Iceland or Greenland might be good spots.

Lots of geothermal power and ice water.

This reminds me of a video I saw on titanium extraction, except there seemed to be dozens of steps involved.

Depends on how crazy you are.

I got this update a couple of weeks ago, and it is ANNOYING.

Trying to shove crap I could care less about in my face, plus MORE ADS.

It takes a bit of work, but most of it can be turned off.

Then release the video on pay-per-view.

Because M$ is THE EXPERT on vulnerabilities.

Only if it's presented in a high pitched, grating voice.

Frankly, I'd rather just eat babies.

Not one will be built.

Not one.

Residential zoning WILL NOT allow this.

DOA.

"Due to corporate realignment, Deepmind London is being closed and moved to a non union state in the US"

I saw a documentary on that once. It took place on the moon...

It seems a tad doubtful you understand much of Statistics 101, since you seemingly fail at basic reading comprehension. Unlike you, this guy does understand it, as can be seen from the fact that he speaks about probabilities, not certainties. Giving you the benefit of the doubt here, perhaps you need a refresher? This is basic survival analysis after all.

This is about the only thing you are vaguely meaningful about. He probably has some kind of model in mind for estimating that 2%. It can be reasonably accurate, inaccurate or wrong. It would be interesting if he shared it. As to the "wild-ass-guess" part, statistics of rare events is a thing, but somewhat past the 101 level. War chances can be (and indeed are) modeled statistically. Additional assumptions are needed for nuclear escalation and those can be reasonable or not, but the whole process is not by default a magical hand-waving as you imply.

I just run Kodi on a Pi 4 and use an 8TB external drive, that acts as a backup to my main media drive.

Nothing new.

The Apollo Guidance Computers used resistance welded joints.