Comment Re: prediction (Score 1) 11
Bespoke Echo Chambers? That's their new feature? Removing even the remotest possibility of an opinion differing from your own, what a great idea!
Bespoke Echo Chambers? That's their new feature? Removing even the remotest possibility of an opinion differing from your own, what a great idea!
But you probably mean something far simpler. In a Capitalist Democracy, the line between public and private services can be drawn in a number of places. In the US, we prefer more private to public, but in Northern Europe, the line is drawn much further on the public side. But still Capitalist Democracies. Canada, I think, is somewhere between the two.
So, there are popular misconceptions on both sides as a result. People on the right tend to see any more towards more public services as Socialism. This is incorrect, the line can move without changing systems. People on the left, perhaps as a failure of the right's rhetoric, think they want Socialism because they want more public services. This is dangerously incorrect. People who think they want Socialism when they actually just want a few more public services, end up agitating for what they don't want. Actual Socialism is entirely incompatible with Democracy. It cannot function if the People make their own economic choices, and as a result, if they make their own political choices. That's why every single Socialist nation immediately became a totalitarian dictatorship. Any totalitarian system, and Socialism very much is one, must be a dictatorship. And nobody wants to live under a dictatorship unless they think they can become the dictator.
I'm going to call BS on the CPU thermal numbers though. Unless Intel has managed to get it down from 100.
And you do know that your signature is a call for the complete genocide of the Jews, right? The slogan is a direct call to slaughter all the Jews between the Jordan and the Mediterranean. And you're joining in.
I find that I rather enjoy our disagreements, but I like to argue. It's a character flaw, true, but without it I'd be perfect. And just imagine how insufferable that would be.
Any particular reason you brought it up?
If that's the case, and Manus closed or divested its Chinese operations, then they are not in any way subject to Chinese law. Since Manus is a big-buzz AI firm, China is probably trying to keep the tech and know-how from leaving. Which it already has.
It just looks like China wants to cancel the sale of a Singaporean company to an American company, and they're willing to kidnap its two top people in order to coerce them into doing so. It could blow up into a real international ordeal, as China appears to be trying to seize an American-owned, Singapore-based company worth billions.
China refuses to play by the same rules as everyone else. We never should have let them join the game.
"A car is just a big purse on wheels." -- Johanna Reynolds