You don't have to complain about everything. Removing plastic from the water is a good thing.

That's quite a lot of confidence in his intellect.

I've seen you write better comments.

I CAN cite the law that says so. One of many.
If you had bothered to read the summary, you could cite the law, too.

The law says they do owe me something.

Turn your brain on.

You do know that wasn't Bill Gates, right?

I worked for a company that implemented the "Right to Know" for the CCPA. I can assure you that the data they sent to users was not anywhere near everything that was required under the law.

Nice. Way to make the world a better place.

I want you to understand that your post makes you sound like an anti-science delusional nutcase.

Why? Because data about ivermectin side effects is available, but you decided to listen to the the self-comforting anecdote.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

A public company is going to issue more stock to raise capital.

It's been widely reported. You could find it yourself, but you would continue to lie instead.

It's an ok way to open a shell.

You are a liar.

It's Windows.

For years, Microsoft used revenue as a metric to know if a feature was good or not. This gave them customer feedback, and they could adjust accordingly.

Around the time of Vista, it stopped working as a metric because everyone had already bought Windows. By that time, corporate motivation had changed, and the motivation of managers was to backstab each other as they climbed the corporate ladder. So they never really came up with another metric to determine if customers liked their product or not, they were too busy doing other things.

The reason the Linux Kernel (and open source in general) is such good code is because they fix bugs when they find them. This enforces a certain amount of quality to the structure and organization of the code, otherwise they would be spending all their time fixing bugs until they figured it out.

Consider a typical corporate bug tracker that is overflowing with bugs, the bug count always increasing. Inevitably this leads to a cludge, where the code is disorganized and almost unmanageable. Working through the code is like working through molasses. If they reversed the bug count vector, so it was decreasing (even slowly) instead of increasing, then soon the code structure would begin to get cleaner and cleaner as well. The correlation is strong.

So this is to Linus' merit, that he doesn't ignore bugs just because they are from AI. It will make the code cleaner.

This one goes to eleven, you impotent numbskull.