I came here to look for this and add it if I didn't find it.
Lunar "soil" is essentially neutral, just needs some additives. Conversely, Martian "soil" is actually poisonous. Additives alone aren't sufficient to get things to grow in it, you need to remove the poisonous parts first.
Net: It's easier to grow plants in lunar rather than Martian "soil".
Regardless of anything else, no one should need a constitutional amendment to do this. This can just be a regular statute law.
If it were a regular law, a state court could potentially invalidate it for violating the state constitution in some way.
If you hook up to electricity from Quebec then your coffee pot is going to make poutine and your TV will only ever play hockey.
I fail to see the problem here.
by the way it's not even a children's charity. It's actually some religious organization masquerading as a children's charity to scam people into giving money to their church. That makes them extra-double-super loathsome.
If I remember correctly, it isn't quite that bad. I think it's for a religious school, so it is money being spent on children and not a scam by religious leaders to make money for themselves. It certainly isn't transparent in the ads, and I wouldn't blame anyone for not wanting to donate to them.
If it's a question of legality, then Claude is *not* the one to ask; the court should know the answer to that question without having to consult anybody but the current laws.
Of course the prosecutors and judge already knew the answer. That's why the prosecutors did it - to show that the defendant should have known (by simply asking, if he didn't already know) that an LLM is not an attorney and therefore not covered by any attorney privilege.
The prosecutors wouldn't have done the exercise if they didn't know what result they would get.
You've over simplifying some very complicated things.
Nothing about this is remotely complicated. At all.
I have zero love for America or Israel, but Iran has been a globally very dangerous shithole since its move to a theocracy in 1979 and it's rule by a single supreme leader.
Which is still all your fault for overthrowing their secular democracy in 1953. Go yell at a mirror.
The threat it posed goes far beyond Israel
Iran hasn't attacked another country for centuries.
which is why largely most of the world banded together to prevent those lunatics from developing their nuclear program.
Iran has no nuclear weapons program. YOU are the lunatic necon.
Pearl Harbor was a very surgical strike. And you wouldn't have your head up there if Russia or China struck DC and kidnapped the American president.
"A car is just a big purse on wheels." -- Johanna Reynolds