Kind of ironic to say given the incredibly faulty logic at work in these comments.

Are the people pleading actually rolls of Bounty in human skin suits? How else can they plead "Quilty?"

One problem with this hypothesis I see is ... didn't a company that makes porn movies get caught seeding their own torrents - which blew up in their face after they tried taking to court people who torrented said movies?

I can't help but imagine that would make such maneuvers, similar maneuvers, seem less likely to work - that there are cases of people trying it only to have it blow up in their faces, I mean.

How did shoplifters force a store, any store, to potentially understaff their stores (adequate staffing being, time and again shown in virtually every training videos that exists / has been leaked online to be an effective deterrent? How did the shoplifters force a store to take a method that has real potential problems?

They didn't. Only the store choose to do that.

This "SOLELY X makes Y do Z" thing is not logical.

People with physical disabilities still shop for food too, you idiot.

People who think solely one factor has one outcome while ignoring other variables being part of it - in this case those who choose to ignore that it is the store choosing potentially problematic (and dubiously legal) methods to deal with the problem and nobody else.

I may be recalling incorrectly, but I thought that was illegal in the U.K (as well as in the U.S interestingly).

Those who think, whether erroneously or correctly, that more cores = more tasks that can run concurrently without needing to fight for CPU time, and greater granularity in being able to divide up tasks that can be parallelized?

What do you mean "discover the price?" Pardon me if I'm being a little slow...

Scalpers who use bots, at the least, are far from a "fair market" component.

Jeez, Dragon, who took an upper decker in your coffee maker this morning?

IDK about salespeople - at least competent ones. These ilk asking for 12h/6d seem more like retards of the executive kind, IMO.

... but how do they come to the conclusion, what methods and tools do they do? I guess part of me is jaded by the continual debates over something being AI or not on other platforms often fueled by "AI checkers" whose accuracy range from dubious to dogshit at best.

Why should the focus be shifted away entirely from the people, you know, actually making the things shittier?

I am not following. How is that at all significant? (and 300MB for a calculator is still pretty nuts)