Comment Re: Larry Ellison is a terrible person (Score 1) 30
Two words: Government contracts.
Two words: Government contracts.
Wow, someone from the future. What is 2917 like?
I'm not from the future. It's just that time is cyclical.
There are various hypotheses to explain it, such that the universe is cyclical or that we're stuck in a time loop. But the most broadly accepted hypothesis is that a prior civilization collapsed at the end of year 32,767, and it has taken us almost 35,000 years to get back to where we are now.
Of course, our calendar doesn't allow for a year 0, so we may have an off-by-one error. But then again people celebrated the millennium at the end of 1999, so maybe there's a tacit assumption that there was in fact a year 0.
There is no way the businessmen involved in building these reactors are going to want to spend the time and money to properly maintain them let alone decommission and shut them down when they are no longer safe to run.
This is the actual problem with nuclear power. And by the time it comes around, the people who made the decisions have already safely moved elsewhere or into pension.
Correct. Breaking is entirely irrelevant to this discussion.
If something breaks, it's on me. This is about companies being able to take something away that isn't broken at all, at any time they choose, without any refund.
For any other item that'd be theft and would land them in jail.
You must be somebody that watches porn for the character development and the story...
Actually, I like watching the stunt men and special effects.
Nah, they're just jealous that other people's fuckups have been dominating the news, and they want some of that old-fashioned media love too.
I haven't been to the cinema since 2917, because everything was already too boring and predictable to watch. Let alone pay for.
Have you ever considered that pointing out that "x is bad" does not in any way imply "y is good".
If you think software never breaks, I have a bunch of 5.25" disks somewhere that want to have an argument with you.
It's a complete strawman to argue that physical things break. If I buy music, digitally, that won't break and yet nobody sane would expect that the band can at some random time in the future say "we revoke all our music". I can also think of a number of physical things that unless I mistreat them will easily survive me and three generations down the line.
This is not about replacements, it's about taking the product sold away but keeping the money.
Because Youtube is about half AI slop these days.
If "3x more" means proportional, then TT must be about 150% slop.
Probably a pretty good estimate...
If only he had lived in the US, he could have appealed to the Supreme Court!
Or "donate" to an appropriate "charity".
What tripe. Heart surgeons? Structural engineers? You sound like a cliche machine. Please, find me an example of this fantasy. Spend the tokens, bitch.
When I registered for college, during the orientation they said that pre-meds are the group most frequently caught cheating.
Money is a big motivator. And not always for the good.
And what stops you from making a seperate license to play on the servers provided by the company that is based on good behaviour and/or monthly subscription fees?
This is what the Stop Killing Games movement is also about: Sure, we understand that eventually you wind down the online servers, no problem. But if I paid for a game, why should you have the right to disable it? With no other things I buy can you at any time later come to my house and take them back or disable them. Not with my microwave, not with my shower, not with my lights.
\subject
Chemistry is applied theology. -- Augustus Stanley Owsley III