the fuck are we doing?
So now, more than ever, I plan to be utility-independent by retirement, which is 20 years away, and whereas before I was wondering if that was even viable in that timeframe, I'm now expecting that to be 100% done way ahead of schedule, just by a factor of "whenever I can be bothered". It was that easy, and doing the maths was that easy.
I might retain a grid connection, or not. It depends on what happens and what kind of low-usage tarrifs I can get in the future but I'm looking at the whole thing thinking "Fuck you, I'll do it myself" because even as an amateur... it's perfectly viable to do so. I don't care if it even costs me more (it won't). I don't care about having a grid connection or not. It's just that I will be able to be *independent* of it. When they play games, raise prices, or have power cuts, I won't be reliant on it at all. I'll use it when it's to my benefit, and not other times.
But all I ever think about the whole thing is: How have I, an amateur, cobbling cheap Chinese shit together, come up with a more reliable and cheaper power supply, that's utterly independent of fuel prices, than an entire national electricity grid could do?
The answer, of course, is corruption and profiteering. That's the only part that I've eliminated. And that's the part that, when it's gone, makes it all viable and even cheaper.
And that's the thing that's going to see me having zero electricity bills when I retire. Just by removing the profit and corruption.
Comment Sigh. (Score 5, Insightful) 147
I'll say it again:
Active military personnel carrying around standard mobile phones is such a breach of all kinds of basic security protocols that it should be illegal.
But can't let the troops get bored, eh? Have to let them do their fitbit on board your cruiser that you're trying to keep secret, and have them checking into Facebook while they're in Helmand province, and giving away their movements when they're running around your bases at home, and having an always-on device capable of tracking and recording everything from audio to the radiowaves to location, made by the Chinese, wherever they go.
Dumbest fucking idea ever.
Comment Sigh. (Score 1) 106
"OpenAI's success in hardware will hinge on bringing a novel approach to the market"
It says as it releases an Alexa....
Comment We moved not stopped posting (Score 1) 107
My communities have moved to discord. It does good chronological discussions, with support for threads.
The social media platforms I used to use all went through enshitification.
Twitter's X-ification mean its a place for journalists, corporations, and porn.
Facebook started inserting so many ads and pushing short video content, while sometimes hiding peoples posts for days, that it made it mostly useless.
Comment US (Score 1) 251
Seems like a problem you could fix overnight with guaranteed national minimum wage, worker's employment rights, and opening up immigration to regain the trust of those people you shot, killed, kidnapped and ripped their children away from.
Who the fuck would CHOOSE to go work in the US at the moment?
Comment AI (Score 2) 187
Worried about the news cycle moving on from AI, are we guys? Realising that's achievements are vastly outweighed by its costs still, and desperate for a use-case, much like IBM were in the Watson days when they literally had to ask people to suggest things it could do for them because they're run out of things that it could actually do?
Yeah, keep trying. Keep pretending that it's conscious or real intelligence or "looks like a human brain". Because someone's gotta pay those trillions back and you don't want it to be you, right?