Hmm, I was under the impression that the US regulator wasn't entirely useless
Please, please, please re-read that sentence and think about it in light of what you know about the US auto market and its protectionism.
Surely if they had such a serious flaw they would have been replaced already.
I see you're new to capitalism. Can I borrow your unicorn? I want to take it on a walk through fantasy-land.
Great, let's have another world record setting BESS fire.
These are the same packs that caused the last one.
Surely it's a good plan to double down instead of recycling them into something less shit!
I think these are their iPace taxis, so they will be LG Chem batteries.
So then the same shit NCM packs that caught fire in Moss Landing?
What, exactly, is the point or purpose of including code in your program that is downloaded from a third-party website every time you execute the program?
No, npm is literally the opposite of that.
If you want to include a function or subroutine or library in your program, why wouldn't you just download it and use that?
I run Drupal and it uses composer, which does basically the same thing. But then I want some javascript libraries that you can't get through composer repos itself, you need to get them from npm. So every time there's one of these npm exploit stories I say oh shit, some more shit I need to read. Luckily I'm only pulling in literally two packages from there. But I don't need to do this, I only do it specifically for the purpose of not having my site refer to some other site for those javascript libraries. That way, someone else changing their library doesn't automatically screw up my site, or more plausibly since I am not running any javascript on the server side, start back dooring other people who visit there. So npm is exactly the kind of thing you think people should be using, except with less oversight which is why we keep hearing about loads of compromised packages.
Disagree on this. That's like saying only shows that trek through the stars should be called Star Trek - and yet the best Star Trek series ever made was Deep Space Nine.
Yeah, they had B5 to crib from.
The Stargate is just part of the premise of the followup shows, not a required defining characteristic of them
If you're putting it in the title, yes it is.
Dear friend,
We make certain rules so that we can live in the same nation together. For example, we must to a reasonable extent unify our motor vehicle requirements so that you can reasonably travel to other states without onerous additional inspections and harassment. Alas, with rights come responsibilities.
Signed,
Srsly
The link we wanted was actually in that story, which is worthless by comparison
You can see this on every popular forum and social network. And as far as I can tell, the only people they ever try to verify actually exist are the real ones
As in: Suck Bezos's Big Fat one,
Come now, Bezos is the one with the trophy wife
Yeah, but he has to close his eyes, who can successfully nut while being sucked off by The Joker?
They are sitting on it and not using it. They would be happy to take in licensing money instead.
Not necessarily true. They might think they can make more with it in the future, or they might just want to stop a competitor from having a success when they do not at all need the money. You are thinking like a poor.
I'd say the original series is the weakest of all of them... but this is understandable, because they were finding the formula. They didn't really hit their stride until a couple seasons in there either, but there was a lot more to like sooner than SGU. The state of the art was lesser at the time as well, so that made it more appealing, because the production values were really very high. It might not seem like it if you compare S1 of SG1 to S1 of SGA, but you just have to remember that time passed there.
If you watched it in period and were fresh off a high of watching the movie, it was a lot more appealing.
It's clearly unconstitutional (like 90% of what the Federal government does)
Ah, you're one of those people who doesn't recognize that the ICC and general welfare clauses constitute an effective blank check, because the constitution was written at a simpler, dumber time
The other 7,999,999,999 people on the planet really don't care. Fortunately you don't run their lives, and you should be happy they don't run yours.
There are exactly 8B people on the planet? That's interesting news. Factually though, most people want less pollution, and don't care what cowards think.
What does this ruling have to do with parties? A democratic administration would have sought the same end.
The best way to accelerate a Macintoy is at 9.8 meters per second per second.
