You see I thought that he (Alan Mulally) would be a good selection because Microsoft needs a great business person to run their business.
I spoke about his technology background, business background, marketing savvy and market confidence. All of that remains true but my mind changed for one fundamental reason.
Microsoft is currently a pretty sound business. In fact, they’re doing pretty well and making good numbers. As Mary Jo Foley pointed out in the preamble to her interview with Steve Ballmer, Mr. Ballmer has actually been a fantastic financial steward of Microsoft’s treasures. You can look at any financial graph showing the length of his tenure and you’ll see that it’s been a slow and steady upward ride.
Maybe too slow for some investors but hey, those dudes are never satisfied. Bottom line is, a business whiz is not necessarily what Microsoft needs right now. While the next CEO will need to be somebody who has a grasp on the numbers, business acumen will by necessity have to be a secondary skill.
In any case the comparison to Soviet Russia immediately falls on its face. I own my house, I own my business, I own my car and dozens of other things. It is annoying when people try and make comparisons between things when very superficially they are similar but they aren't even remotely close in scale or severity.
He said "when I grew up.." Russia was a completely different country back then. He is referring to the cold war era.
but isn't that at least in part what is supposed to be so great about Linux and related bits?
not everything that is Linux is open source and free. Linux it self yes maybe i should add the word "hardly"
"The chain which can be yanked is not the eternal chain." -- G. Fitch