Stop cut and pasting AI slop you moron, it doesnt make you look smart. We re quite capable of quizzing an LLM ourselves.

Frameworks have nothing to do with OO. Ask any javascript kiddie. And if you want to babble about "how computers really work" I presume you're programming them using front console toggle switches and an enter button? No? Didn't think so.

"I've worked on were big and complex mainly"

yeah, sure you have.

"you're a just noob that needs more experience before spouting your theories."

Son, I started out with punched cards. I was probably programming before your parents had even met so spare me your faux guru BS. You really need to go get a clue. OO makes a number of problems simple, so does declarative programming. Horses for courses. When you've got some actual experience instead of playing with you PC in your bedroom you might realise that.

what's the point?

The point is to be able to use your hardware in the manner you deem appropriate, and to ensure it is not doing sneaky shit behind your back.

If, instead of a Playstation, we were talking about rooting LG televisions to run custom Linux builds stripped of pervasive privacy-violating code and "apps," I suspect your opinion might be rather different. (And no, when the entire industry has turned to the Dark Side, voting with your wallet doesn't work.)

Says someone who's never worked on a big system with complex data.

That's why most C devs migrated to C++. Remind us about Rusts object model... oh that's right , it doesnt have one. Like VB it has kinda sorta OO type stuff but theres actual OO there. And yes, it does matter. Procedural programming large code based becomes a chore real fast.

"The game is up" is a common turn of phrase you aspie idiot. Normal people know exactly what he means.

Thanks for the heads up, I never thought of searching for the info. Been there, done that, I still don't understand whats going on on a large scale inside these models.

... I know how my parents felt when I tried to explain programming too them. It all makes grammatical sense but the actual meaning eludes me.

Is it just me? Am I just getting old and heading for the get-off-my-lawn stage or are there any other people who like to think they're tech savvy but are totally confused by AI models and how they really work?

From what I can gather, superionic means the O2 is frozen in a lattice while the H2 moves around within in. Doesn't this just mean the water/ice has dissociated into solid oxygen with hydrogen diffused inside?

Doesn't seem that much to me at all given how much iron can expand and contract per degrees C as it heats and cools. 14 miles out of 3000 is 0.5% which is nothing.

CO2 being an infra red absorber and scatterer really isn't hard to understand for anyone with even a passing understanding of physics. ie not you.

"but weather changes are so significant that our prediction models dont work anymore"

AI weather models may use the past to predict the future but AFAIK conventional models simply use physics so climate change will be factored in by default by dint of registering higher temps at monitoring stations.

You couldn't model it accurately even in principle as quantum theory states you can't know the absolute position and speeds at the same time.

A good demonstration of how mathematics is the best humans have come up with to define the physical laws but reality ultimately may not be fully describable by it.