It was worse when Dice owned it.
I don't agree. It was equally competent, which is to say, no competence was displayed. But it didn't have the constant cryptocuck and quantumsuck bullshit and they didn't put reich or nazi or their name into the spam filter.
Climate change (previously known as "global warming" but that name was too obvious of a lie they had to make it vague) is a hoax
Your understanding of physics is over a century out of date. Get with the times.
ok doomer
Oh look, a denialist that got its feefees hurt. Suck it up, snowflake coward.
I have the karma, you've got a purty mouth
The "editors" have one job, engagement. Slashdot has always been social media, but it wasn't enshittified until B!zX bought it. It was only half-assed.
Even fucking up the summary increased engagement here, as it got you to post, so you're teaching them the wrong lesson.
What I posted is flamebait because it made some manchild uncomfortable about reality.
AGW denialists are the dumbest denialists.
What we should have been doing is supporting nature to help us survive climate change.
At this point we're well and rightly fucked, and we earned it.
We're not doing the things we already know how to do in order to address this situation, which is specifically why we're cooked. We deserve it for watching it happen.
I abandoned Ubuntu and went to Devuan, so I got rid of snap and systemd at the same time. Good riddance to both pieces of garbage.
I get your point, but you're talking about technical things where correctness matters. At least use the proper name for something and then tell me in a clear and concise fashion exactly why it's no good.
If you're not confused about what company they're talking about, then what's the problem? A lot of nerds were talking like that back when these products were new. Before it was most commonly written into Micro$oft, people were putting a dollar sign into Compu$erve, to the point where I'd see it written that way more often than not, e.g. on Fidonet threads. Then I got into UUCP (first with UUPC, then Waffle, then SCO UUCP, then AmigaUUCP...) and I would see it written that way on USENET. It's tradition.
There were Unix nerds that looked down on Windows. There were Mac nerds that looked down on Windows. There were Amiga and Atari nerds that looked down on Windows. Back then there were still active VMS nerds who looked down on Windows. And they were all correct, and it's still correct. You can obviously do real work on Windows, but it's not worth the pain. Sadly, it became the de facto standard for working with government, and you needed to run it in order to interface with it as smoothly as possible. Its popularity is like the dollar, it's just too inconvenient to do anything else. Except, "suddenly" (decades of fighting/figuring out how to go around it later) it isn't.
Wine and derivatives run a lot of software very well, but indeed run a minority of it very poorly or not at all. Microsoft and Adobe software are the primary candidates for not running even slightly, and if they do, they definitely do not work right. If you need that software, there is no particular sign that Wine will run it well any time soon, though it will run some of it sort of okay. I've tried quite a bit of it. If you need that software, then you will need Windows, at least in a VM.
Specialized software either works great or fails pathetically with little in between IME. Drivers can be a big problem though, because the software can be looking for the drivers very specifically. If you have Windows software to go with hardware whose interface dongle is not mostly just a ch340 or something, you are probably gonna have a bad time.
Practically everything works great with Linux these days, though. Standards have mostly won and Linux is taken seriously. OSS is now also generally taken seriously and even preferred in solutions large and small. The dependency on closed standards and platforms is waning, and while that's no comfort to anyone forced to run Windows for some compatibility reason now, at least it's becoming less of a problem. Even people who think Windows is fine now recognize that they don't want to be stuck with a dependency on a specific version of it.
If you own a publicly traversable road, then it's not surprising that there's some rules you have to follow for placing them out for notifying people of a hazard. Otherwise it shouldn't require any maths
I suspect you do not need to be told what to do to address this, and I am not running Ubuntu anymore so I do not know in any case, but last I checked the solution was to remove the snap for firefox and pin it away — and to install firefox as a deb package from the official PPA.
Even worse, most of the dynamic loaders the major distros don't support looking up a hash of the needed lib.so instead of a hardcoded file name. (Despite the ELF format supporting it.)
What loader is needed to take advantage of this? Is there a ready solution that can reasonably be built and installed on a typical system?
Nothing gets subsidies like solar energy.
Nobody asked you to lie, yet here you are.
You can trust what Trump says to the extent it serves his interests. Which is true for every politician.
Your attempt to equate all politicians is facile and weak, just like Trump's mind.
...when fits of creativity run strong, more than one programmer or writer has been known to abandon the desktop for the more spacious floor. - Fred Brooks, Jr.
