Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror

Comment It's for LLMs. (Score 1) 27

by segin (#65433239) Attached to: Apple Notes Expected To Gain Markdown Support

Adding Markdown support to Notes is about exactly one thing: Enabling LLMs, via tool calls, to create formatted notes on the user's device.

And how do LLMs universally create formatted text? Markdown. This is completely about Apple Intelligence and having it create Notes.

Comment The legal ignorance of everyone in this thread... (Score 1) 68

...is utterly unsurprising. Legal perspectives on "who" is taking out actions through software say it's not the user driving the software, but the developer of said software. Between your pressing of "Enter" at the URL bar and GET / HTTP/1.1, legally sits Mozilla. Welcome to the enshittification of legal systems through lawyers fighting shitty intellectual property infringement lawsuits (thank you, copyright, patent, and IP trolls for the minefield of court precedent we've all carefully got to wade through.) Such wording becomes legally necessary. Arguably, Tim Berners-Lee should have included it with WorldWideWeb from the very first public release 25 December 1990.

Submission + - Hacker Gains Admin Control of Sourcegraph and Gives Free Access To the Masses (arstechnica.com)

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes: An unknown hacker gained administrative control of Sourcegraph, an AI-driven service used by developers at Uber, Reddit, Dropbox, and other companies, and used it to provide free access to resources that normally would have required payment. In the process, the hacker(s) may have accessed personal information belonging to Sourcegraph users, Diego Comas, Sourcegraph’s head of security, said in a post on Wednesday. For paid users, the information exposed included license keys and the names and email addresses of license key holders. For non-paying users, it was limited to email addresses associated with their accounts. Private code, emails, passwords, usernames, or other personal information were inaccessible.

The hacker gained administrative access by obtaining an authentication key a Sourcegraph developer accidentally included in a code published to a public Sourcegraph instance hosted on Sourcegraph.com. After creating a normal user Sourcegraph account, the hacker used the token to elevate the account privileges to those of an administrator. The access token appeared in a pull request posted on July 14, the user account was created on August 28, and the elevation to admin occurred on August 30. “The malicious user, or someone connected to them, created a proxy app allowing users to directly call Sourcegraph’s APIs and leverage the underlying LLM [large language model],” Comas wrote. “Users were instructed to create free Sourcegraph.com accounts, generate access tokens, and then request the malicious user to greatly increase their rate limit. On August 30 (2023-08-30 13:25:54 UTC), the Sourcegraph security team identified the malicious site-admin user, revoked their access, and kicked off an internal investigation for both mitigation and next steps.”

The resource free-for-all generated a spike in calls to Sourcegraph programming interfaces, which are normally rate-limited for free accounts. “The promise of free access to Sourcegraph API prompted many to create accounts and start using the proxy app,” Comas wrote. “The app and instructions on how to use it quickly made its way across the web, generating close to 2 million views. As more users discovered the proxy app, they created free Sourcegraph.com accounts, adding their access tokens, and accessing Sourcegraph APIs illegitimately.” [...] While most data was available for all paid and community users, the number of license keys exposed was limited to 20.

Slashdot Top Deals

"I've seen the forgeries I've sent out." -- John F. Haugh II (jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US), about forging net news articles

Close