Comment Re: A few comments on the problems (Score 1) 122
Comment Re: mostly mash-ups of existing techniques (Score 1) 122
Comment Re: Not a real physicist then. (Score 1) 157
Comment Re:It is difficult to make predictions (Score 1) 157
Pfft. Morons. It is *super easy* to make predictions.
Accurate ones, however...
Comment Re:Safer? (Score 1) 71
Sorry that HEIC is now ubiquitous.
Ubiquitous: existing or being everywhere at the same time; constantly encountered.
Windows: holds 76.36% of the worldwide desktop operating system market
HEIC on Windows: Microsoft Store HEVC Video Extension costs $0.99
Yeah, no. Yes, it's present on Apple devices. And admittedly there are about as many iPhones as Windows computers. But that's still half, and it's not the important half where actual work is generally done. It's the half where annoying people take pictures and send them to people that need to jump through hoops to do anything with them.
Comment Re:Summary ... (Score 1) 279
As I told you clearly, not changing the clock kills MORE people.
So fuck yourself.
Comment Re:Summary ... (Score 1) 279
If you had any critical thinking skills, you'd realize that my original point applies not only to keeling over, but also to feeling unwell.
More feeble people would suffer throughout the year with either permanent DST or standard time than the current one bad night in March. (Which, BTW, could be totally avoided by planning ahead and adjusting your bedtime a few minutes per day in the preceding week.)
Biology matches DST adjustments more than a fixed clock. Most everyone woke up with the sun from the dawn of humanity until the late 19th century, and adjusting the clock for the seasons stays closer to that.
Comment Re:Summary ... (Score 1) 279
Then I suggest you never travel east or west by more than a few miles. You seem feeble.
Comment Re:If you think that's bad.... (Score 1) 279
Yeah, I can't believe the level of bellyaching going on over such a small, but very effective, adjustment only twice a year.
Yeah, it's almost as bad as the level of bellyaching from those who insist we just have to do the stupidity.
Comment Re:Summary ... (Score 3, Insightful) 279
Permanent ST is more closely aligned with circadian biology, although earlier dusk may limit some evening activities
You know what's aligned even more with circadian biology?
Keep the current system, get up off your ass, and change your clocks twice per year without whinging like a precious snowflake.
That way you you don't have to deal either with the sun beating down on you while you try to sleep at 4am or with your poor children getting run over in the dark on their way to school.
Sure, a couple of codgers might keel over in march, but they were probably gonna die soon anyway. It's much harder to measure the statistics of all the other people who would die steadily throughout the year due to the aforementioned issues, as well as similar problems caused by a static clock that doesn't adjust at all to when the sun actually rises. However, I would bet good money that it would add up to far more casualties overall.
For some reason, I seem to be in a small minority on this issue, though. It's probably because everybody would rather believe in a solution to the problems of living on a tilted axis that's clear, simple, and wrong.
Comment Re: IANAL, but... (Score 1) 90
Right⦠because EVERYBODY fully reads and understands the TOCs of every service they useâ¦
People don't read a lot of things that they agree to, especially if it's 20,000 words in a postage stamp-sized text box on the new toy they just turned on. However, anybody who's not an idiot realizes that most everything in an agreement that they haven't read is against their interests, and plans accordingly. I personally always look for binding arbitration agreements and make sure to opt out of those whenever possible.
Oddly enough, the Anthropic TOS and privacy policy actually aren't all that obtuse and can be skimmed in a few minutes. They make it clear that they'll be looking for problems with what you upload and what kinds of problems those might be. Like I said, you can easily avoid all that by using a paper notebook for your diary.
Comment Re: Such a shame: Apple did it roght (Score 1) 74
Doing it right is asking whether you want it installed, not forcing it on you.
Yes, because users understand those kinds of choices.
Were you in a frat at Cornell or what?
Too soon!
Comment Re:Here we go again (Score 1) 46
What sort of argument is that? How could you possibly compare the holding up a mobile phone and using the camera in a restroom, with wearing unobtrusive glasses with a hidden camera?
There's a term for that misdirection you've attempted, is it straw man?
You're correct and I lack the mod points to surface your insight.
These are effectively concealed or hidden cameras, which is not the same thing, and that's why the described panic is fictional.
That said, I do think this is interesting overall because it's a question of how human society changes based on technology. We have rudimentary technology that taps the optic nerve in experimental stages to help with some types of blindness. Sooner or later that sort of thing will probably become routine and non-invasive. Maybe it's 50 years out, but odds are good - I think - that eventually people will be able to record everything they see and hear. It's just perfect memory plus the ability to share that memory. Well... I wonder how societies will adapt to that. Will people just wear disguises all the time? Will no-tell hotels become the norm? Will we all be so inundated with fake materials that embarrassing real materials won't shame us? Getting there will no doubt be painful, but I do find it interesting to ponder.
Comment Re:IANAL, but... (Score 1, Insightful) 90
There is a clause in the statute: "in any manner in which it may be viewed by another person". I would argue that it's her diary and not meant to be viewed by anyone. I don't disagree that turning her in was the right thing to do but I doubt she'll be convicted.
If you look at Anthropic's terms of service and privacy policy, it clearly states that they can look at your content in order to enforce their usage policy. You have to agree to this when you set up an account or use their service. Given that this is an AI company, you can bet your content will be screened for violations more efficiently than if humans were involved at every step.
If she really didn't mean for anyone else to view it, she would have scribbled it down in a notebook instead of uploading into a cloud owned and policed by strangers and their robots.