ut in speed limits for the large aircraft. Right now airline flights fly fast to reduce total travel time. But the wait to get onto the flight is so long, not even counting the wait to get your luggage and/or rent a car means the actual percentage gain in time is not meaningful
Depends on the airport, time of day, route, etc - for much shorter routes , for much longer flights that seems absurdly impossible though.
Why would you include waiting at the airport though in the travel time (boarding and baggage retrieval, which also assumes someone has to be checking on bags too (another potential assumption error))? I mean, if the measure is getting between two points, why not just compare the travel between two points (which can include taxiing to the runway, to the gate, at the airport)?
My number one recommendation is to not do open-coded buffer or string manipulation by using pointer arithmetic. This simple to do but almost all of C OOB issues I see are caused by this.
Maybe this is a stupid question, but is it a problem with using pointer arithmetic, a problem of not ensuring you do proper bounds checking (even having a maximum boundary for instance), and the like, or even both?
Fakes mess it up for others
Fakes are used as an excuse for others to mess it up, and do so knowing they never get criticized (despite directly causing the mess ups) because somehow we've been programmed to ignore the actual causes and think way too simplistically.
For instance, fakes didn't cause schools to overcorrect so badly as to reject valid claims, the schools did period.
Reminds me of the miracle cripples on planes
Another moral panic that IMO is based on an extremely gross oversimplification. I know people who can walk short distances, or have other conditions making mobility difficult... and people where that manifests itself as a problem at large airports, but not at really small ones - so in that case for instance it would make sense to need a wheelchair to get through the larger one and not the smaller one.
Are there people legitimately abusing this? Absolutely. The answer, however, is not to stigmatize people needing things like this conditionally - that makes the person framing it that way, IMO, the asshole.
which no one needs
Can we please with the interjection of opinion when talking about facts in this manner? YOUR OPINION is not fact, MY opinion isn't fact. You not seeing cases that may exist for something similar =/= "non e exist," nor does my seeing use cases mean there aren't bad use cases either.
The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent. -- Sagan