It has not always been smooth for Mr. Wu
The mouse fight was on and a few hours ago Deadmau5 retaliated with a rather surprising counter attack. As it turns out, Disney is hosting a Deadmau5 video on their website, without permission.
“Disney prominently features the deadmau5 Mark next to the Infringing Video. implying a non-existent endorsement by Zimmerman,” the letter reads. “Again. we are unaware of any license allowing you the right to reproduce, distribute or otherwise exploit the deadmau5 Mark or to exploit Zimmerman’s name and likeness in connection with same.” At the time of writing Disney hasn’t complied with the request, but it seems that they have no other option than to comply. Whether it will change anything in their stance towards the DJ’s mouse ear trademark application is doubtful though.
But the law only applies if somebody is doing it on purpose. Mistakes are not "unfair trade practices". Sending you something other than what you DID ask for, if it is a mistake, is not an intent to defraud you and so the unsolicited merchandise law does not apply. You see?
It appears that it is you who don't know the Unsolicited Merchandise law.
Quote USPS
http://about.usps.com/publications/pub300a/pub300a_tech_021.htm
Megan Garber is being destroyed in the comment section of The Atlantic. There are nearly 50 comments... all of them pointing out how clueless she is about design, how Wikipedia is actually well laid out, that she doesn't know what an empirical truth is , etc...
Oddly enough, Wikipedia has some interesting info on The Atlantic-
"In 2010, The Atlantic posted its first profit in the last decade... was the result of a cultural
transfusion, a dose of counterintuition and a lot of digital advertising revenue."
It has already been suggested in the comments that she may be nothing more than a comment troll.
If you found Megan's article to be insightful, be sure to read her similarly penetrating articles:
Taco Bell vs. Old Spice: The Twitter War That Wasn't
Here Are 10 GIFs That Will Restore Your Faith in GIFs
'New York Times' + Buzzfeed = OMG
Slashdot of 10 years ago would have had a lively debate about the ethics of your experiments and the pro/ con of animal experiments used in education. Sadly, you can see many of the comments have devolved into first posts, Nazi comparisons and knee-jerk animal rights propaganda. Some of us old timers would have been thrilled to be able to probe neural activity in advanced biology (in addition to fetal pig dissection ). Don’t take the negative comments too personally, were not the Slashdot we one were.
You have mail.