Also, for 99% of what you would like to do with GPIO, you can hang a $3 Arduino Nano off of a USB port.

You're not saying anything that I or someone else hasn't already said in this discussion and therefore I'm well on top of it, except that it's off by default, that part I didn't know. Perhaps I turned it on, I don't recall. And your claim that it doesn't work if you're not "aligned" with Steam, whatever that's supposed to mean. It's always worked for me.

That's good, I couldn't recall. But the IO priority is important, too. When I start intensive long-running processes where I don't care if they finish, I use nice ionice -c idle $* (I call it "nicer")

Works with ZFS. And I have autotrim on so it does it automatically when it makes sense.

I am.

But that's absolutely the question here! That's exactly what I'm talking about! The question absolutely is already "can anyone legally use Claude-produced code?" And I don't have a strong opinion because I'm not an IP lawyer, and though I have strong opinions on how it should work, they are not particularly relevant to that argument.

But I do have some thoughts, even though I am not an IP lawyer, on what the argument hinges on, and what the GPL has to say is absolutely relevant here if using Claude does not exempt one from having to follow the copyright of the source material. And so that is absolutely in turn the argument that every single LLM as a service purveyor is making, whether they have done so in so many words or not, because if that is not so then they are party to copyright crimes whose pure punishment-related fines would be in the billions or trillions of dollars plus prison terms lasting until approximately the heat death of the universe (which will no doubt be due to excessive use of AI.) They would have criminally (willfully and for profit) infringed on copyrights, in numbers of times which stretch from here to eternity.

LLMs are supposed to be legal because their creation is based on Fair Use. But there's no hard standard for what is or is not Fair Use, only a lot of examples of outcomes in court. LLMs are novel, there can be no perfect precedent for them. Truly settling this is going to require new laws.

You think that's supposed to be some kind of insult? Yawn.

That's a feature.

Plainly and obviously false. We are already moving mass amounts of people with cars, despite all their many deficiencies.

Also false, although it does make planning simpler and wait times shorter so yes, you would likely run a certain percentage of empty vehicles through the system.

PRT can be elevated, and use basically no space on the ground, so it can coexist with all existing forms of transport.

Rental car agencies require a large footprint, so they can only be sited in areas where that is possible. That typically means in the outskirts of an airport. I haven't had LAX as a final or origin since the 1980s.

It's not relevant to that, which isn't a problem anyway with an elevated PRT system, but it is relevant to efficiency. PRT solves two problems with cars, one of them being pneumatic tires, and the other being safe platooning. There is fundamentally no way for cars to ever be safe doing that at high speeds, and the tires are a huge part of that.

Tire company is in favor of using tires? Will you fucking listen to yourself?

Only the top 22 best-selling phones ever sold 100,000,000 units or more. Feel free to try again.

Shut up, Donny. You're out of your element.

This seems like a problem you could solve with a fairly limited quantity of bungee cord.

Some of us think it's a bit sad that they are throwing away rebuildable engines and that the cost is so stupendous, but also aren't Leon fans. I think starship is a better bet in the not too long term, and wish he wasn't involved with it.

Ok but this is true in general. Raspi is just grossly overpriced even on a good day.

That's a lot more common than you would think though because of automatic game and driver updates, and the march of upgrades necessary to play modern games. Most players of a particular game are on similar hardware.

Data caps are still a thing but they mostly control download. Most users are on cable now, this is generally asymmetric, so the upstream is mostly just limited by practical considerations. (Upstream and downstream frequencies must differ in DOCSIS, and they dedicate more bandwidth to downstream for obvious reasons.)

How is it that 1/4 of a phone costs as much as 1/2 of a phone?

Sure, but many people would opt in, especially if you explained that they would benefit.

Yeah, it's added complexity they would have to support and maintain. That alone is sufficient reason not to do it frankly.