Not many good programmers these days.

No point in it, managers don't care if you do a good job, as long as you close the ticket. For some managers, if you included bugs, that's a good thing. It's more tickets that can be opened.

Good job predicting that, you prophet.

Tim Cook thought AR (augmented reality) was the future, that's why he started putting in the beefy hardware. Turned out the future was in chatbots.

Now Tim is not in charge anymore, the things he liked at Apple are like old leaves flowing away in soft autumn wind.

If likes and boosts are overrated, then is there a way to find others' posts about a topic or to get more replies to my posts?

By his second term, most people understood that Trump was a liar.

This wasn't a distinguishing feature since the other team lies, too.

The study is not sensational.

You should have at least read the abstract.

Maybe you should read the actual scientific paper instead of ranting. It will give you knowledge and improve your blood pressure. (In case you missed that last reference: ranting raises your blood pressure. There you go).

Man, if you're getting your science information from news stories, the problem is you.

We live in a world where the actual study is a click away. At least read the abstract.

Entangling multiple qbits is still tough

Their target audience is people who use Cursor AI for vibe coding.

Their target audience will be happy with the solution if they can set it up without thinking. Which one has more features mostly won't matter.

If it takes more tokens for an agent to do all that instead of using cursorRepo, then they're going to use cursorRepo. Their target audience is people who really really like vibe coding.

And Cursor has quite a bit of control over how many tokens it takes to do either one.

Indeed, getting entanglement to work right may be the biggest barrier to quantum computing currently.

The question isn't an abstract application of law. The question is:

How do we prevent abuses from the police?

LOL the house of the lotus eaters was just a room with walls covered by infinite scroll videos you wanted to see.

From the summary: "Current prices are tied to retail. Without physical discs holding digital hostage we'll see a larger spectrum of pricing." As I understand this, paid downloads did not lower prices of AAA games because of retail price parity contracts. Paid downloads did, however, make the $5 to $20 tier for indie game pricing viable.

One thing not mentioned in the summary is that publishers of games distributed in physical copies owe a royalty to the age rating agency of each region in which a game is published. Publishers of downloadable games do not, instead relying on self-certification through the IARC form. The age rating agencies allow this because it's a lot more practical to update a game once it is found to have been misclassified.