Comment Re:Please define "Asian" (Score 1) 44
speak good English
"speak English well"
Both are grammatically correct. Its the second AC who doesn't speak English good.
speak good English
"speak English well"
Both are grammatically correct. Its the second AC who doesn't speak English good.
Does it matter if the drone operator was in the wrong? That does not give the hillbilly permission to shoot it.
How about the next time his pickup truck exceeds the speed limit or parks illegally, we set it on fire. Is that OK?
Neanderthals are/were human, just not homo sapiens. Fire, tools, bigger brains than us, probably language. They may even have been more intelligent than some modern stone-age indigenous peoples. And close enough to us that a modern human could be a surrogate mother.
It looks like resurecting them may be a real possibility: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Do these exist?
No. I'm not even sure it is possible. It was a hypothetical question. Imagine the legal and ethical minefield.
both a traitor and a hero. He can be both, at the same time.
Of course, that's part of my point. The Founding Fathers are more obviously both - heroes to millions, but clearly traitors and they never denied this but only justified it. They had their reasons, but the damage done to achieve their goals was staggering. The harm done by Snowden is minuscule in comparison, and he is suffering for it, rather than gaining wealth and power, so perhaps his justifications are worth listening to?
Getting two devices connected is hard with the piles of nat,
Only in TCP.
Using UDP you can punch right through her hole.
But does it still fit in Eight Megabytes, even with swapping?
OK, so Jurassic-Park is pure fantasy, but I'm still holding out hope for cloning a 10,000 year-old Wooly Mammoth.
And if you want a real ethical problem, what if we could clone and give birth to real Neanderthals, using DNA fragments from 40,000 yo frozen specimens?
I'd do it, just for the spectacle of seeing the lawyers and priests struggling with it.
how many times will the press run this identical story after an incident?
Every time. The Press have always "cashed-in" on disaster and misery.
Isn't it funny
That treason actually killed tens of thousands of people, but is somehow more OK.
Only 280×192 pixels and 64k RAM, but at least it has a headphone socket.
Having not liked Red Dwarf 7 so much, I liked Red Dwarf 8 (#) even less,
Lasts longer than any other season, season 8. Why? No bugger'll watch it.
Following recent EC rulings, Apple is considering registering as a religion for tax purposes. They may succeed, as people have been calling them a religion for years.
Google, on the other hand, having achieved both omniscience and omnipresence, is more a God than a religion.
It's not hard to make an argument that any picture of a naked child could be considered child porn.
Its an old argument and a poor one. The problem is the logic leap from "it can be used for sexual gratification" to "porn". People made the same argument for partially clothed kids, so catalogues no longer have models for kids underwear. But perverts will still like photos of fully clothed models, so next stop is for all kids to wear burkas in public? Once you start changing your behaviour for fringe views, where do you stop?
What about foot fetishes? More common than you think. Does that make bare feet porn? No - for reasons that should now be obvious, useful definitions of porn include intent and context, not just content.
Lets just draw the line at commonly accepted standards. In more conservative parts of the US or Middle East, that means no nudity. In the rest of the world, its OK.
I do, unless they where sexualized
This is Facebook! You'd be lucky to get buttocks on a sheepskin rug past the prudish Facebook censors, let alone anything remotely sexual.
Heard all the fuss about Kim Phuc, or breastfeeding mothers exposing nipples?
HOST SYSTEM RESPONDING, PROBABLY UP...
