funny how this /. poster doewsn't know how to use an adblocker, wonder how many yous had whe you posted that? Mine has 0.

Do you know how to do math? Because that's how. It's not a difficult problem space to quantify. You can easily know how much water one vs the other uses, you can easily know how much detergent you need to use in one vs the other and you also know the costs on those things. You also know how many loads of laundry you do and how frequently. Wear an tear on clothes would take more, but is likely unnecessary to show a net benefit.

Could you really not image this solution as soon as you read the problem?

"Everyone" did not, but people who tend towrads black and white thinking (like someone who would use "everyone" in this context) have.

Nope. It mean what it sounds like: low quality content. It's a perfectly good word. Sounds like you're a true believer who's feeling are hurt. Which means lots of the things you think AI is good at are also slop to everyone else paying attention.

Sadly while your logic sounds spot on, the reality is, that TV still does ACR (basically hashing each screen sometimes multiple times a second) and builds one hell of an accurate profile of everything you watch. Even if the source is HDMI. And it's still sold.

Food for thought, that HDMI cable to your dedicated device, it likely supports networking, so the TV has a path to the internet even if you don't connect an ethernet cable directly to it, or add in your wifi creds.

It's not about protectionism either. Most "us companies" that make routers are making them in china. Cisco even has a ton of chinese developers working in china.

This is about graft and giving "US Companies" a way to submit a bribe through on of numerous already established cahnnels (crypto, library, truth social stock, etc) for exemptions.

Continually proving it's just a bunch of unserious unqualified fools.

Cisco makes their routers in China and have a huge amount of chinese developers as well - it's not just the hardware.

I've heard of traffic 'accidents' where a diabetic went hypoglycemic, passed out, and drove into other cars, pedestrians, etc. For some reason the news always reports it as a 'medical event', but the point is, people are killed by diabetics due to their diabetes way too often. It is an apt analogy. An idiot decides to drink and drive an puts people at risk. An idiot with diabetes fails to control their blood sugar and decides to drive, putting people at risk.

I hate all of this sales pressure BS - that the instant anyone hears your name you have to try to "convert" them to sales - and I literally run a webstore.

It's all so deeply anti-consumer, and I want no part in it.

What an idiotically backwards opinion. Where do people like you come from?

This has been my experience as well. It used to be pretty garbage, but now things seem fine. Most apps I wanted were even available, no need to search for alternatives.

What's baffling are the "people" like the person who replied to you saying your story is "made up." To who's benefit could it be to make up "I'm using a free operating system for free and it works" be?

After decades of using linux at work and home for servers, I finally switched to it on my primary desktop and laptop about a year ago. Sure, there are some annoyances, but certainly fewer than my corporate laptop with windows 11 on it. YMMV depending on what software you use but I really didn't need to find many "alternatives" because the bulk of what I use was already available. Linux Mint seems to "just work", down to making the fingerprint reader on the laptop functional and has a sane-ish desktop environment unlike the terrible GDE that it's Ubuntu downstream is built on. I shrunk and left the original windows install only because Lenovo doesn't seem to be able to get their act together on firmware updates in Linux. But at this point the laptop firmware works fine, power management is good, etc so I don't think there will be any reason to update it again, certainly not for linux support.

Firstly, I see you have this notion that martian rocks must all be igneous.

You're not talking about rock, you're talking about regolith.

Depending on where the regolith is sourced

Regolith is not "sourced", it's blown across the whole planet. It's not simply "whatever the underlying strata is made out of".

But, since we are playing 'name the ignorance' in this exchange, your attestation stat perchlorate is 0.5% liberatable oxygen says 'Say i'm ignorant of basic chemistry without saying i'm ignorant of basic chemistry, and am bad at reading too.' The 0.5% statistic comes from the publication at bottom, and is the proportion of the regolith that is perchlorates.

I am the one who mentioned that regolith is 0.5% perchlorates, not that "perchlorates are 0.5% oxygen". *facepalm*

"Saying we'll get oxygen from the 0,5-1% of a poison in martian regolith, rather than bulk ice or CO2, is..."

For God's sake, learn to fucking read.

Washing the regolith to remove the perchlorate is a requirement for *any* other use of that regolith

Which is why you shouldn't be celebrating its existence. It is a problematic contaminant, not a resource.

As you have rightly pointed out, the water ice on mars is more 'frozen mud'. Cleaning the melt is going to be a necessary first step to using it *regardless*. That means either vacuum distillation, thermal distillation, or reverse osmosis filtration. Again, NOT OPTIONAL. This is necessary equipment that you need to bring, regardless.

And this just to get water, the most basic of offworld resources. And all of that equipment (especially the mining hardware itself) requires maintenance and spare parts, which impose more dependencies. And the TRL for use on Mars is low regardless.

You've gone from talking up the ease of operating on Mars to talking it down, yet your self-righteousness hasn't shifted at all in the process.

RO filtration is the least energy intensive of these.

Except, it isn't. 0,5-1% perchlorates. RO typically removes 90-95% of perchlorates. So you're down to ~500ppm. Human safety levels** are in the low parts per billion. You're five orders of magnitude off. Yes, you can purify water that far - and the more perchlorates, the easier - but you're talking an over millionfold reduction. It is not at all trivial. You're talking first RO to get it down to levels where it won't hinder bacterial growth, then bioreactor bacterial remediation, then filtration, then RO, then ion exchange. This is not some little, simple system.

** Plants can tolerate much more perchlorates than humans, but they also bioaccumulate perchlorates of exposed to them, so you have to reduce the water to low ppb levels.

The end products are clean water and perchlorate contaminated mud, and clean mud, with contaminated water.

Viola! *eyeroll*

And your "plan" for dealing with waste perchlorate doesn't just magically produce pure O2 and NaCl in the real world. First off, molten sodium perchlorate, which is what it becomes before it decomposes, is an extremely corrosive oxidizer. Exactly what are you planning to make the furnace out of, platinum? Secondly, you never get perfect decomposition. Apart from residual perchlorates, you have residual sodium chlorate, which is also corrosive, and is a literal herbicide. And your gas stream will contain contaminant chloride and chlorine dioxide, which, news flash, you don't want to breathe.

There is no way on Earth anyone would ever prefer this to just conducting electrolysis on the water that you've already purified.

Do you normally have and publically voice opinions about things that you don't know anything about? There needs to be more shaming of this behavior.