Comment Re: Cool.. (Score 2) 8
And get substantially more attention if maintainers.
And get substantially more attention if maintainers.
I have a solution for this.
And by that I mean an idea that these idiots could use to protect media like that, and still be capable of using it themselves.
I'm more confused why you think any of those are a challenge.
Deadly toxins, explosives, etc. the information for creating and using them is basic science. If you've been at University for more than 2 years and you can't: know where to find the info, have the skills to do it; you should hand in your degree, because you skipped out of way too many classes.
Your kitchen and utility closet could wipe out a small community. Your garage could level it.
I will be offering a Degree in Moderation, get every single student in this program to be blocked by every social media platform before they complete their term.
It's not really news.
The vendor being based in Israel is being highlighted to put a negative spin on it. Nothing has really changed however.
You can use the truth to make your enemies look bad, just by highlighting the undesirable aspects that haven't changed.
Aspiring writers are told one of the most important things to do to learn writing is, get this, read. Not instructional manuals, not tutorials, while those are absolutely encouraged, what they are told to do is read the types of books they want to write.
You know, so they can preprogram their neural structures on what the concepts are around structuring the types of books they want to write.
So yes, people train on books, novels, technical manuals , fiction, non-fiction.
Some of those people have didactic memories, they remember what they read in great detail and can unintentionally regurgitate that material in their own writing. It happens.
So when people say LLMs do things people don't, they usually just haven't met enough people.
Really? Exactly not what they should double down on.
As someone who has been accused, falsely, of cheating multiple times, it's inherently disheartening. There's no way to prove you didn't cheat, you can just deny it. There's accusation is enough in more serious ventures to end careers in some instances. Without proof.
I used to work with someone who had a side job at a publishing company, he had a lot of heartbreaking stories from authors who had lost their work when computers crashed and destroyed it. One was in the middle of a legal dispute over authorship as they had a business partner who had been involved. Copious notes were lost, and the remaining notes weren't sufficient to prove who wrote what or provide a strong amount of evidence for the ratio of work.
The one who did the most work? Never wrote again. The other guy? Found another writer to leach talent off of.
Writing, software development, etc, can be a job, or it can be a passion project. Being accused of cheating with a passion project will suck the fun out of it entirely.
Lobo wasn't it.
Seriously, I don't think the presentation of Lobo was on point at all. Not intimidating, a ridiculous Characature of the concept.
Good choice on actor, someone just fails to make a scene presence, and for that I blame the production.
Targeted markets. All in one solutions work best in government contracts, for example.
It always seems to happen when groups don't agree with someone politics. Weird. It almost never happens otherwise.
Them prematurely banning him in this instance proved his point.
You'll understand if you think about it
Sure, but it'll be better when algae is not in the whitehouse.
When people start attacking the school buses, will it really be safer for the kids?
What they actual want is that attacking the license plate readers to cause significant moral outrage by shifting the risks to children.
You had mail, but the super-user read it, and deleted it!