Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Get HideMyAss! VPN, PC Mag's Top 10 VPNs of 2016 for 55% off for a Limited Time ×

Submission + - Microsoft will use Windows 10 UWP to kill game vending competitors like Steam (pcgamer.com) 2

slashdot_commentator writes: In an interview with Edge Magazine, Tim Sweeney is claiming that future updates to Windows 10 could serve to erode the usefulness of third-party applications and storefronts like Steam.

Sweeney states, "The risk here is that, if Microsoft convinces everybody to use UWP, then they phase out Win32 apps. If they can succeed in doing that then it’s a small leap to forcing all apps and games to be distributed through the Windows Store. Once we reach that point, the PC has become a closed platform. It won’t be that one day they flip a switch that will break your Steam library – what they’re trying to do is a series of sneaky manoeuvres. They make it more and more inconvenient to use the old apps, and, simultaneously, they try to become the only source for the new ones."

"Slowly, over the next five years, they will force-patch Windows 10 to make Steam progressively worse and more broken. They’ll never completely break it, but will continue to break it until, in five years, people are so fed up that Steam is buggy that the Windows Store seems like an ideal alternative. That’s exactly what they did to their previous competitors in other areas. Now they’re doing it to Steam. It’s only just starting to become visible. Microsoft might not be competent enough to succeed with their plan, but they’re certainly trying."

Comment Re:Interesting quote in article (Score 1) 237

It would take Baby Bush to be that idiot and leave manned flight to the Russians.

To be fair to Shrub, it became hideously difficult for Congress to fund rational gov't programs. The Russians aren't enemies, and in this case, a really cheap case of outsourcing an outdated technology. Be honest. What manned space flight? Its only a couple of launches a year, and its below the Earth's Van Allen belts. Hardly worth continuing to blow billions of dollars per year.

Maybe Obama is also an idiot for not trying to revive a gutted NASA while the capability was still there,

No, in this case, you would be the idiot. The best thing the US gov't could do is get NASA out of the way, and support private endeavors to commercialize space. NASA's only utility is robotic exploration, and hugely expensive human research programs that the private sector would not touch. We're (probably) not going back to the Earth or Mars with this US Congress, so cut the Obama shit, and lay blame where it really belongs. (The important point being that NASA doesn't have a "capability" for Apollo style manned space programs anymore.)

Comment Re:Extinguish (Score 1) 212

No, they can't. It involves them going outside their mindset of their business model. They have a lot of spare cash now, but they would have to plow it into expensive bets, which they don't appear to be doing. Computing is going cloud, and they're barely interested in ramping up their iCloud capabilities. Not that it would matter, unless Apple found a way to access all that data being collected by Google, Amazon, Microsoft, etc. . Then they would have to spend lots of money to hire actual geniuses to process and research that data in a way that would allow them to leapfrog current applications of computing.

Their problem is that their highest value as a corporation is to maintain revenue and profit margins. They don't have the leadership (or shareholders) willing to jeopardize their current model in order to create new markets. Steve Jobs was the kind of CEO who could do that sort of thing, but not his replacement team. Apple is led by John Sculleys right now.

Their model involves creating a monopoly (or branding) of their intellectual property using trademarked hardware to secure the monopoly. What happens when the phone and the Macbook go the way of the iPod? Yeah, they're plowing money into a self-driving car, but lets face it, even if successful, they're not going to maintain their computing environment when no one wants to buy their products to type in queries and when it becomes "unprofitable" to compete with smartphones linked with cloud computing features. Microsoft has more of a future in the computing industry than Apple.

Comment Re:So it begins... (Score 1) 212

I did not say cloud systems are more secure because they're paying them. I'm saying cloud systems are more secure because software AND architecture is homogeneous on the infrastructure level. In fact, patching is automated in cloud systems. In the civilian homesteads, patching & security is dependent on people with no clue about either. Why go through the f-ing Windoze hassle once a month, or even leave yourself at the mercy of windows10 or app update scheduling, when you pay a cheap, flat fee to fire up a firmware thin client, and have all the (scalable) computing with no management/debugging hassle? The answer is that companies providing true cloud services are still more expensive than the TCO of a subnominal local hack.

Slashdot Top Deals

Often statistics are used as a drunken man uses lampposts -- for support rather than illumination.