Did they not stop doing QA a while ago? Their bumbling about incompetently certainly seems to suggest so.

That is not how that works. Does somebody explain to you how banking regulation works? Well, obviously, because you are clearly completely clueless while shooting your mouth off. All too common these days.

So, banks are highly regulated. And one thing they are responsible for is protecting their users from technological and attacker-caused risks. The degree varies, but they have that responsibility basically everywhere. There is a reason that private bank customers do not get API access, for example and it is not cost. On the cost-side, banks would like if somebody else were to develop all their client-side banking software and they had no part in any of it. But here is the thing: If a bank opens up an interface to a private customer that the private customer cannot reasonably be expected to understand and that is risky to use, then the bank may well become liable for the damage done and may face additional penalties.

What else is new.

At this price, that is. May be too few to even make releasing games for it worthwhile.

Yes. The CEO-class tries to get rid of all workers that they can get rid of. That this ultimately means no consumers and society stops working is apparently too complex an idea for them.

Yep. The people taking the jobs are victims too. All so that some already rich assholes can get even richer.

As the specific evidence was regularly mentioned in the press for the last few months, I can only assume you are lying scum.

What does that have to do with anything? Are you trying to move goalposts in some dishonest move?

Probably because Epstein got him a 13 year old to rape that ended up biting him when he tried. Why are you trying to defend the convicted felon?

Probably.

I do not use Google products, far too crappy. But the last time an LLM "support" bot has failed me was last week.

Indeed. But even NuScale is a bet on mostly hot air. The thing is, the general public, and apparently most "investors" have no clue how long it takes to get complex industrial machinery from the drawing board to "works well in practice". They probably think 5 years would be long. Realistically, if we have a working, proven and economically feasible SMR design in 30 years, that would be surprisingly fast.

You are thinking of the time only engineers and tech-fans were allowed on the Internet. We should never have opened it for the general population. That is killing it now.

On the plus-side, the "engagement" score of "support" will go wayyyy up with all the people cursing this abomination into the deepest hell imaginable. Any engagement is good engagement!

Yes. Second stage: You are not allowed to insult that useless chatbot.