Comment About glossy screens on MacBooks (Score 3, Funny) 666
Glossy screens are not a problem as long as you are wearing a black turtleneck.
Glossy screens are not a problem as long as you are wearing a black turtleneck.
I brought my laptop to my job interview at Google and to three out of four interviewers I demoed a major application that I'd written myself, demonstrating my MySQL, Java, GUI Design skills; I also pointed out how the graph drawn included grounds-up innovation of a new graph untangling algorithm.
I got the job without having to submit to a second round of interviews.
This was Sept. 2004. Dunno if this strategy would work today. You may want to ask if you are even allowed to bring a laptop.
While I worked AT Google I conducted about 20 interviews myself. I was one of the GA experts and whenever someone wrote "GA" on their resume, I got to interview them. Everyone I interviewed clearly had done GA work, but very few actually understood what they were doing.
My final interview question was always "True creativity cannot be turned off. Tell me about two instances where you invented something, no matter how insignificant, to simplify your everyday life". Answers ranged from trivial to Rube Goldberg-like but several people drew a blank. Do people in general just accept the world the way it's given to them?
Users can still log in sans issue. However, they arrive at empty inboxes: No custom folders, no messages in "Sent" or "Deleted," nothing. As one might expect, the abruptness (and unexpectedness) of the purge has left some of Hotmail's long-time users a bit in the dark
It's much easier to teach a biologist how to program than it is to teach a programmer about emergence.
The problem with AI is that it's been done by programmers. Cognitive Science should have stayed a Life Science, the way it was before 1955.
The glossy screens on MacBooks are no problem at all as long as you are wearing a black turtleneck.
Yes, I also instantly saw the correct answer before reading the article. In fact, I even missed the sentence about not using diodes.
I knew about voltage drops.It was the single fact that the problem had been solved (patented) that made me think about it again in a different light.
It's interesting that when the first solution that comes to mind (diodes) doesn't work (voltage drop) then it blocks our problem solving process from finding other solutions.
I deal with this daily in my work; I try to come up with Holistic solutions to problems that have been traditionally (and in vain) attacked using the much more common Reductionist (model based) methods.
We're working at one level below that. How do humans learn *anything* at all. Language is a special case of that.
The lower you go, the easier the problem gets. But you need to make sure that when you are measuring your progress
you really are measuring the right thing.
> But we know that after a certain critical period it becomes functionally impossible for a human being to learn language
This is simply incorrect. I know five languages. I don't see a problem learning another one as long as I can learn *anything*.
If you want to form an opinion about my competence, perhaps you should watch a video or two of the ones I've posted on the web
or check out http://artificial-intuition.com/
- Monica
(null cookie; hope that's ok)