Not exactly, Big Tobacco was providing a product to you which you in turn used to damage yourself. The case is about Oil/Coal Companies selling a product to someone else that damages your property(by global warming) and energy providers who burn Coal/Oil which damages your property. The key difference is who caused the property damage you or someone else. In this case someone else(assuming you can prove it). If we must use ananologies. The first group is more like sueing the gun manufacturers for making a gun someone else shot and broke your window. The latter is more like sueing some one for shooting a gun and having the unintentional effect of bouncing off the target and breaking your window.