What makes you think that it would treat packets arriving on the WAN interface any differently?

I'll gladly learn about the topic more. In my opinion the home router is a default gateway for the LAN so it is reasonable for it to accept on the LAN interface(s) any packets with source IP from LAN network. For any packets with LAN IP source and non-LAN-IP destination it should forward them to the WAN interface (while NAT-ing the source address). However there is no reason no accept any packet on WAN side that does not have destination address matching WAN IP. Just like there is no reason to accept and process packets with non-LAN IP source coming to LAN ports. Or accept and process packets with source or destination IP from private IP space coming to WAN interface.
That's just common sense to me. So are you saying that D-Link, TP-link, Zyxel, ADB, ZTE, ... routers sometimes (often?) do no do this kind of filtering?

You misunderstood me. No offense. I do not oppose IPv6 and I would gladly use it if my ISP provided some reasonable support. I was just asking how the attack on LAN with a ubiquitous NAT implementation in SOHO routers would work.

.,.. does it count as a dupe?

Excuse me, but how does it work in practice? I have currently optic fiber connection going to ISP-provided router - Sagemcom F@st 5670 (Crap. I know.). The ISP will not accept replacing that with a different device (GPON ONT). The device does have a web interface for some basic management, but I can't really inspect the network traffic there. The previous ISP it was the same just different device - Huawei EchoLife HG8245H. The previous ISP was on ADSL with of-the-shelf SOHO router such as D-link Dir-615. In all cases I assume that the device gets on the WAN interface a public (or CGNAT IP) address assigned by ISP and will accept only packets with destination IP address matching that WAN interface IP address. Are you saying that it is not the case and there are routers (provided by ISPs), that will accept packets coming to WAN interface and not having packet destination IP address matching the WAN interface IP address? I find that hard to believe unless we talk about some small community ISP run by amateurs.

What does time-domain reflectometry have to do with this?

a) over here the video from the woman would be not admitted because it does not come from a certified device (e.g. the timestamps on the video would not be trusted). That is, of course, also true for the video used by the police. Unless it comes from certified cameras operated by the police, it should not be admissible.

b) in world of AI you can anytime generate video of you being 100 miles away from the crime scene. How is that supposed to be a relevant proof?

Thanks for your reply. I'll give it a shot.

I got hit by this ;-/ And crucial information is missing.

• Can the faulty KB5066835 be un-installed?
• Does that fix the problem?
• What part of KB5066835 description talks about touching boot process?

I dual boot with the OS selection being done at UEFI level - I have to press a key at boot time to get UEFI boot selection dialog. I don't get the selection dialog if I do normal reboot in Windows, only if I do Shift+Reboot - which was, at some point, announced as a way to "avoid fast boot". Nowadays it seems to be described as a way to enter Windows Recovery Environment. How/why does fast boot skip UEFI boot selection dialog? Would disabling fast boot in windows solve the issue for me? I.e. would I get UEFI boot selection dialog but skip entering the Windows Recovery Environment screen?

I'm pretty sure that intra-group violence is generally more common than inter-group violence and hence the latter is the one that stands out as an intentional decision.

And yet, Australian National University identified significant pumped hydro storage potential in Australia many years ago. Definitely more than they'd ever need.

What if you don't have any social media? I deleted all mine in 2021.

You do know that /. comments are a form of social media, right?

Do comments on bugzilla count too? Or linuxquestions.org?

Besides, I to not remember my passwords for internet sites. They are random generated and managed by a (non-cloud) password manager on a computer that does not travel with me. I could not comply even if I wanted to.

Does it mean Gtk is dropping support? Does that mean that all GTK-based applications such as firefox, thunderbird, java, ... will not work on X11?

What Do People Want? A summary that does not use 174 words to say that they conducted a survey and does use a few words to describe the outcome.