The summary even says that the data analysis showing transition from laminar to turbulent Is a quarter century old while the data itself is approaching a century. Even someone as old as me had this thought ingrained in coursework a quarter century ago, so the idea the single source cited is unique among engineering and science researchers fails miserably. There aren't closed form solutions for simple shapes that resolve to easy to compute answers from a generic solved formula, like simple drag for example, but instead require very intensive finite element analysis, and ideally across more than just simple fluid dynamics. This is why they haven’t had practical use beyond some simple experimental results like golf balls, where the dimple patent is 121 years old, as an example predating the summary. Once you can include this property reliably into physics simulation models for engineering platforms, as is currently being done, we will see many more advances such as the now banned Olympic swimming suits.