Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror

Submission + - Mozilla Launches Focus By Firefox, A Content Blocker For iOS 9

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes: Mozilla today launched an iOS content blocker called Focus by Firefox. We say “content blocker” because although Fcous is capable of blocking some ads, this latest project from the non-profit is aimed at stopping trackers. You can download the app now from Apple’s App Store. The free app is made possible thanks to iOS 9’s content-blocking feature, which requires some setting up. Like with any content blocker, after you download Focus, you’ll have to activate Focus’ content-blocking features within your system-wide iOS settings (launching the app will provide a guide to finish configuration).

Submission + - Radeon Graphics Cards To Support HDR Displays And FreeSync Over HDMI In 2016 (hothardware.com)

Submitted by MojoKid
MojoKid writes: AMD's Radeon Technologies Group has announced a couple of new features for Radeon graphics support in 2016. FreeSync over HDMI support will be coming to all Radeons that currently support FreeSync. FreeSync over HDMI, however, will require new displays. The HDMI specification doesn't currently have support for variable refresh rates, but it does allow for vendor specific extensions. Radeon Technologies Group is using these vendor specific extensions to enable the technology. A number of FreeSync over HDMI compatible displays are slated to arrive early next year from brands including LG, Acer, and Samsung. The first notebook with FreeSync has also launched. Lenovo's Y700 gaming notebook is the first with a validated, FreeSync-compatible panel. The Radeon Technologies Group also announced that support for DisplayPort 1.3, HDMI 2.0a and HDR displays was coming in the 2016 pipeline as well. With current 8-bit panels, the range of colors, contrast, and brightness presented to users is only a fraction of what the human eye can see. When source material is properly mapped to an HDR panel, colors are more accurately displayed representing more closely what the human eye would see in the real world.

Submission + - Bulldozer's Just As Bad With Servers (arstechnica.com)

Submitted by RobinEggs
RobinEggs writes: Some reviews of Bulldozer's performance in servers have arrived, and Arstechnica has a breakdown. The results are pretty ugly. Apparently Bulldozer fares just as poorly with servers as with desktops.

From the article: 'One reason for the underwhelming performance on the desktop is that the Bulldozer architecture emphasizes multithreaded performance over single-threaded performance. For desktop applications, where single-threaded performance is still king, this is a problem. Server workloads, in contrast, typically have to handle multiple users, network connections, and virtual machines concurrently. This makes them a much better fit for processors that support lots of concurrent threads. Some commentators have even suggested that Bulldozer was, first and foremost, a server processor; relatively weak desktop performance was to be expected, but it would all come good in the server room.

Unfortunately for AMD, it looks as though the decisions that hurt Bulldozer on the desktop continue to hurt it in the server room. Although the server benchmarks don't show the same regressions as were found on the desktop, they do little to justify the design of the new architecture.'

It's probably much too early to start editorializing about the end of AMD, or even to say with certainty that Bulldozer has failed, but my untrained eye can't yet see any possible silver lining in these new processors.

Slashdot Top Deals

The end of labor is to gain leisure.

Close