Actually probably not the chip is larger, but the lens is larger. The aperture allows it to be less blurry in bright light.

The chip is larger so it collects more light and thus improves low-light photography, but this would make bright-light photography worse (by reducing depth of field). The aperture fixes this for bright light, thus allowing the better low-light performance.

The examples comparing prices are all comparing them to battery-backed systems that can continuously produce the rated power. The solar panels or wind turbines will be capable of far higher peak power that is used to charge the batteries. I have no idea whether any numbers being quoted here are accurate, but the posters are absolutely describing "base power" when quoting their prices.

No - this isnâ(TM)t a solution to the navier stokes equations, itâ(TM)s a demonstration that theyâ(TM)re unstable in a physically unrealistic way in certain circumstances.

That sounds strange too. If we understand how to make all the energy in a fluid dynamic system suddenly converge on one point and form an incredibly high spike, Iâ(TM)m pretty sure weâ(TM)d come up with uses for that. Barnes Wallace certainly would have been very interested. Iâ(TM)m pretty sure his successors in the weapons industry would too.

To be fair to them, itâ(TM)s not *quite* that simple - it proved something more than they had so far managed to. But itâ(TM)s pretty clear that all the significant ideas of where to go with the proof came from this guyâ(TM)s work. Itâ(TM)s using the same terminology for all his ideas by âoepure coincidenceâ.

There was a parking lot there before. And LA has plenty of other examples of similar architecture, some of it considered LA landmarks

Reading scores fell more sharply in students from better-off backgrounds

Sounds like at least we have achieved equality in stupidity!

Except... SpaceX don't actually get any grants at all from the US government. They do get contracts from NASA, and SpaceForce to launch things occasionally, but they're by far the minority of their revenue. SpaceX's revenue breaks down as:

Starlink: $11.4bn
Launches for non government entities: $3.0bn (est)
Launches for NASA: $1.2bn (est)
Launches for Space Force: $1.8bn
xAI/Other: $1.3bn

It's known that the 3.0 and 1.2 sum to 4.2, and the rough contract values for NASA's launches are known, but they're not nailed down. It's likely that about $200mn of that "other" is NASA paying SpaceX to develop the HLS.

We give a shit, because once they have a monopoly on the manufacturing the price is going to get jacked up, and no anti-competition court is going to be able to do jack shit about it.

Okay, maybe, but... my MacBook Pro (M5 Max) can run Qwen 3.8 27b with 162k context window at 65 tokens per second. So your $2500 system is aproximately half the speed of a MacBook Pro. A MacStudio with 128GB of RAM and an M5 ultra costs $5000 - twice as much as your system, but would run it at somewhere around 120-130 tokens per second.

Well, since you seem to know everything about it, lets assume you do, and look at how much your proposed system would cost...

Lets see what GPUs have ever shipped with 32GB of RAM...
the 5090...

oh... that's it. So... absolutely no "old GPUs with 32GB of RAM" are available.

Well, lets assume you meant 24GB for the sake of it, what GPUs shipped with that?
The 4090, the 3090, the A5000, the 4500, and the 7900. We're going to need 6 of them to get past 128GB. Lets be kind and call it 5, because the mac is going to use *some* of its 128GB for the CPU. How much do they cost?

- The 4090 with 24GB of RAM... $4500 on eBay, so that's $22500 in GPUs.
- The 3090 with 24GB of RAM... $1500 on eBay, so that's $7500 in GPUs.
- The A5000... $2500 each on eBay, so that's $12500 in GPUs.
- The 4500 with 24GB... $2200 on eBay, so that's $11000 in GPUs.
- The 7900 with 24GB.... $1200 on eBay, so that's $6000 in GPUs.

So... nope... it's not cheeper to do it that way. You litterally can't even buy the GPUs for that much, let alone the motherboard capable of running 5 GPUs with reasonable amounts of PCIe bandwidth each.

It wouldnâ(TM)t surprise me. Claude has been trying to gaslight me into believing that a bug it was finding hard to fix didnâ(TM)t actually exist.

Well, assuming these are all independent events. It could for example be that they all depend on some shared component at some point, and thereâ(TM)s some brain dead configuration in there that updated to a broken version on live systems. I know, Iâ(TM)m grasping at straws. In reality, the possibility of an attack seems much more likely, but itâ(TM)s possible it was all self inflicted.

I get plenty of spam SMS from blue organizations. This is actually one area where "both sides!!!!" argument applies.