Your digital ghetto is self imposed.
Your digital ghetto is self imposed.
This is like taxing car owners to subsidize stage coaches.
A lot of people deride unions, but unless we have them, corporations pull this type of shit again and again. The government is either apathetic or complicit, which means the only protection for this type of shit is unions.
what color is grass when it is dead? 1 green, 2 blue, 3 yellow, 4 brown.
I HATE questions like this. All those captchas, as well as text book questions back in my school days, you have to pretend to be an idiot in order to guess the answer they want (which is often different from the "right" or "correct" answer).
What color is dead grass? Yellow seems a reasonable choice to me. I've seen lots of yellow spots in otherwise green lawns everybody calls "dead patches". Green might be the correct answer in many places where owners have resorted to painting the dead grass (or dirt) to fulfill HOA or city requirements. And all these exceptions to the simplest question you could come up with!
Google's capchas are pretty terrible, too. Click on photos containing houses? Lots of squareish (possibly commercial) buildings in there could go either way. And how many people call their condo or apartment their "house"? So those high-rises might qualify, depending on your POV. And that's before you get into homelessness and photos of bridges, dumpsters, empty cardboard boxes, etc.
My physics textbook had the worst stupid questions. Some seemed intentional tricks, but I'm not so sure in hindsight, as so many others were just idiotic and wrong. "What falls faster, a bowling ball or a feather?" The supposed correct answer is both are equal, because you're wrong to just assume we're on Earth in an atmosphere. But with "Does a car use more gas when the headlights turn on?" the accepted answer is Yes, and there's no consideration of different models with massively overpowered engines which won't even notice the different in load.
I'll wrap up my rant here.
Most of those issues CAN'T even possibly happen with a corporation, others won't because of the profit motive, etc. So you're just making a fool of yourself trying to hand-wave away those problems.
G.fast over copper = gigabit dsl
Only if you can throw a rock out your window and hit the DSLAM, are you going to get gigabit speeds over DSL. In a realistic scenario, even the best-case is less than half that... data rates of 500 Mbit/s up to 100m from the DSLAM.
(Telecommunications) a transmission technique using a wide range of frequencies that enables messages to be sent simultaneously, used in fast internet connections. See also baseband
When DSL stops using multiple frequencies, you can stop calling it broadband. And don't forget that Ethernet is baseband, no matter how fast or slow it may be.
Imagine for a second, that the municipality owned that last mile, and leased it based on the customer/subscriber and the Vendor having a contract for service.
* Network build-out goes slower, and is even more strictly limited to those politically and financially influential areas.
* Your city goes into bond debt, which doubles the cost, and raises taxes to fund what build-out they do.
* Internet prices are higher, as the government insists on getting all their money back, up-front.
* Service is worse, as your municipal government isn't nearly as financially motivated to fix or upgrade lines, and you don't even have a duopoly with competing lines to switch to.
* The guys hired to do this will be firms that specialize in filling-out paperwork properly, with no skills to speak of.
* Those in charge will be political appointees who have no technical knowledge and do everything the worst way possible.
* You can't vote with your wallet, and in the general election, a few angry internet users is too small a voice to be an election issue or affect the outcome.
* You can forget about EVER getting speed upgrades, as there's no competition or incentive in general for the municipality to ever do better.
The gas and water lines running under major cities are notoriously over a century old, only getting replaced when they fail in spectacular fashion. Service is overpriced compared to alternatives, and frequently structured so you're required to PAY the basic rate even if you aren't hooked-up to and using them. And that's with a technologically simple, low-tech utility service.
I'm not in Comcast territory, but I'm not much better off. Time Warner Cable... I mean Charter is my only high-speed wired option.
I'd give anything to have Time Warner as "my only high-speed wired option". They're the only ones offering $15/mo internet service to everyone (other providers have $10/mo service only for a few low-income families). When I moved-in here, I had the choice of $65/mo FIOS or $50/mo cable.
Now that the idiots who are supposed to be helping the public instead just let Charter buy Time Warner with no restrictions, you've got the choice of $40/mo or $60/mo internet service, and NOTHING ELSE.
Wrong. The fact that the pool turned green was everywhere, the official explanation as to why wasn't.
Why do you think Verizon et al is now trying desperately to get out of the wireline business?
Verizon is getting out of the wire line business because, while it is profitable, there is more profit in putting that money into wireless. Verizon used their public utility status to subsidize and develop their wireless network, and now that they've rung all the value out of that privileged position, they don't need it anymore (except in Boston).
It's a strange market distortion... Profitable is never profitable enough, if there's anything out there which is making money quicker, even if it's not as safe and consistent.
The only thing that grants VMware the permission to use and redistribute linux code is the GPL, if they don't agree to it, then they can't use any of it.
The link in those emails asks you to CREATE an account, so that you can setup email preferences. They had no other way to opt out. I guess Google put their foot down, because now there's an email@example.com address that gmail uses to opt you out when you flag it as spam.
LinkedIn spams the whole planet, it has nothing to do with you being a former user. Until recently there was NO WAY to opt out of the spam without CREATING an account. However, Gmail figured it out and will generate an email to firstname.lastname@example.org if you report it as spam.
1) The Soviets demanding to see papers to travel made Americans highly skeptical of government required ID.
2) All audits of US elections have shown voter fraud to be nearly non-existent.
3) There is no day of the year when nobody works. Putting it on Sunday screws people who work weekends.
4) Electronic voting can be carefully audited to confirm no extra votes were registered, no strange patterns exist, and the results can be compared to exit polls. Like #2, despite a lot of fear mongering, there's no evidence of vote fraud/tampering after several years. Some states require paper print outs so discrepancies can be investigated and recounts can be performed.
Internet voting doesn't provide greater risk of voter intimidation than mail-in absentee ballots, which have been uncontroversial for many years.
But I appreciate the example of an "ugly" European, who has no knowledge or perspective, telling others how they're doing everything wrong.
If you're not careful, you're going to catch something.