Grok was constantly say it was doing something that it had ZERO ability to, and I kept calling it out and it kept apologizing and then immediately doing it again.

As a guy who spend 5 figures a year on Ai, the last thing I want is that. I know Claude and ChatGPT also do it, but Grok was doing it CONSTANTLY.

Open claw can use local LLM, but typical configuration is remove LLM api calls. It's not running everything in the device.

It's not friendly, but then, I didn't ask for it to be.

quite seriously, it's rather functional for a vibe coded / accidental development.

https://mdtopham.github.io/Vibecoded/asteroids.html

do what you want with it.

Already broken. Time to move forwarded.

I was asking for a proof of concept yesterday and accidentally got a functional implementation of asteroids.

Yeah, welcome to the future.

Using AI is training AI to replace you. If you can be replaced with AI, you will be, and should be.

If you don't use AI, your peers will be, and you will be replaced by AI anyway.

Good Luck

And a douche bag of a president who drops bombs next to schools and kills 135 kids . Should resign on the spot for that.

Look up "human shields", the practice of siting military targets among (or in or under) large collections of non-military civilians, in order to deter strikes against them or produce propaganda claims of atrocities when they're attacked anyhow.

In such situations the fault for the "collateral damage" is assigned to the side that set up the arrangement, not the side that hit it.

Nevertheless, it should be noted that the US has been trying very hard to use precision munitions and extreme military intelligence to take out military targets with as little harm to the innocents they're embedded among as possible, with impressive success. Compare the amount of collateral damage in this war to any of those conducted in the 20th century.

He's doing the bare minimum sniff test of verifying that *you* are the guy whose name is on the bookings and not someone sneaking in on someone else's name who can't even pronounce the name on your fake id.

At least in the case of people claiming to be returning citizens I've been told that they're comparing your accent to your claimed residence (or residence history).

Different words are acquired at different ages, and many are pronounced with regional variations. An expert can talk to you for a few minutes and come up with a pretty good age-map of where you lived as you grew up. An agent with a modicum of training can detect a mismatch between how you pronounce certain words and your claimed residence and pass you through quickly or keep you around and drill more deeply. (If you now live in an area with a regional accent wildly different from where you grew up it can help to answer a where-do-you-reside question with "Footown, but I grew up in Barstate".)

I presume they are doing something similar, though no doubt with lower resolution, on the world-wide level for visitors from other countries.

Lying to yourself is the biggest danger for trying to stay Anonymous. With enough patterns to recognize, the idea that one can hide is a delusional take.

The only way to win, is to run EVERYTHING you post through an AI that changes the tone and words used in all your online activity. But even then that may itself be a lie.

We don't even have the ability to detect our civilization from the distances involved.

At meta? It ain't about ethics, or morals.

It's about money.

Plagiarism and copyright violation aren't the same thing, contrary to some people's opinion.

LLMs don't produce a literally work verbatim, they produce extracts verbatim. I have two ex-gf that can quote entire pages from books they've read. (dozens, to hundreds). (it helps to be on the spectrum).

But, the ability to do doesn't mean anything they produce is inherently a violation; it does increase the *risk*.

Copyright isn't that infectious.

You'd never be allowed to right a book after university as you would have been exposed to too much material if that were the case.

Clear room implementation is *not* required.

The idea of a clean room implementation is to remove the possibility of the resulting code being in violation, however, that's not actually required to avoid being in violation. That just makes it much easier to show good faith.

If you implement a test suite, and then have the AI generate a version that complies with the test suite, it's entirely possible you are not in violation.

Symantec code validation would be prudent, but not necessarily required.

(Replace all variables with generic references and see if the code matches up).

Keep in mind, have a dozen lines of code actually match still doesn't mean those lines are a violation, it just means they could be.

It's Not Enough to "Caution Against".

That language is TOO PASSIVE.

The correct and appropriate phrase is "HELL NO" and start tossing out 1st, 4th, 5th amendment claims IN COURT.

Fuck you and that Ribbon.

I'm sorry. This is a topic that makes me nerd-rage.

LK