Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
Compare cell phone plans using Wirefly's innovative plan comparison tool ×

Comment Re:I can't hear you (Score 2) 393

DRM for sound is completely impossible. CD with DRM? Plug the CD player's headphone jack to your computer's sound inputs and sample. Hell, I get albums weekly; every Sunday night KSHE plays six full albums. I just capture the stream on its way to the speakers.

The only way to keep DRM "protected" music from playing on an iPhone is to get rid of wi-fi, bluetooth, the headphone jack, and the USB port. If I can put data on it at all, I can strip the DRM from those data before loading it on a phone.

DRM is a bad joke.

Comment Re:Whydja quit cigarettes (Score 1) 2

I did the math. Pack and a half a day was costing $300 a month, and all I got out of it was temprrarily not needing a cigarette.

I actually quit once before, in 1999. I got stupid drunk with a bunch of smokers and got hooked again.

Although two beers and a puff of reefer does usually get me started writing. I think the pause in the muse is from breaking the routine; the cigarette break.

I got over it before, I'll do it again. Oddly, the first time I quit it didn't affect me as much. I wrote "How to quit smoking cigarettes" in 2003, posted it on K5 (back before it was a ghost town) and if you googled anything about quitting, it was the first hit for years. It must have been pretty good, It's in my latest book.

Submission + - The Music Industry's New War Is About So Much More Than Copyright (

tedlistens writes: Last month, Taylor Swift, U2, and around 180 other artists signed a letter calling on US lawmakers to reform the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, or DMCA, which it said allowed "major tech companies to grow and generate huge profits” while leaving artists underpaid. (Though YouTube isn't mentioned by name, it's obvious to which "major tech companies” the letter is referring.) Still, while complaining (or hearing complaints) about low revenues from digital music has become as much a rock & roll cliche as devil horns or dying young, a deeper read of the industry's latest campaign against Silicon Valley “greed” (and 8 helpful charts) reveals that this "war" on online streaming is more complex than it seems: in spite of its efforts at a subscription service, YouTube's ad-based royalties remain a major issue. And untangling it is more important than ever: as it seeps again into the halls of Congress, the debate could impact copyright, online ads, and the future of making and listening to music.
User Journal

Journal Journal: No good story ever started with someone eating a salad 2

It was some time last year that someone on Facebook posted a graphic that said "Beer: because no good story ever started with someone eating a salad." There are a lot of them to be found in Google Images.

So I decided to write a good story that starts with someone eating a salad, although parts of the story do take place in a bar. How good is it?

User Journal

Journal Journal: What were they thinking?

I didn't know how much storage my "new" tablet has (hadn't looked, it's eight gigs) but reading the manual that I had to google to find (It's second-hand) I saw that it would take a 30 gig SD card, what they're calling single inline memory modules (SIMMs) these days. I decided to get one at Walgreens when I got beer.

It was a 32 GB SIMM (MicroSD, whatever) so I made sure to keep the receipt in case it wouldn't work in the tablet, but installing it was easy.

Comment Re: Good (Score 2) 534

Ads are a service if you see a product advertised that fills a need you have that you thought didn't exist. Serve me an ad for an Android tablet that will play OTA TV (the needed technology is all inside the tablet, all it would need was programming) I'd buy one in a minute. They would be happy band so would I.

But I don't think that tablet exists; I've looked for it.

Comment Re:Good (Score 1) 534

Actually, facebook is fixing the things that almost everyone installs ad blockers to get away from -- page load speeds on high speed internet that make it load slower than a 1997 web page from a 33.6 modem and flashy, distracting bullshit. Facebook doesn't need an ad blocker, but by God every single one of the damned newspapers do.

The newspapers and everyone else should do this. I see it as a GOOD thing.

Comment Re:False advertising... (Score 1) 101

I've been laughing at, and shaking my head at, those commercials since they first aired. "We have the fastest wi-fiI!" Well, that's true, but since wi-fi is slower than DSL even with only a single user connected, EVERYONE has the fastest wi-fi.

You know that, I know that, but Joe Average doesn't. That's the nature of advertising in the US at least; sell to the uninformed. Plenty of fools in the world, no need to target anyone with an average or above IQ or amount of technical knowledge.

Slashdot Top Deals

"May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house." -- George Carlin