Comment "EdTech"? More like cheat-tech (Score 4, Insightful) 16
No one used Chegg for serious study. It is an answer platform. And how there are free AI resources that provide even better answers. So Chegg is doomed.
No one used Chegg for serious study. It is an answer platform. And how there are free AI resources that provide even better answers. So Chegg is doomed.
EMT does not mean the market is always "rational". It states, roughly, that there is no consistently risk-adjusted _profitable_ way to predict market movements. Within EMT, there are strong forms (never possible) and weak forms (possible with insider information).
But this weeks movements in the stock market in no way disproves market efficiency or the wisdom of passive/index investing. To the contrary, I haven't seen any geniuses pop up saying "I told you last week that this was going to happen, and I made a ton of money shorting NVDA".
The problem with Microsoft search isn't a lack of AI. The problem is it doesn't work. It does not effectively search your hard disk, instead trying to pull in stupid web results that are irrelevant.
Everything (voidtools.com) fixes what's broken in Windows search and is fast, lightweight, and simple. And doesn't need "AI"
They were pointless. Last thing I need after spending thousands on some hardware is a sticker to advertise that I spent thousands on the hardware.
Plus, cows are a renewable resource. They operate off ordinary grass without any additional greenhouse gasses required, and turn it into leather and delicious steaks. Truly an environmental miracle.
First off, it's not 50% of _work_. It's 50% of studios. The stupid headline make it sound like half the work is being done by AI, when clearly it's not.
And then if you RTFA, it's not 50%. It's 31% use AI tools, and 18% have a colleague who does. That doesn't make 50% of anything.
In short, it's the dumbest summary on Slashdot I've read in a long time, and that's saying something.
Judge Albright is in the Western District of Texas (Waco), which has taken much of the new patent cases that used to go to Eastern District of Texas.
While article says this court is "plaintiff-friendly", in reality this court has a specialized IP litigation docket, with processes that expedite patent cases to trial. Some plaintiffs may favor that, but it also benefits defenses to have the court know the ins and outs of IP and to have specific expertise.
As alluded to in the post, it is similar to what users have to go through with Kindle on IOS. You purchase a book, you have to go to the web version of Amazon. You can't use the Amazon app or the Kindle app.
It's an extra barrier of stupidosity due to Apple's rules. If Apple were to charge a small, reasonable fee for distribution -- say 50 cents for a purchase -- everyone could end up happy, including consumers. But instead, you have to work around because Apple insists on charging a percentage of the value of the content.
"Hashed" invested $25M. They lost $3.5B in fake money. It never existed, never had value, and so was never lost. They are just out $25M, poured down the drain.
Can we please have a end to the "$1Zillion NFT purchase using StupidCoin" stories. There's no liquidity in whatever the heck is "MANA", so there's no real value.
Here's an ICO for "IdiotCoin", 1 of 10 quadrillion. Key: #000001. I'll buy it from myself for $1. There, now I'm a multi-quadrillionaire. Now I'll use 1 IdiotCoin to purchase virtual land on a virtual server. Wow, this is making me rich!
I'm 95% certain that the top search term on Google is "Google"
There are millions who think Google equates to The Internet.
Enron was fraud, but there were many successful appeals against convictions on the grounds of collective responsibility.
I'm pretty familiar with Enron fraud
The successful appeals weren't on the grounds of collective responsibility. They were because the convictions were based on "honest services", which is a relatively vague law that means you are supposed to do the right thing. It's not fraud directly, but sort of indirectly, and it wasn't often applied to private sector employees (and that was what was appealed). Lots of people still went to jail from Enron.
How dumb do you have to be to see a difference between overpromising and intentionally inflicting flawed medical treatments because of defective medical devices that don't work at all (Holmes). And even the Neuman types actually produced a product. A stupid product, sure. But if WeWork properties collapsed on their users or they served poison coffee, you can bet Neuman would be facing criminal charges.
It's not a crime hype a stupid idea. Theraos wasn't a stupid idea. It was a fraud. And a dangerous one at that.
What's the difference between a computer salesman and a used car salesman? A used car salesman knows when he's lying.