Comment Re: More IBM vaporware (Score 1) 17
NT existed when IBM brought out at least two major versions of OS/2 without such features while NT had them, so... No.
NT existed when IBM brought out at least two major versions of OS/2 without such features while NT had them, so... No.
Even if it is in the largest font size, is the average person even going to understand what the ramifications are?
No, but it would let people who care know, and it would let people who potentially care google and find out.
My question is, why only 10 hours a month!?!? I'm sure that's the only reason it's free, but that should also alleviate some of the bandwidth usage concerns.
I would tend to assume that if you pay you get more, so it's just a trial version, and this is just an indirect slashvertisement.
There really needs to be an international age verification working group that spends the next five years coming up with a system, then pressures everyone to implement it.
I don't think creating a centralized world ID database is going to be a win at this point.
OS/2 had no security features needed for multiuser support. It might as well have been classic MacOS. Citrix had a multiuser version of OS/2 with security tacked on, but it wasn't a realistic solution and was never popular. Building an OS without security was the moronic decision that killed it. Plus IBM never did anything meaningful to promote it so nobody cared. That it was used anywhere (especially in ATMs) was a horrible decision itself because of the lack of security features and has created untold woes. Maybe nobody ever got fired because they bought IBM, but they should have.
It is neither right or wrong
It's wrong. The processor has a feature. People will reasonably assume they can use that feature. Then they find out it's disabled.
assuming the features or lack thereof is declared upfront.
If that declaration is not in the largest font size used in the materials then it's hidden.
Yeah, that was a big goof, thanks for understanding.
Apple is capable of hiring talented people and creating a useful product. They just don't seem to be capable of being user-friendly in the ways that matter to me. TBH they were never great at it, and MUGs did the heavy lifting in the customer relations department for them for free. Anyway I'm totally capable of believing their performance claims, to a reasonable point, especially when the results aren't putting them first.
I wish they were friendlier, because their hardware is reasonably impressive. I'm also just not in their target demographic apparently because I'd rather have a slightly thicker device with better cooling and battery capacity.
I thought TB was only relevant in RDR2...
Also to Doc Holliday.
It's not impossible, but the switch would be expensive. It's probably easier and just as effective just to shield them, and tie the shield to the chassis ground.
Another option would be to switch power to the radio chip, if it's in a package which makes that convenient. This might also disable bluetooth if you do it to the infotainment system, or cause a code to be set...
Antibacterial soap doesn't use antibiotics, it uses chemicals known to destroy antibiotics directly and physically. It's usually done with compounds they can't reasonably develop resistance to. This is easier than in antibiotics because they don't have to be safe to put in your body.
That is not what this story is about.
You have lost the plot.
This is about whether a hostile third party can affect a vehicle remotely because of manufacturer incompetence.
New radio older than old radio? Wow.
What I find actually surprising is not in the headline but is in the summary: Mediatek is superior.
You know some of these US cities full of anti vaxxers have lower vaccination rates than third world countries right?
No, that's not how it works. People who live in a place have collective herd immunity or not, unless they are quarantined
Trump and RFK Jr are merely the current avatars for the anti-science bullshit that's been building for decades.
When the person behind the desk with the [former] label "leader of the free world" boosts anti-vaxxers, that's not "mere" anything.
I have a very small mind and must live with it. -- E. Dijkstra